From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Henrik =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Nordstr=F6m?= <henrik@henriknordstrom.net>
Date: Fri, 24 May 2013 03:14:08 +0200
Subject: [U-Boot] Building two different "SPL" for the same board?
In-Reply-To: <20130523203925.GD17119@bill-the-cat>
References: <1368813967.3925.23.camel@localhost>
	<20130517181719.GW32163@bill-the-cat>
	<1368824185.12475.13.camel@localhost>
	<20130522152653.GF10368@bill-the-cat>
	<1369299219.20995.14.camel@localhost>
	<20130523203925.GD17119@bill-the-cat>
Message-ID: <1369358048.25637.4.camel@localhost>
List-Id: <u-boot.lists.denx.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de

tor 2013-05-23 klockan 16:39 -0400 skrev Tom Rini:

> My rather poor understanding of how some of the Freescale ARM parts do
> SPL is a lot more like this (whack things about, let ROM load next
> parts) than the "SPL takes over, loads U-Boot" method.  And this is OK,
> in so far as it gets needed jobs done in the resources available.

Got it integrated into the tree now and after config changes it could be
reduced to only a dummy (empty) start.c + linker script. The binary grew
by a few KB compared to the separate version, but still well within the
margin.

https://github.com/linux-sunxi/u-boot-sunxi/commit/79272ff764ee392d616feb02fb91c2dcaad42f04

Will show up for review in next round of submitting the sunxi changes.

Regards
Henrik