[U-Boot] [PATCH] mmc: fsl_esdhc fix register offset

[Joakim Tjernlund <joakim.tjernlund@transmode.se>]

On Wed, 2015-03-11 at 15:55 +0200, Pantelis Antoniou wrote:
> Hi Peng,
> 
> 
> > On Mar 11, 2015, at 04:17 , Peng Fan <Peng.Fan@freescale.com> wrote:
> > 
> > Hi, Marek
> > 
> > On 3/11/2015 10:03 AM, Marek Vasut wrote:
> > > On Wednesday, March 11, 2015 at 01:58:37 AM, Peng Fan wrote:
> > > > Hi, Marek
> > > Hi!
> > > 
> > > > On 3/10/2015 9:45 PM, Marek Vasut wrote:
> > > > > On Tuesday, March 10, 2015 at 08:35:46 AM, Peng Fan wrote:
> > > > > > Commit f022d36e8a4517b2a9d25ff2d75bd2459d0c68b1 introduces
> > > > > > error register offset.
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > Change the "char reserved3[59]" to "char reserved3[56]".
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > Signed-off-by: Peng Fan <Peng.Fan@freescale.com>
> > > > > This should probably be applied to 2015.04 .
> > > > > 
> > > > > What are the symptoms of this bug please ?
> > > > I just found the reserved3 size is wrong, did not do test.
> > > >  From the driver, only the entry 'scr' of fsl_esdhc below reserved3 is
> > > > used, so the offset of scr is wrong if using `char reserved3[59]`
> > > Uh, is the patch tested at all on real hardware ?
> > Still not test on real hardware. From commit f022d36e8a4517b2a9d25ff2d75bd2459d0c68b1,
> > "
> >        uint    adsaddr;        /* ADMA system address register */
> > -       char    reserved2[160]; /* reserved */
> > +       char    reserved2[100]; /* reserved */
> > +       uint    vendorspec;     /* Vendor Specific register */
> > +       char    reserved3[59];  /* reserved */
> >        uint    hostver;        /* Host controller version register */
> > "
> > It's clear that 160 bytes does not equal with (100 + 4 + 59)bytes.
> > > 
> > > Best regards,
> > > Marek Vasut
> > Regards,
> > Peng.
> 
> Although I agree with fixing this, I?m kinda scared about how fragile structs for describing hardware 
> registers are.
> 
> But we?re stuck with it I guess.
> 

Without this patch my emmc (T1042)is broken beyond repair, please commit.