From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Scott Wood Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2014 00:24:06 -0600 Subject: [U-Boot] [PATCH] mtd: nand: revive "nand scrub" command In-Reply-To: <548FCF5F.9020809@denx.de> References: <1418334191.5581.58.camel@freescale.com> <548A88E9.5030203@denx.de> <20141215195407.0531.AA925319@jp.panasonic.com> <201412151213.19794.marex@denx.de> <1418684896.5581.76.camel@freescale.com> <20141216012619.GJ20704@bill-the-cat> <548FCF5F.9020809@denx.de> Message-ID: <1418711046.5581.90.camel@freescale.com> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: u-boot@lists.denx.de On Tue, 2014-12-16 at 07:21 +0100, Heiko Schocher wrote: > Hello Tom, Scott, > > Am 16.12.2014 02:26, schrieb Tom Rini: > > As we're neck deep in "See? Scott was right" I'm inclined to go with > > what Scott is saying. We tried it, it actively didn't work, lets step > > back, evaluate and move along. > > Ok, I have no objections against that, it was just my point of view ... > > And yes, I missed here and there some pieces when syncing with > linux 3.14 ... sorry for that, but I could not test every scenario for > every board ... and we had no clean base for using git, which at last > in my attempt ended in a big mess when syncing with linux ... so I started > more or less from scratch ... I understand that for some of the mtd parts, but the nand code did have a relatively clean base. > So ... > > Who will send a "delete ifdef" patch? I will. > Who will test, how a resync with linux (saying 3.17 ?) work now with git? > > If this test is done, we can decide, which way is the "way to go" ... ? I'll try a 3.18 sync soon. -Scott