From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Ian Campbell <ijc@hellion.org.uk>
Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2014 09:14:18 +0100
Subject: [U-Boot] [PATCH] Revert "sunxi: dram: Use divisor P=1 for PLL5"
In-Reply-To: <20141021205842.GC25506@bill-the-cat>
References: <1413367931-4224-1-git-send-email-hdegoede@redhat.com>
	<20141015133420.75921bd7@i7> <543F8662.9060805@redhat.com>
	<20141021205842.GC25506@bill-the-cat>
Message-ID: <1413965658.20604.44.camel@hellion.org.uk>
List-Id: <u-boot.lists.denx.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de

On Tue, 2014-10-21 at 16:58 -0400, Tom Rini wrote:
> We should be doing things right, in mainline.  To bring up a different
> example, on TI OMAP4 parts at least for a long time in order to use
> mainline U-Boot on older kernels you had to manually add
> CONFIG_SOMETHING_OR_ANOTHER to enable additional clocks/mux that the old
> kernels had incorrectly relied on U-Boot to set.  If we must do strange
> things to support old and incorrect but in the wild kernels we need to
> (a) make it opt-in (easier now with Kconfig!) and (b) schedule a removal
> of the hack all the same.

A Kconfig option does sound like a reasonable compromise.

Ian.