From: "Benoît Thébaudeau" <benoit.thebaudeau@advansee.com>
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de
Subject: [U-Boot] [PATCH v2 2/5] ehci-hcd: Boost transfer speed
Date: Fri, 20 Jul 2012 17:35:26 +0200 (CEST) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1432817777.341004.1342798526523.JavaMail.root@advansee.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <50097601.5000603@herbrechtsmeier.net>
On Friday 20 July 2012 17:15:13 Stefan Herbrechtsmeier wrote:
> Am 20.07.2012 17:03, schrieb Beno?t Th?baudeau:
> > On Friday 20 July 2012 16:51:33 Stefan Herbrechtsmeier wrote:
> >> Am 20.07.2012 15:56, schrieb Beno?t Th?baudeau:
> >>> Dear Marek Vasut,
> >>>
> >>> On Friday 20 July 2012 15:44:01 Marek Vasut wrote:
> >>>>> On Friday 20 July 2012 13:37:37 Stefan Herbrechtsmeier wrote:
> >>>>>> Am 20.07.2012 13:26, schrieb Beno?t Th?baudeau:
> >>>>>>> + int xfr_bytes = min(left_length,
> >>>>>>> + (QT_BUFFER_CNT * 4096 -
> >>>>>>> + ((uint32_t)buf_ptr & 4095)) &
> >>>>>>> + ~4095);
> >>>>>> Why you align the length to 4096?
> >>>>> It's to guarantee that each transfer length is a multiple of
> >>>>> the
> >>>>> max packet
> >>>>> length. Otherwise, early short packets are issued, which breaks
> >>>>> the
> >>>>> transfer and results in time-out error messages.
> >>>> Early short packets ? What do you mean?
> >>> During a USB transfer, all packets must have a length of max
> >>> packet
> >>> length for
> >>> the pipe/endpoint, except the final one that can be a short
> >>> packet.
> >>> Without the
> >>> alignment I make for xfr_bytes, short packets can occur within a
> >>> transfer,
> >>> because the hardware starts a new packet for each new queued qTD
> >>> it
> >>> handles.
> >> But if I am right, the max packet length is 512 for bulk and 1024
> >> for
> >> Interrupt transfer.
> > There are indeed different max packet lengths for different
> > transfer types, but
> > it does not matter since the chosen alignment guarantees a multiple
> > of all these
> > possible max packet lengths.
> But thereby you limit the transfer to 4 qT buffers for unaligned
> transfers.
Not exactly. The 5 qt_buffers are used for page-unaligned buffers, but that
results in only 4 full pages of unaligned data, requiring 5 aligned pages.
For page-aligned buffers, the 5 qt_buffers result in 5 full pages of aligned
data.
The unaligned case could be a little bit improved to always use as many packets
as possible per qTD, but that would over-complicate things for a very negligible
speed and memory gain.
Best regards,
Beno?t
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-07-20 15:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 37+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-07-19 20:17 [U-Boot] [PATCH 2/5] ehci-hcd: Boost transfer speed Benoît Thébaudeau
2012-07-20 11:26 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH v2 " Benoît Thébaudeau
2012-07-20 11:37 ` Stefan Herbrechtsmeier
2012-07-20 13:17 ` Benoît Thébaudeau
2012-07-20 13:44 ` Marek Vasut
2012-07-20 13:56 ` Benoît Thébaudeau
2012-07-20 14:51 ` Stefan Herbrechtsmeier
2012-07-20 15:03 ` Benoît Thébaudeau
2012-07-20 15:15 ` Stefan Herbrechtsmeier
2012-07-20 15:35 ` Benoît Thébaudeau [this message]
2012-07-23 13:35 ` Stefan Herbrechtsmeier
2012-07-23 17:15 ` Benoît Thébaudeau
2012-07-24 13:02 ` Stefan Herbrechtsmeier
2012-07-29 0:48 ` Benoît Thébaudeau
2012-07-30 22:38 ` Marek Vasut
2012-07-31 1:06 ` Benoît Thébaudeau
2012-07-31 19:52 ` Stefan Herbrechtsmeier
2012-08-01 2:41 ` Marek Vasut
2012-08-03 23:02 ` Benoît Thébaudeau
2012-08-04 7:45 ` Marek Vasut
2012-08-08 23:14 ` Benoît Thébaudeau
2012-08-08 23:14 ` Marek Vasut
2012-07-31 20:01 ` Stefan Herbrechtsmeier
2012-07-27 14:07 ` Marek Vasut
2012-07-27 14:16 ` Benoît Thébaudeau
2012-07-27 14:30 ` Marek Vasut
2012-08-09 21:51 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH v3 3/8] " Benoît Thébaudeau
2012-08-09 22:32 ` Marek Vasut
2012-07-27 12:54 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH 2/5] " Marek Vasut
2012-07-27 13:59 ` Benoît Thébaudeau
2012-07-27 14:01 ` Marek Vasut
2012-07-27 14:13 ` Benoît Thébaudeau
2012-07-27 14:31 ` Marek Vasut
2012-07-29 0:58 ` Benoît Thébaudeau
2012-07-29 1:40 ` Marek Vasut
2012-07-29 14:14 ` Benoît Thébaudeau
2012-07-29 18:08 ` Marek Vasut
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1432817777.341004.1342798526523.JavaMail.root@advansee.com \
--to=benoit.thebaudeau@advansee.com \
--cc=u-boot@lists.denx.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox