From: Chin Liang See <clsee@altera.com>
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de
Subject: [U-Boot] u-boot-socfpga repository
Date: Sun, 14 Sep 2014 20:07:11 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1410743231.2077.9.camel@clsee-VirtualBox.altera.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140914164656.GC25506@bill-the-cat>
Hi Tom,
On Sun, 2014-09-14 at 12:46 -0400, ZY - trini wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 14, 2014 at 11:02:08AM -0500, Dinh Nguyen wrote:
> > Hi Wolfgang,
> >
> > On 9/12/14, 5:51 PM, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
> > > Dear Dinh,
> > >
> > > In message <541373AD.4020902@opensource.altera.com> you wrote:
> > Also, I went back and look at the "flurry" of patches for socfpga, and I
> > must commend Tom Rini on a fantastic job for applying the patches. I was
> > only able to find 1 patch that needed addressing:
> >
> > [socfpga: generic board for socfpga] from Pavel Machek
>
> Can you test it, and Reviewed-by/Acked-by/Tested-by or something the
> patch? patchwork collects these and that is a big part of our review
> and merge process here.
>
This is actually a big patch which should be split to smaller patch.
Nevertheless, I already started reviewing it last week and hopefully can
get it reviewed by today.
> > For now, I have it applied to
> >
> > git://git.rocketboards.org/u-boot-socfpga-next.git for_next branch.
>
> Here's a difference from the Linux kernel community. We really do want
> to use a git tree hosted on git.denx.de for pulls.
>
> > There are a few patches that needs to be addressed in the mailing list,
> > but I don't see any other patches that needs to be applied at this
> > moment. Please correct me if I'm wrong.
> >
> > To summarize, have we failed as maintainers of socfpga that you would
> > need to assign somebody else to be the custodian for socfpga? If
> > so, I apologize and would like for you to reconsider your position and
> > let us try to do a better job.
>
> Just like in the kernel community, it's a position that has to be
> earned. I understand there should be big round of patches posted soon,
> which will be a good place to see follow-through. There's also the
> denali NAND patches which are blocking another SoC from going in as well
> which I'm hoping to see v10 of posted sometime in the coming week.
>
The v10 NAND patch was posted last week. In fact, the patch was working
for both Altera and Panasonic since v7. It takes up to v10 as I received
some late comments.
At same time, just fyi, there is slowness for for last few patches as I
was on paternity leave for last few weeks :)
Thanks
Chin Liang
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-09-15 1:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 68+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-09-10 23:33 [U-Boot] u-boot-socfpga repository Marek Vasut
2014-09-11 3:09 ` Masahiro Yamada
2014-09-11 4:56 ` Michal Simek
2014-09-11 5:18 ` Masahiro Yamada
2014-09-18 7:27 ` [U-Boot] U-Boot panasonic repo Marek Vasut
2014-09-18 7:58 ` Michal Simek
2014-09-18 8:02 ` Marek Vasut
2014-09-18 8:24 ` Michal Simek
2014-09-18 10:13 ` Masahiro Yamada
2014-09-18 11:44 ` Albert ARIBAUD
2014-09-18 13:32 ` Masahiro YAMADA
2014-09-18 8:32 ` Wolfgang Denk
2014-09-18 8:43 ` Masahiro Yamada
2014-09-18 9:03 ` Wolfgang Denk
[not found] ` <CAMhH57QtP7H8rx8cq--s8HqeJFq+C4xmGhh1V2RB6CvDqOiiTg@mail.gmail.com>
2014-09-27 9:01 ` Masahiro YAMADA
2014-09-27 13:00 ` Wolfgang Denk
2014-09-27 15:02 ` Masahiro YAMADA
2014-09-27 15:57 ` Wolfgang Denk
2014-09-28 5:20 ` Masahiro YAMADA
2014-09-11 7:46 ` [U-Boot] u-boot-socfpga repository Wolfgang Denk
2014-09-11 7:55 ` Pavel Machek
2014-09-11 15:39 ` Marek Vasut
2014-09-11 16:01 ` Dinh Nguyen
2014-09-11 17:21 ` Marek Vasut
2014-09-16 9:56 ` Pavel Machek
2014-09-17 11:54 ` Chin Liang See
2014-09-19 9:54 ` Chin Liang See
2014-09-23 12:54 ` Tom Rini
2014-09-23 13:43 ` Wolfgang Denk
2014-09-23 13:46 ` Tom Rini
2014-09-23 14:30 ` Wolfgang Denk
2014-09-11 15:45 ` Marek Vasut
2014-09-11 16:14 ` Dinh Nguyen
2014-09-11 16:51 ` Marek Vasut
2014-09-11 23:14 ` Dinh Nguyen
2014-09-11 17:14 ` Tom Rini
2014-09-11 23:19 ` Dinh Nguyen
2014-09-12 5:25 ` Wolfgang Denk
2014-09-12 18:27 ` Dinh Nguyen
2014-09-12 19:46 ` Wolfgang Denk
2014-09-12 21:15 ` Dinh Nguyen
2014-09-12 22:14 ` Wolfgang Denk
2014-09-12 22:29 ` Dinh Nguyen
2014-09-12 22:51 ` Wolfgang Denk
2014-09-14 16:02 ` Dinh Nguyen
2014-09-14 16:46 ` Tom Rini
2014-09-15 1:07 ` Chin Liang See [this message]
2014-09-15 1:27 ` Marek Vasut
2014-09-15 1:43 ` Chin Liang See
2014-09-15 1:47 ` Marek Vasut
2014-09-14 16:51 ` Wolfgang Denk
2014-09-12 19:57 ` Michael Trimarchi
2014-09-12 21:05 ` David Hawkins
2014-09-12 21:20 ` Michael Trimarchi
2014-09-12 21:23 ` David Hawkins
2014-09-12 21:30 ` Michael Trimarchi
2014-09-12 21:32 ` Dinh Nguyen
2014-09-12 22:37 ` Wolfgang Denk
2014-09-15 1:35 ` Chin Liang See
2014-09-15 8:53 ` [U-Boot] mainline u-boot on socfpga Pavel Machek
2014-09-13 17:24 ` [U-Boot] u-boot-socfpga repository David Hawkins
2014-09-14 15:39 ` Dinh Nguyen
2014-09-14 16:30 ` Wolfgang Denk
2014-09-14 20:04 ` David Hawkins
2014-09-13 0:16 ` David Hawkins
2014-09-12 18:00 ` Michal Simek
2014-09-12 19:45 ` Wolfgang Denk
2014-09-11 15:46 ` Marek Vasut
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1410743231.2077.9.camel@clsee-VirtualBox.altera.com \
--to=clsee@altera.com \
--cc=u-boot@lists.denx.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox