From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Scott Wood Date: Thu, 17 Oct 2013 11:12:44 -0500 Subject: [U-Boot] [ANN] U-Boot v2013.10 released In-Reply-To: <20131017121812.GB17024@bill-the-cat> References: <20131016195007.GA17401@bill-the-cat> <1381962860.7979.768.camel@snotra.buserror.net> <20131017121812.GB17024@bill-the-cat> Message-ID: <1382026364.7979.771.camel@snotra.buserror.net> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: u-boot@lists.denx.de On Thu, 2013-10-17 at 08:18 -0400, Tom Rini wrote: > On Wed, Oct 16, 2013 at 05:34:20PM -0500, Scott Wood wrote: > > On Wed, 2013-10-16 at 15:50 -0400, Tom Rini wrote: > > > The big, diffstat wise at least, change is that now instead of large > > > boilerplate messages in every file about the license we use SPDX tags in > > > all files to identify what license(s) apply here. And the source code > > > itself got trimmed down a good bit. Thanks Wolfgang! > > > > It looks like drivers/mtd/nand/nand_util.c was converted from "gpl v2 > > only, with Freescale preemptively granting permission for v2+" to just > > "v2+". Was permission obtained from the other copyright holders? > > Welp, that's a mistake. I suspect that the extra verbage from Freescale > is what threw off script Wolfgang did, so are there any other files > where Freescale granted similar rights? The only other one I put text like that in is common/cmd_nand.c (in that file, the existing copyrights had no license listed, and the code predates the update to COPYING that specified v2-or-later), and that text is still there. -Scott