* [U-Boot] [PATCH] usb: Early failure when the first descriptor read fails, one way or another
@ 2015-03-28 17:23 Paul Kocialkowski
2015-03-28 17:26 ` Marek Vasut
0 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread
From: Paul Kocialkowski @ 2015-03-28 17:23 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: u-boot
When using an USB1 device on a controller that only supports USB2 (e.g. EHCI),
reading the first descriptor will fail (read 0 byte), so we can abort the
process at this point instead of failing later and wasting time.
Signed-off-by: Paul Kocialkowski <contact@paulk.fr>
---
common/usb.c | 5 ++++-
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/common/usb.c b/common/usb.c
index 32e15cd..d1b3316 100644
--- a/common/usb.c
+++ b/common/usb.c
@@ -950,7 +950,7 @@ int usb_new_device(struct usb_device *dev)
*/
#ifndef CONFIG_USB_XHCI
err = usb_get_descriptor(dev, USB_DT_DEVICE, 0, desc, 64);
- if (err < 0) {
+ if (err < sizeof(struct usb_device_descriptor)) {
debug("usb_new_device: usb_get_descriptor() failed\n");
return 1;
}
@@ -990,6 +990,9 @@ int usb_new_device(struct usb_device *dev)
case 64:
dev->maxpacketsize = PACKET_SIZE_64;
break;
+ default:
+ debug("usb_new_device: invalid max packet size\n");
+ return 1;
}
dev->devnum = addr;
--
1.9.1
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* [U-Boot] [PATCH] usb: Early failure when the first descriptor read fails, one way or another
2015-03-28 17:23 [U-Boot] [PATCH] usb: Early failure when the first descriptor read fails, one way or another Paul Kocialkowski
@ 2015-03-28 17:26 ` Marek Vasut
2015-03-28 17:31 ` Paul Kocialkowski
0 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread
From: Marek Vasut @ 2015-03-28 17:26 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: u-boot
On Saturday, March 28, 2015 at 06:23:58 PM, Paul Kocialkowski wrote:
> When using an USB1 device on a controller that only supports USB2 (e.g.
> EHCI), reading the first descriptor will fail (read 0 byte), so we can
> abort the process at this point instead of failing later and wasting time.
>
> Signed-off-by: Paul Kocialkowski <contact@paulk.fr>
> ---
> common/usb.c | 5 ++++-
> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/common/usb.c b/common/usb.c
> index 32e15cd..d1b3316 100644
> --- a/common/usb.c
> +++ b/common/usb.c
> @@ -950,7 +950,7 @@ int usb_new_device(struct usb_device *dev)
> */
> #ifndef CONFIG_USB_XHCI
> err = usb_get_descriptor(dev, USB_DT_DEVICE, 0, desc, 64);
> - if (err < 0) {
> + if (err < sizeof(struct usb_device_descriptor)) {
> debug("usb_new_device: usb_get_descriptor() failed\n");
> return 1;
> }
> @@ -990,6 +990,9 @@ int usb_new_device(struct usb_device *dev)
> case 64:
> dev->maxpacketsize = PACKET_SIZE_64;
> break;
> + default:
> + debug("usb_new_device: invalid max packet size\n");
Hi,
since this is an error, this should probably be a printf(). Also,
to make the error message useful, it should state the invalid value
due to which it failed.
Thanks!
> + return 1;
> }
> dev->devnum = addr;
Best regards,
Marek Vasut
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* [U-Boot] [PATCH] usb: Early failure when the first descriptor read fails, one way or another
2015-03-28 17:26 ` Marek Vasut
@ 2015-03-28 17:31 ` Paul Kocialkowski
2015-03-29 10:30 ` Paul Kocialkowski
2015-03-29 23:47 ` Marek Vasut
0 siblings, 2 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Paul Kocialkowski @ 2015-03-28 17:31 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: u-boot
Le samedi 28 mars 2015 ? 18:26 +0100, Marek Vasut a ?crit :
> On Saturday, March 28, 2015 at 06:23:58 PM, Paul Kocialkowski wrote:
> > When using an USB1 device on a controller that only supports USB2 (e.g.
> > EHCI), reading the first descriptor will fail (read 0 byte), so we can
> > abort the process at this point instead of failing later and wasting time.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Paul Kocialkowski <contact@paulk.fr>
> > ---
> > common/usb.c | 5 ++++-
> > 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/common/usb.c b/common/usb.c
> > index 32e15cd..d1b3316 100644
> > --- a/common/usb.c
> > +++ b/common/usb.c
> > @@ -950,7 +950,7 @@ int usb_new_device(struct usb_device *dev)
> > */
> > #ifndef CONFIG_USB_XHCI
> > err = usb_get_descriptor(dev, USB_DT_DEVICE, 0, desc, 64);
> > - if (err < 0) {
> > + if (err < sizeof(struct usb_device_descriptor)) {
> > debug("usb_new_device: usb_get_descriptor() failed\n");
> > return 1;
> > }
> > @@ -990,6 +990,9 @@ int usb_new_device(struct usb_device *dev)
> > case 64:
> > dev->maxpacketsize = PACKET_SIZE_64;
> > break;
> > + default:
> > + debug("usb_new_device: invalid max packet size\n");
>
> Hi,
>
> since this is an error, this should probably be a printf(). Also,
> to make the error message useful, it should state the invalid value
> due to which it failed.
Well, it is not unexpected behaviour in my use case (but I reckon it may
be generally speaking). Plugging an USB1 device on a controller that
doesn't support USB1 should normally fail, this is not some kind of
run-time error.
When this happens in Linux, it just fails (silently) and tries ohci
instead. I'm afraid there is no such mechanism in U-Boot, so the best we
can do is to treat the device as unsupported.
If you're not convinced by this, I can still make a v2 with printf, I
just don't think it's a necessity.
> Thanks!
>
> > + return 1;
> > }
> > dev->devnum = addr;
>
> Best regards,
> Marek Vasut
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 819 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/attachments/20150328/761a9c72/attachment.sig>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* [U-Boot] [PATCH] usb: Early failure when the first descriptor read fails, one way or another
2015-03-28 17:31 ` Paul Kocialkowski
@ 2015-03-29 10:30 ` Paul Kocialkowski
2015-03-29 23:47 ` Marek Vasut
1 sibling, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Paul Kocialkowski @ 2015-03-29 10:30 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: u-boot
> > > @@ -990,6 +990,9 @@ int usb_new_device(struct usb_device *dev)
> > > case 64:
> > > dev->maxpacketsize = PACKET_SIZE_64;
> > > break;
> > > + default:
> > > + debug("usb_new_device: invalid max packet size\n");
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > since this is an error, this should probably be a printf(). Also,
> > to make the error message useful, it should state the invalid value
> > due to which it failed.
>
> Well, it is not unexpected behaviour in my use case (but I reckon it may
> be generally speaking). Plugging an USB1 device on a controller that
> doesn't support USB1 should normally fail, this is not some kind of
> run-time error.
>
> When this happens in Linux, it just fails (silently) and tries ohci
> instead. I'm afraid there is no such mechanism in U-Boot, so the best we
> can do is to treat the device as unsupported.
>
> If you're not convinced by this, I can still make a v2 with printf, I
> just don't think it's a necessity.
Nervermind this, I have sent out a v2 addressing you concern.
> > Thanks!
> >
> > > + return 1;
> > > }
> > > dev->devnum = addr;
--
Paul Kocialkowski, Replicant developer
Replicant is a fully free Android distribution running on several
devices, a free software mobile operating system putting the emphasis on
freedom and privacy/security.
Website: http://www.replicant.us/
Blog: http://blog.replicant.us/
Wiki/tracker/forums: http://redmine.replicant.us/
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 819 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/attachments/20150329/c5622822/attachment.sig>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* [U-Boot] [PATCH] usb: Early failure when the first descriptor read fails, one way or another
2015-03-28 17:31 ` Paul Kocialkowski
2015-03-29 10:30 ` Paul Kocialkowski
@ 2015-03-29 23:47 ` Marek Vasut
2015-03-30 13:35 ` Paul Kocialkowski
1 sibling, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread
From: Marek Vasut @ 2015-03-29 23:47 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: u-boot
On Saturday, March 28, 2015 at 06:31:42 PM, Paul Kocialkowski wrote:
> Le samedi 28 mars 2015 ? 18:26 +0100, Marek Vasut a ?crit :
> > On Saturday, March 28, 2015 at 06:23:58 PM, Paul Kocialkowski wrote:
> > > When using an USB1 device on a controller that only supports USB2 (e.g.
> > > EHCI), reading the first descriptor will fail (read 0 byte), so we can
> > > abort the process at this point instead of failing later and wasting
> > > time.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Paul Kocialkowski <contact@paulk.fr>
> > > ---
> > >
> > > common/usb.c | 5 ++++-
> > > 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/common/usb.c b/common/usb.c
> > > index 32e15cd..d1b3316 100644
> > > --- a/common/usb.c
> > > +++ b/common/usb.c
> > > @@ -950,7 +950,7 @@ int usb_new_device(struct usb_device *dev)
> > >
> > > */
> > >
> > > #ifndef CONFIG_USB_XHCI
> > >
> > > err = usb_get_descriptor(dev, USB_DT_DEVICE, 0, desc, 64);
> > >
> > > - if (err < 0) {
> > > + if (err < sizeof(struct usb_device_descriptor)) {
> > >
> > > debug("usb_new_device: usb_get_descriptor() failed\n");
> > > return 1;
> > >
> > > }
> > >
> > > @@ -990,6 +990,9 @@ int usb_new_device(struct usb_device *dev)
> > >
> > > case 64:
> > > dev->maxpacketsize = PACKET_SIZE_64;
> > > break;
> > >
> > > + default:
> > > + debug("usb_new_device: invalid max packet size\n");
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > since this is an error, this should probably be a printf(). Also,
> > to make the error message useful, it should state the invalid value
> > due to which it failed.
>
> Well, it is not unexpected behaviour in my use case (but I reckon it may
> be generally speaking).
Why is this not unexpected in your case please ?
> Plugging an USB1 device on a controller that
> doesn't support USB1 should normally fail, this is not some kind of
> run-time error.
Yes.
> When this happens in Linux, it just fails (silently) and tries ohci
> instead. I'm afraid there is no such mechanism in U-Boot, so the best we
> can do is to treat the device as unsupported.
There's no such mechanism indeed. It'd be nice if someone implemented
this handover though.
> If you're not convinced by this, I can still make a v2 with printf, I
> just don't think it's a necessity.
Let me just understand what you're seeing a bit better first please .
Best regards,
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* [U-Boot] [PATCH] usb: Early failure when the first descriptor read fails, one way or another
2015-03-29 23:47 ` Marek Vasut
@ 2015-03-30 13:35 ` Paul Kocialkowski
2015-04-03 2:01 ` Marek Vasut
0 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread
From: Paul Kocialkowski @ 2015-03-30 13:35 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: u-boot
Le lundi 30 mars 2015 ? 01:47 +0200, Marek Vasut a ?crit :
> On Saturday, March 28, 2015 at 06:31:42 PM, Paul Kocialkowski wrote:
> > Le samedi 28 mars 2015 ? 18:26 +0100, Marek Vasut a ?crit :
> > > On Saturday, March 28, 2015 at 06:23:58 PM, Paul Kocialkowski wrote:
> > > > When using an USB1 device on a controller that only supports USB2 (e.g.
> > > > EHCI), reading the first descriptor will fail (read 0 byte), so we can
> > > > abort the process at this point instead of failing later and wasting
> > > > time.
> > > >
> > > > Signed-off-by: Paul Kocialkowski <contact@paulk.fr>
> > > > ---
> > > >
> > > > common/usb.c | 5 ++++-
> > > > 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > > >
> > > > diff --git a/common/usb.c b/common/usb.c
> > > > index 32e15cd..d1b3316 100644
> > > > --- a/common/usb.c
> > > > +++ b/common/usb.c
> > > > @@ -950,7 +950,7 @@ int usb_new_device(struct usb_device *dev)
> > > >
> > > > */
> > > >
> > > > #ifndef CONFIG_USB_XHCI
> > > >
> > > > err = usb_get_descriptor(dev, USB_DT_DEVICE, 0, desc, 64);
> > > >
> > > > - if (err < 0) {
> > > > + if (err < sizeof(struct usb_device_descriptor)) {
> > > >
> > > > debug("usb_new_device: usb_get_descriptor() failed\n");
> > > > return 1;
> > > >
> > > > }
> > > >
> > > > @@ -990,6 +990,9 @@ int usb_new_device(struct usb_device *dev)
> > > >
> > > > case 64:
> > > > dev->maxpacketsize = PACKET_SIZE_64;
> > > > break;
> > > >
> > > > + default:
> > > > + debug("usb_new_device: invalid max packet size\n");
> > >
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > since this is an error, this should probably be a printf(). Also,
> > > to make the error message useful, it should state the invalid value
> > > due to which it failed.
> >
> > Well, it is not unexpected behaviour in my use case (but I reckon it may
> > be generally speaking).
>
> Why is this not unexpected in your case please ?
Because using an USB low speed device with an EHCI controller should
normally fail (that is, the first descriptor read returns 0 bytes), or
at least it does on the sunxi platforms. I thought there was no need to
report that as an error, but I changed my mind.
Since the end result is that the USB device won't work, I think it makes
sense to print an error.
> > If you're not convinced by this, I can still make a v2 with printf, I
> > just don't think it's a necessity.
>
> Let me just understand what you're seeing a bit better first please .
At this point, v2 of this patch was sent as: usb: Early failure when the
first descriptor read fails or is invalid
Let me know if you need some more context on this.
--
Paul Kocialkowski, Replicant developer
Replicant is a fully free Android distribution running on several
devices, a free software mobile operating system putting the emphasis on
freedom and privacy/security.
Website: http://www.replicant.us/
Blog: http://blog.replicant.us/
Wiki/tracker/forums: http://redmine.replicant.us/
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 819 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/attachments/20150330/ff2a52f6/attachment.sig>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* [U-Boot] [PATCH] usb: Early failure when the first descriptor read fails, one way or another
2015-03-30 13:35 ` Paul Kocialkowski
@ 2015-04-03 2:01 ` Marek Vasut
0 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Marek Vasut @ 2015-04-03 2:01 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: u-boot
On Monday, March 30, 2015 at 03:35:03 PM, Paul Kocialkowski wrote:
> Le lundi 30 mars 2015 ? 01:47 +0200, Marek Vasut a ?crit :
[...]
> > > > Hi,
> > > >
> > > > since this is an error, this should probably be a printf(). Also,
> > > > to make the error message useful, it should state the invalid value
> > > > due to which it failed.
> > >
> > > Well, it is not unexpected behaviour in my use case (but I reckon it
> > > may be generally speaking).
> >
> > Why is this not unexpected in your case please ?
>
> Because using an USB low speed device with an EHCI controller should
> normally fail (that is, the first descriptor read returns 0 bytes), or
> at least it does on the sunxi platforms. I thought there was no need to
> report that as an error, but I changed my mind.
Indeed.
> Since the end result is that the USB device won't work, I think it makes
> sense to print an error.
Yes, I agree.
> > > If you're not convinced by this, I can still make a v2 with printf, I
> > > just don't think it's a necessity.
> >
> > Let me just understand what you're seeing a bit better first please .
>
> At this point, v2 of this patch was sent as: usb: Early failure when the
> first descriptor read fails or is invalid
>
> Let me know if you need some more context on this.
This is OK, thank you for clarifying !
Best regards,
Marek Vasut
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2015-04-03 2:01 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2015-03-28 17:23 [U-Boot] [PATCH] usb: Early failure when the first descriptor read fails, one way or another Paul Kocialkowski
2015-03-28 17:26 ` Marek Vasut
2015-03-28 17:31 ` Paul Kocialkowski
2015-03-29 10:30 ` Paul Kocialkowski
2015-03-29 23:47 ` Marek Vasut
2015-03-30 13:35 ` Paul Kocialkowski
2015-04-03 2:01 ` Marek Vasut
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox