From: Scott Wood <scottwood@freescale.com>
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de
Subject: [U-Boot] [PATCH] nand: mxs_nand_spl: support use of env in SPL
Date: Wed, 13 May 2015 18:38:02 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1431560282.3868.113.camel@freescale.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1431121147-27733-1-git-send-email-tharvey@gateworks.com>
On Fri, 2015-05-08 at 14:39 -0700, Tim Harvey wrote:
> -int nand_spl_load_image(uint32_t offs, unsigned int size, void *buf)
> +int mtd_read(struct mtd_info *mtd, loff_t offs, size_t size, size_t *retlen,
> + uchar *buf)
> {
> struct nand_chip *chip;
> unsigned int page;
> unsigned int nand_page_per_block;
> unsigned int sz = 0;
> + nand_info_t *info = &nand_info[0];
Any reason not to use the passed-in mtd pointer (and fix the
nand_spl_load_image wrapper to pass in &nand_info[0])?
> +/* setup mtd and nand structs and init mxs_nand driver */
> +static int mxs_nand_init(void)
> +{
> + nand_info_t *info = &nand_info[0];
> +
> + /* return if already initalized */
> + if (nand_chip.numchips)
> + return 0;
> +
> + /* init mxs nand driver */
> + board_nand_init(&nand_chip);
> + info->priv = &nand_chip;
> + /* set mtd functions */
> + nand_chip.cmdfunc = mxs_nand_command;
> + nand_chip.numchips = 1;
> +
> + /* identify flash device */
> + puts("NAND : ");
> + if (mxs_flash_ident(info)) {
> + printf("Failed to identify\n");
> + return -1;
> + }
> +
> + /* allocate and initialize buffers */
> + nand_chip.buffers = memalign(ARCH_DMA_MINALIGN,
> + sizeof(*nand_chip.buffers));
> + nand_chip.oob_poi = nand_chip.buffers->databuf + info->writesize;
> + /* setup flash layout (does not scan as we override that) */
> + info->size = nand_chip.chipsize;
> + nand_chip.scan_bbt(info);
> +
> + printf("%llu MiB\n", (info->size / (1024 * 1024)));
> + return 0;
> +}
Why did this function need to be moved?
> +int nand_spl_load_image(uint32_t offs, unsigned int size, void *buf)
> +{
> + return mtd_read(NULL, offs, size, NULL, buf);
> +}
It'd be nice to keep the wrapper near the function it wraps.
I don't see any other such wrappers; is there no other driver that
currently works with SPL env?
> int nand_default_bbt(struct mtd_info *mtd)
> {
> return 0;
> @@ -223,6 +232,7 @@ int nand_default_bbt(struct mtd_info *mtd)
>
> void nand_init(void)
> {
> + mxs_nand_init();
> }
Do you still need the "return if already initialized" check with this
change? How is this change related to the rest?
-Scott
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-05-13 23:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-05-08 21:39 [U-Boot] [PATCH] nand: mxs_nand_spl: support use of env in SPL Tim Harvey
2015-05-13 16:56 ` Tim Harvey
2015-05-13 23:38 ` Scott Wood [this message]
2015-05-14 15:12 ` Tim Harvey
2015-05-14 18:10 ` Scott Wood
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1431560282.3868.113.camel@freescale.com \
--to=scottwood@freescale.com \
--cc=u-boot@lists.denx.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox