From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Scott Wood <scottwood@freescale.com>
Date: Mon, 24 Jun 2013 12:41:40 -0500
Subject: [U-Boot] [U-Boot,
 v2] powerpc/mpc85xx:Disable Debug TLB entry before init_tlbs
In-Reply-To: <51C7E467.3010505@freescale.com> (from prabhakar@freescale.com
	on Mon Jun 24 01:17:11 2013)
Message-ID: <1372095700.8183.2@snotra>
List-Id: <u-boot.lists.denx.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de

On 06/24/2013 01:17:11 AM, Prabhakar Kushwaha wrote:
> On 06/24/2013 08:44 AM, Prabhakar Kushwaha wrote:
>> On 06/22/2013 02:42 AM, Scott Wood wrote:
>>> On 06/21/2013 04:05:37 PM, Fleming Andy-AFLEMING wrote:
>>>> 
>>>> On Jun 21, 2013, at 3:59 PM, Scott Wood wrote:
>>>> 
>>>> > On 06/21/2013 03:38:48 PM, Andy Fleming wrote:
>>>> >> On Thu, Jun 13, 2013 at 10:14:00AM +0530, Prabhakar Kushwaha  
>>>> wrote:
>>>> >> > init_tlbs() initialize all the TLB entries required for the  
>>>> system.
>>>> >> >
>>>> >> > So disable DEBUG TLB entry before TLB entries initialization.
>>>> >> >
>>>> >> > Signed-off-by: Prabhakar Kushwaha <prabhakar@freescale.com>
>>>> >> Applied, with fixes.
>>>> >> > diff --git a/arch/powerpc/cpu/mpc85xx/cpu_init_early.c  
>>>> b/arch/powerpc/cpu/mpc85xx/cpu_init_early.c
>>>> >> > index f4403c2..340b063 100644
>>>> >> > --- a/arch/powerpc/cpu/mpc85xx/cpu_init_early.c
>>>> >> > +++ b/arch/powerpc/cpu/mpc85xx/cpu_init_early.c
>>>> >> > @@ -180,5 +180,9 @@ void cpu_init_early_f(void)
>>>> >> >
>>>> >> >      invalidate_tlb(1);
>>>> >> >
>>>> >> > +#if defined(CONFIG_SYS_PPC_E500_DEBUG_TLB) &&  
>>>> !defined(CONFIG_SPL_BUILD)
>>>> >> > +    disable_tlb(CONFIG_SYS_PPC_E500_DEBUG_TLB);
>>>> >> > +#endif
>>>> >> Had to add CONFIG_NAND_SPL here, as well, just for future  
>>>> reference
>>>> >
>>>> > Why exclude all SPLs?  Only minimal SPLs skip creating the debug  
>>>> TLB.
>>>> 
>>>> The definition of disable_tlb() is excluded when NAND_SPL is  
>>>> defined.
>>> 
>>> I'm talking about new-SPL, not NAND_SPL.  My comment is about the  
>>> original patch (I made the comment before internally), not your  
>>> edit to it.
>>> 
>> as per comment from Scott, we should have below define. It takes  
>> care of SPL minimal + nand_spl
>> 
>> #if defined(CONFIG_SYS_PPC_E500_DEBUG_TLB) &&  
>> !defined(CONFIG_SPL_INIT_MINIMAL) && !defined(CONFIG_NAND_SPL)
>> 
>> May I resend this patch?

It would need to be:

#if defined(CONFIG_SYS_PPC_E500_DEBUG_TLB) && \
	!(defined(CONFIG_SPL_INIT_MINIMAL) &&  
defined(CONFIG_SPL_BUILD)) && \
	!defined(CONFIG_NAND_SPL)

> just a afterthought, current modified* patch is correct i.e. " #if  
> defined(CONFIG_SYS_PPC_E500_DEBUG_TLB) && !defined(CONFIG_SPL_BUILD)  
> && !defined(CONFIG_NAND_SPL)"
> DEBUG TLB never been created for SPL & NAND_SPL so no need to disable.

Why would the debug TLB not be created for a non-minimal-init SPL?

-Scott