From: Scott Wood <scottwood@freescale.com>
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de
Subject: [U-Boot] [PATCH v2 1/2] Errata/ARM57: Add basic constructs to handle and apply A57 specific erratas
Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2015 14:40:56 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1421354456.4961.156.camel@freescale.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1421243215-4277-1-git-send-email-bhupesh.sharma@freescale.com>
On Wed, 2015-01-14 at 19:16 +0530, Bhupesh Sharma wrote:
> This patch adds basic constructs in the ARMv8 u-boot code
> to handle and apply Cortex-A57 specific erratas.
>
> As and example, the framework showcases how erratas 833069, 826974
> and 828024 can be handled and applied.
>
> Later on this framework can be extended to include other
> erratas.
>
> Signed-off-by: Bhupesh Sharma <bhupesh.sharma@freescale.com>
> ---
> Changes from v1:
> - Addressed York's comment about x29 usage and calling the
> core errata fxup function before the lowlevel_init function
> is called.
>
> arch/arm/cpu/armv8/start.S | 51 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> arch/arm/include/asm/macro.h | 20 +++++++++++++++++
> 2 files changed, 71 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm/cpu/armv8/start.S b/arch/arm/cpu/armv8/start.S
> index 4b11aa4..df532f9 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/cpu/armv8/start.S
> +++ b/arch/arm/cpu/armv8/start.S
> @@ -67,6 +67,9 @@ reset:
> msr cpacr_el1, x0 /* Enable FP/SIMD */
> 0:
>
> + /* Apply ARM core specific erratas */
> + bl apply_core_errata
> +
> /*
> * Cache/BPB/TLB Invalidate
> * i-cache is invalidated before enabled in icache_enable()
> @@ -97,6 +100,54 @@ master_cpu:
>
> /*-----------------------------------------------------------------------*/
>
> +WEAK(apply_core_errata)
> +
> + /* For now, we support Cortex-A57 specific errata only */
> +
> + /* Check if we are running on a Cortex-A57 core */
> + branch_if_a57_core x0, 1f
> + b 2f
> +1:
> + bl apply_a57_core_errata
> +
> +2:
This is awkward. How often are you expecting to use this macro? Why
not just open-code it? Or at least make it "branch_if_not_a57_core".
Or fix your lr problem by doing "branch_if_a57_core
apply_a57_core_errata" and having it branch back rather than "ret".
But I think opencoding would be best. Just define symbols for the
actual core IDs.
> +WEAK(apply_a57_core_errata)
Why is this weak?
-Scott
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-01-15 20:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-01-14 13:46 [U-Boot] [PATCH v2 1/2] Errata/ARM57: Add basic constructs to handle and apply A57 specific erratas Bhupesh Sharma
2015-01-14 13:46 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH v2 2/2] configs/ls2085a: Add support for Cortex-A57 erratas Bhupesh Sharma
2015-01-14 16:14 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH v2 1/2] Errata/ARM57: Add basic constructs to handle and apply A57 specific erratas York Sun
2015-01-15 6:10 ` bhupesh.sharma at freescale.com
2015-01-15 19:05 ` Mark Rutland
2015-01-15 19:15 ` bhupesh.sharma at freescale.com
2015-01-15 19:15 ` York Sun
2015-01-15 20:40 ` Scott Wood [this message]
2015-01-16 13:51 ` Arnab Basu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1421354456.4961.156.camel@freescale.com \
--to=scottwood@freescale.com \
--cc=u-boot@lists.denx.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox