From: Scott Wood <scottwood@freescale.com>
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de
Subject: [U-Boot] [PATCH v2] dfu, nand, ubi: add partubi alt settings for updating ubi partition
Date: Wed, 17 Jul 2013 17:35:53 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1374100553.8183.371@snotra> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1373950449-21686-1-git-send-email-hs@denx.de> (from hs@denx.de on Mon Jul 15 23:54:09 2013)
On 07/15/2013 11:54:09 PM, Heiko Schocher wrote:
> updating an ubi partition needs a completely erased mtd partition,
> see:
> http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-mtd/2011-May/035416.html
>
> So, add partubi alt setting for the dfu_alt_info environment
> variable to mark this partition as an ubi partition. In case we
> update an ubi partition, we erase after flashing the image into the
> partition, the remaining sektors.
>
> Signed-off-by: Heiko Schocher <hs@denx.de>
> Cc: Pantelis Antoniou <panto@antoniou-consulting.com>
> Cc: Tom Rini <trini@ti.com>
> Cc: Lukasz Majewski <l.majewski@samsung.com>
> Cc: Kyungmin Park <kyungmin.park@samsung.com>
> Cc: Marek Vasut <marex@denx.de>
> Cc: Wolfgang Denk <wd@denx.de>
>
> ---
>
> - This patch is also a good starting point to fix up updating ubi, as
> we currently use "nand erase" for erasing the sektors. This is
> not the prefered way for writing an ubi image, see:
> http://www.linux-mtd.infradead.org/faq/ubi.html#L_flash_img
>
> This must be fixed ... we have no "ubiformat" in u-boot, or?
The lack of erase counter preservation is a problem, but the part about
ECC on erased pages is dealt with in U-Boot by the WITH_DROP_FFS flag.
> - changes for v2:
> - do not use spread = 1 for nand_erase_opts, to prevent
> errormessage if there are bad blocks in the erase range.
> ---
> drivers/dfu/dfu.c | 30 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
> drivers/dfu/dfu_nand.c | 26 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> include/dfu.h | 2 ++
> 3 Dateien ge?ndert, 57 Zeilen hinzugef?gt(+), 1 Zeile entfernt(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/dfu/dfu.c b/drivers/dfu/dfu.c
> index 0521752..7ba7026 100644
> --- a/drivers/dfu/dfu.c
> +++ b/drivers/dfu/dfu.c
> @@ -23,6 +23,7 @@
> #include <errno.h>
> #include <malloc.h>
> #include <mmc.h>
> +#include <nand.h>
> #include <fat.h>
> #include <dfu.h>
> #include <linux/list.h>
> @@ -176,6 +177,34 @@ int dfu_write(struct dfu_entity *dfu, void *buf,
> int size, int blk_seq_num)
> ret = dfu->flush_medium(dfu);
> printf("\nDFU complete CRC32: 0x%08x\n", dfu->crc);
>
> + /* in case of ubi partition, erase rest of the
> partition */
> + if (dfu->ubi == 1) {
> + int ret;
> + nand_info_t *nand;
> + /* erase complete partition */
> + nand_erase_options_t opts;
> +
> + if (nand_curr_device < 0 ||
> + nand_curr_device >=
> CONFIG_SYS_MAX_NAND_DEVICE ||
> + !nand_info[nand_curr_device].name) {
> + printf("%s: invalid nand device\n",
> __func__);
> + return -1;
> + }
> +
> + nand = &nand_info[nand_curr_device];
> +
> + memset(&opts, 0, sizeof(opts));
> + opts.offset = dfu->data.nand.start +
> dfu->offset +
> + dfu->bad_skip;
> + opts.length = dfu->data.nand.start +
> + dfu->data.nand.size -
> opts.offset;
> + ret = nand_erase_opts(nand, &opts);
> + if (ret != 0) {
> + printf("Failure erase: %d\n", ret);
> + return ret;
> + }
> + }
Instead of separately erasing the remainder of the partition, how about
recognizing up front that it's UBI (or that a full partition erase is
otherwise desired) and erasing the full partition then? Besides being
cleaner, it would be easier to convert to an ubi-aware mechanism.
-Scott
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-07-17 22:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-07-15 9:49 [U-Boot] [PATCH 1/2] dfu, nand, ubi: add partubi alt settings for updating ubi partition Heiko Schocher
2013-07-16 4:54 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH v2] " Heiko Schocher
2013-07-16 5:00 ` Marek Vasut
2013-07-16 5:11 ` Heiko Schocher
2013-07-16 7:41 ` Lukasz Majewski
2013-07-16 8:01 ` Heiko Schocher
2013-07-16 8:19 ` Lukasz Majewski
2013-07-16 15:14 ` Tom Rini
2013-07-16 15:43 ` Heiko Schocher
2013-07-17 22:35 ` Scott Wood [this message]
2013-07-18 5:01 ` Heiko Schocher
2013-07-18 6:04 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH v3] " Heiko Schocher
2013-07-18 6:57 ` Lukasz Majewski
2013-07-22 21:08 ` Scott Wood
2013-07-19 4:32 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH v4] " Heiko Schocher
2013-07-19 6:45 ` Lukasz Majewski
2013-07-19 13:54 ` Marek Vasut
2013-07-22 21:24 ` Scott Wood
2013-07-23 13:12 ` Heiko Schocher
2013-07-23 23:13 ` Scott Wood
2013-07-23 23:22 ` Scott Wood
2013-07-24 4:30 ` Heiko Schocher
2013-07-24 19:08 ` Scott Wood
2013-07-25 4:34 ` Heiko Schocher
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1374100553.8183.371@snotra \
--to=scottwood@freescale.com \
--cc=u-boot@lists.denx.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox