[U-Boot] [PATCH] powerpc/p1022ds: nand: introduce the TPL based on the SPL

[Scott Wood <scottwood@freescale.com>]

On 06/17/2013 02:56:45 AM, Zhang Ying-B40530 wrote:
> 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Wood Scott-B07421
> Sent: Saturday, June 15, 2013 12:37 AM
> To: Zhang Ying-B40530
> Cc: Wood Scott-B07421; u-boot at lists.denx.de; afleming at gmail.com; Xie  
> Xiaobo-R63061
> Subject: Re: [PATCH] powerpc/p1022ds: nand: introduce the TPL based  
> on the SPL
> 
> On 06/14/2013 05:08:49 AM, Zhang Ying-B40530 wrote:
> >
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Wood Scott-B07421
> > Sent: Friday, June 14, 2013 5:50 AM
> > To: Zhang Ying-B40530
> > Cc: Wood Scott-B07421; u-boot at lists.denx.de; afleming at gmail.com; Xie
> > Xiaobo-R63061
> > Subject: Re: [PATCH] powerpc/p1022ds: nand: introduce the TPL based
> > on the SPL
> >
> > Treat the autoconf.mk patch as a dependency.  Don't try to hack  
> around
> > its absence.
> > [Zhang Ying]
> > According to what you said, the same set of symbols will be declared
> > under different ifdefs.
> > That's the trouble, "The same set of symbols declared under  
> different
> > ifdefs" will not be effective in the "Makefile", in the current  
> case.
> 
> It *will* be effective in the makefile if there is a separate
> autoconf.mk for each phase.  My point is that a separate autoconf.mk
> for each phase is a requirement for TPL to be done in a sane way.
> [Zhang Ying]
> So, could you tell me where I do wrong? Please let me know the  
> specific.
> Thanks.

Do not create a whole bunch of CONFIG_TPL_... definitions.  Base your  
patches on top of the patch that creates a separate autoconf.mk.

-Scott