public inbox for u-boot@lists.denx.de
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Scott Wood <scottwood@freescale.com>
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de
Subject: [U-Boot] [PATCH v2 7/8] mtd/nand/ubi: assortment of alignment fixes
Date: Thu, 9 Jul 2015 15:32:51 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1436473971.2658.130.camel@freescale.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1436428076.2953.14.camel@localhost.localdomain>

On Thu, 2015-07-09 at 09:47 +0200, Marcel Ziswiler wrote:
> Hi Scott
> 
> On Wed, 2015-07-08 at 18:25 -0500, Scott Wood wrote:
> > 
> > As per discussion on v1, this isn't enough to guarantee that the stop 
> > address 
> > will be aligned.  There needs to be a wrapper around memalign() that 
> > cache-
> > aligns the size as well.
> > 
> > -Scott
> 
> Sorry, that isn't quite clear to me yet. You're saying I would need to
> handle that in this patch?
> 
> Looking through the sources I actually found only one single usage of
> memalign() which explicitly takes care of this the way you propose:
> 
> drivers/usb/host/xhci-mem.c:  ptr = memalign(cacheline_size, ALIGN(size,
> cacheline_size));
> 
> I'm just wondering about the 107 other places in U-Boot where memalign()
> is already used the way I do in this patch.

I suppose there are enough existing ones that it won't hurt to add more -- 
it's still an improvement over the current situation -- but it'd be good to 
fix it properly before it gets forgotten.

> Wouldn't there need to be an infrastructure solution done to e.g.
> memalign() itself?

No, just a wrapper:

static inline void *malloc_cache_aligned(size_t size)
{
        return memalign(ARCH_DMA_MINALIGN, ALIGN(size, ARCH_DMA_MINALIGN));
}

  reply	other threads:[~2015-07-09 20:32 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-07-08 11:58 [U-Boot] [PATCH v2 0/8] assortment of fixes/enhancements Marcel Ziswiler
2015-07-08 11:58 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH v2 1/8] fs/fs.c: read up to EOF when len would read past EOF Marcel Ziswiler
2015-07-08 11:58 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH v2 2/8] net: asix: fix operation without eeprom Marcel Ziswiler
2015-07-08 12:46   ` Marek Vasut
2015-07-08 11:58 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH v2 3/8] generic-board: allow showing custom board info Marcel Ziswiler
2015-07-08 14:10   ` Simon Glass
2015-07-08 11:58 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH v2 4/8] logos: add Toradex logo Marcel Ziswiler
2015-07-08 11:58 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH v2 5/8] colibri_vf: remove spurious new line Marcel Ziswiler
2015-07-08 11:58 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH v2 6/8] image-fdt.c: store returned error value Marcel Ziswiler
2015-07-08 11:58 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH v2 7/8] mtd/nand/ubi: assortment of alignment fixes Marcel Ziswiler
2015-07-08 14:10   ` Simon Glass
2015-07-08 23:25   ` Scott Wood
2015-07-09  7:47     ` Marcel Ziswiler
2015-07-09 20:32       ` Scott Wood [this message]
2015-07-08 11:58 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH v2 8/8] tftp.c: fix CONFIG_TFTP_TSIZE for small files Marcel Ziswiler

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1436473971.2658.130.camel@freescale.com \
    --to=scottwood@freescale.com \
    --cc=u-boot@lists.denx.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox