From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Andrei Yakimov <ayakimov@iptec-inc.com>
Date: Wed, 20 May 2015 20:03:47 -0700
Subject: [U-Boot] Fix fsl_elbc_nand driver
In-Reply-To: <1432176380.27761.182.camel@freescale.com>
References: <1432001789.14341.120.camel@andreilinux>
 <1432071614.27761.77.camel@freescale.com>
 <1432074568.14341.149.camel@andreilinux>
 <1432075134.27761.82.camel@freescale.com>
 <1432078969.14341.178.camel@andreilinux>
 <1432160719.27761.108.camel@freescale.com>
 <1432171628.14341.246.camel@andreilinux>
 <1432172233.27761.147.camel@freescale.com>
 <1432173354.14341.258.camel@andreilinux>
 <1432175221.27761.176.camel@freescale.com>
 <1432176178.14341.267.camel@andreilinux>
 <1432176380.27761.182.camel@freescale.com>
Message-ID: <1432177427.14341.279.camel@andreilinux>
List-Id: <u-boot.lists.denx.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de

On Wed, 2015-05-20 at 21:46 -0500, Scott Wood wrote:
> On Wed, 2015-05-20 at 19:42 -0700, Andrei Yakimov wrote:
> > For now lets stick with 1536 in u-boot.
> > I will send a patch.
> > At least it will not loosing flash over time
> > as nand ages.
> > 
> > I understand what you wish, and will take a look
> > on it inside fresh new kernel. I found one more driver  -
> > marvel looks like have same problem.
> > I will check how NAND_CMD_RNDOUT is working.
> > Perhaps we do not need extra read_param(),
> > and use only NAND_CMD_RNDOUT to get next
> > block inside page loop.
> 
> Again, I'm a reluctant to use RNDOUT in the default read_param() because
> that would change the flow for all controllers and chips, and while the
> chip manual I'm looking at says it's OK, it introduces risk that it
> doesn't work everywhere (e.g. some controller drivers that provide their
> own cmdfunc don't implement RNDOUT).
Forget about read_param(), 
just like this:
  for (i = 0; i < 3; i++) {
                for (j = 0; j < sizeof(*p); j++)
                        ((uint8_t *)p)[j] = chip->read_byte(mtd);
                if (onfi_crc16(ONFI_CRC_BASE, (uint8_t *)p, 254) ==
                                le16_to_cpu(p->crc)) {
                        break;
                }
		chip->cmdfunc(mtd, NAND_CMD_RNDOUT, 0, -1);
  }


and this is good - will be "no op"  or "bad command" error,
which could be ignored - so for this drivers operation flow is
unchanged.
> -Scott
> 
> 
I am still learning git/patman.
It will be day or two while I figure out patman.
By some reason after "git commit --amend" patman kill my patch.
I am missing something.
Andrei