From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Ian Campbell Date: Sat, 04 Oct 2014 10:32:04 +0100 Subject: [U-Boot] [PATCH for-next 0/3] sunxi: Kconfig consolidation and cleanup In-Reply-To: <1412412466.17796.65.camel@hellion.org.uk> References: <1412412466.17796.65.camel@hellion.org.uk> Message-ID: <1412415124.12707.2.camel@hellion.org.uk> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: u-boot@lists.denx.de On Sat, 2014-10-04 at 09:47 +0100, Ian Campbell wrote: > Probably the board [...] selection could be moved out > without any dependencies, although the board one in particular will be > quite a big patch I think it would be worth it. On the topic of board selection which way round should the SoC vs. board options be arrange? Should we have invisible TARGET_SUN?I options which are selected by each board, or should we have the boards depend on the appropriate TARGET? In the first case a user would need to choose from a pretty long list of boards, in the second case they would need to know which SoC the board has. I'm leaning towards the first. I don't think either would be an impediment to an eventually single common binary which I'm imagining would appear as a "Generic board" option which depends/selects all appropriate SoCs. Ian.