From: Scott Wood <scottwood@freescale.com>
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de
Subject: [U-Boot] [PATCH] p1020rdb-pd: platform support
Date: Thu, 27 Jun 2013 15:10:25 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1372363825.8183.55@snotra> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <99E897753B6F7048BD8CCDB4661D02E135B045@039-SN2MPN1-023.039d.mgd.msft.net> (from B42677@freescale.com on Thu Jun 27 03:58:57 2013)
On 06/27/2013 03:58:57 AM, Zhang Haijun-B42677 wrote:
> Hi, Scott
>
> Sorry to reply to so late.
> Pls see my reply below.
>
>
> Regards & Thanks
> Haijun.
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Wood Scott-B07421
> > Sent: Wednesday, May 22, 2013 6:24 AM
> > To: Zhang Haijun-B42677
> > Cc: Fleming Andy-AFLEMING; u-boot at lists.denx.de; Huang
> Changming-R66093;
> > Zhang Haijun-B42677; Zhang Haijun-B42677; sun york-R58495
> > Subject: Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] p1020rdb-pd: platform support
> >
> > On 04/28/2013 01:17:34 AM, Haijun.Zhang wrote:
> > > From: "Haijun.Zhang" <haijun.zhang@freescale.com>
> > >
> > > Add platform support for p1020rdb-pd
> >
> > Explain what is different about "-pd" and why this new revision
> requires
> > a separate compile-time target.
> >
> [Haijun Wrote:] We use P1020RDB-PD to instead of P1020RDB-PC board
> later on.
> They are all supported. Nand, DDR, Nor and Spi Flash are different
> between them.
> So I thinks they should be two separate board as P1020UTM and
> P1020MBG do.
Put this information in the changelog.
> > If it's due to raw DDR config, say so in the changelog. Is there
> any way
> > we could read a revision register to select the proper DDR config at
> > runtime?
> [Haijun Wrote:] Now we read DDR config from SPD fist, if not found
> read from config file.
Is there any reason why SPD would not be found?
> > > +#if (defined(CONFIG_P1020RDB) || defined(CONFIG_P1020RDB_PD))
> > > #if defined(CONFIG_P1020RDB)
> > > #define CONFIG_BOARDNAME "P1020RDB-PC"
> > > +#elif defined(CONFIG_P1020RDB_PD)
> > > +#define CONFIG_BOARDNAME "P1020RDB-PD"
> > > +#endif
> >
> > CONFIG_P1020RDB is not a good name to mean specifically the -PC
> revision.
> > Change it so that CONFIG_P1020RDB is set for all revisions of
> P1020RDB,
> > and introduce CONFIG_P1020RDB-PC for PC-specific things.
Could you reply to this one?
...and of course I meant CONFIG_P1020RDB_PC rather than
CONFIG_P1020RDB-PC. :-)
-Scott
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-06-27 20:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-04-28 6:17 [U-Boot] [PATCH] p1020rdb-pd: platform support Haijun.Zhang
2013-05-21 22:23 ` Scott Wood
2013-06-27 8:58 ` Zhang Haijun-B42677
2013-06-27 20:10 ` Scott Wood [this message]
2013-06-28 1:55 ` Zhang Haijun-B42677
2013-06-28 2:13 ` Scott Wood
2013-06-28 2:07 ` Zhang Haijun-B42677
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2013-06-27 7:44 Haijun.Zhang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1372363825.8183.55@snotra \
--to=scottwood@freescale.com \
--cc=u-boot@lists.denx.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox