From: Ian Campbell <ijc@hellion.org.uk>
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de
Subject: [U-Boot] Default initrd and fdt load behaviour on ARM (Was: Re: [linux-sunxi] Re: Not able to boot ramdisk on cubietruck)
Date: Tue, 11 Mar 2014 15:21:54 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1394551314.30915.56.camel@kazak.uk.xensource.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140311134809.GN16805@bill-the-cat>
On Tue, 2014-03-11 at 09:48 -0400, Tom Rini wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 11, 2014 at 10:38:05AM +0000, Ian Campbell wrote:
> > But what is the reason for the default behaviour of bootz doing things
> > which do not conform to linux/Documentation/arm/Booting and therefore is
> > not going to boot?
>
> Because U-Boot is more than just ARM, and ARM boards not enforcing /
> getting the correct behavour via fdt_high / initrd_high or bootm_low /
> bootm_mapsize / bootm_size / CONFIG_SYS_BOOTMAPSZ.
So you consider this to be a board level problem, rather than an arch
level one? (IOW we can't just fix this for all arm boards at once)
[...]
> > Should the global default be changed to either 0xffffffff (no
> > relocation) or to start-of-ram+256MB (which should satisfy the kernels
> > requirements without needing logic changes to handle "just after the
> > 128MB boundary" as a concept).
> >
> > Or is it intended that each board should opt-in to a sensible default
> > via their default environment?
> >
> > Does bootm suffer the same? I suspect it does, at least for fdt (since
> > initrd has a load addr in the u-boot header).
>
> SoCs should set a sane and correct set of values, using either of the
> available mechanisms. I think Tegra gets this all correct via
> CONFIG_SYS_BOOTMAPSZ and I've been meaning to whack the various TI parts
> as part of the generic distro work.
I took a look at BOOTMAPSZ on sunxi and it is using (16 << 20) which
seems sensible, if a bit small, so perhaps something else is going
wrong.
Tegra uses 256MB, might be worth giving that a go I guess.
> And keep in mind that when we set fdt/initrd_high to a non-0xffffffff
> value we're setting a maximum that's still checked vs how much we have,
> so setting base+512MB is probably a best default for cases where we may
> run on boards with varying amounts of DDR.
I'm not sure I follow -- why is +512MB best?
Thanks,
Ian.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-03-11 15:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <8c845410-b511-4866-85ac-ab0a2ec77610@googlegroups.com>
[not found] ` <c81580fd-dbcc-4b75-a9f5-72e818d2ef37@googlegroups.com>
[not found] ` <531CBA3E.8050507@schinagl.nl>
2014-03-11 10:38 ` [U-Boot] Default initrd and fdt load behaviour on ARM (Was: Re: [linux-sunxi] Re: Not able to boot ramdisk on cubietruck) Ian Campbell
2014-03-11 13:48 ` Tom Rini
2014-03-11 15:21 ` Ian Campbell [this message]
2014-03-11 17:17 ` Tom Rini
2014-03-12 13:04 ` Ian Campbell
2014-03-12 13:23 ` Tom Rini
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1394551314.30915.56.camel@kazak.uk.xensource.com \
--to=ijc@hellion.org.uk \
--cc=u-boot@lists.denx.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox