From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Scott Wood <scottwood@freescale.com>
Date: Wed, 17 Jul 2013 17:35:53 -0500
Subject: [U-Boot] [PATCH v2] dfu, nand,
 ubi: add partubi alt settings for updating ubi partition
In-Reply-To: <1373950449-21686-1-git-send-email-hs@denx.de> (from hs@denx.de
	on Mon Jul 15 23:54:09 2013)
References: <1373881752-22676-1-git-send-email-hs@denx.de>
	<1373950449-21686-1-git-send-email-hs@denx.de>
Message-ID: <1374100553.8183.371@snotra>
List-Id: <u-boot.lists.denx.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de

On 07/15/2013 11:54:09 PM, Heiko Schocher wrote:
> updating an ubi partition needs a completely erased mtd partition,
> see:
> http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-mtd/2011-May/035416.html
> 
> So, add partubi alt setting for the dfu_alt_info environment
> variable to mark this partition as an ubi partition. In case we
> update an ubi partition, we erase after flashing the image into the
> partition, the remaining sektors.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Heiko Schocher <hs@denx.de>
> Cc: Pantelis Antoniou <panto@antoniou-consulting.com>
> Cc: Tom Rini <trini@ti.com>
> Cc: Lukasz Majewski <l.majewski@samsung.com>
> Cc: Kyungmin Park <kyungmin.park@samsung.com>
> Cc: Marek Vasut <marex@denx.de>
> Cc: Wolfgang Denk <wd@denx.de>
> 
> ---
> 
> - This patch is also a good starting point to fix up updating ubi, as
>   we currently use "nand erase" for erasing the sektors. This is
>   not the prefered way for writing an ubi image, see:
>   http://www.linux-mtd.infradead.org/faq/ubi.html#L_flash_img
> 
>   This must be fixed ... we have no "ubiformat" in u-boot, or?

The lack of erase counter preservation is a problem, but the part about  
ECC on erased pages is dealt with in U-Boot by the WITH_DROP_FFS flag.

> - changes for v2:
>   - do not use spread = 1 for nand_erase_opts, to prevent
>     errormessage if there are bad blocks in the erase range.
> ---
>  drivers/dfu/dfu.c      | 30 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
>  drivers/dfu/dfu_nand.c | 26 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  include/dfu.h          |  2 ++
>  3 Dateien ge?ndert, 57 Zeilen hinzugef?gt(+), 1 Zeile entfernt(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/dfu/dfu.c b/drivers/dfu/dfu.c
> index 0521752..7ba7026 100644
> --- a/drivers/dfu/dfu.c
> +++ b/drivers/dfu/dfu.c
> @@ -23,6 +23,7 @@
>  #include <errno.h>
>  #include <malloc.h>
>  #include <mmc.h>
> +#include <nand.h>
>  #include <fat.h>
>  #include <dfu.h>
>  #include <linux/list.h>
> @@ -176,6 +177,34 @@ int dfu_write(struct dfu_entity *dfu, void *buf,  
> int size, int blk_seq_num)
>  			ret = dfu->flush_medium(dfu);
>  		printf("\nDFU complete CRC32: 0x%08x\n", dfu->crc);
> 
> +		/* in case of ubi partition, erase rest of the  
> partition */
> +		if (dfu->ubi == 1) {
> +			int ret;
> +			nand_info_t *nand;
> +			/* erase complete partition */
> +			nand_erase_options_t opts;
> +
> +			if (nand_curr_device < 0 ||
> +			    nand_curr_device >=  
> CONFIG_SYS_MAX_NAND_DEVICE ||
> +			    !nand_info[nand_curr_device].name) {
> +				printf("%s: invalid nand device\n",  
> __func__);
> +				return -1;
> +			}
> +
> +			nand = &nand_info[nand_curr_device];
> +
> +			memset(&opts, 0, sizeof(opts));
> +			opts.offset = dfu->data.nand.start +  
> dfu->offset +
> +					dfu->bad_skip;
> +			opts.length = dfu->data.nand.start +
> +					dfu->data.nand.size -  
> opts.offset;
> +			ret = nand_erase_opts(nand, &opts);
> +			if (ret != 0) {
> +				printf("Failure erase: %d\n", ret);
> +				return ret;
> +			}
> +		}

Instead of separately erasing the remainder of the partition, how about  
recognizing up front that it's UBI (or that a full partition erase is  
otherwise desired) and erasing the full partition then?  Besides being  
cleaner, it would be easier to convert to an ubi-aware mechanism.

-Scott