[U-Boot] [PATCH 1/2] arm: socfpga: mmc: Enable calibration for drvsel and smpsel

[Chin Liang See <clsee@altera.com>]

Hi,

On Wed, 2015-08-19 at 09:26 +0200, ZY - pavel wrote:
> On Wed 2015-08-19 00:54:50, Chin Liang See wrote:
> > Enable SDMMC calibration to determine the best setting for
> > drvsel and smpsel. It will be triggered whenever there is
> > a change of card frequency and bus width. This is to ensure
> > reliable transmission between the controller and the card.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Chin Liang See <clsee@altera.com>
> > Cc: Dinh Nguyen <dinguyen@opensource.altera.com>
> > Cc: Pavel Machek <pavel@denx.de>
> > Cc: Marek Vasut <marex@denx.de>
> > Cc: Wolfgang Denk <wd@denx.de>
> > Cc: Stefan Roese <sr@denx.de>
> > Cc: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
> > ---
> >  drivers/mmc/socfpga_dw_mmc.c |  187 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
> >  1 files changed, 180 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/drivers/mmc/socfpga_dw_mmc.c b/drivers/mmc/socfpga_dw_mmc.c
> > index eb69aed..15e537c 100644
> > --- a/drivers/mmc/socfpga_dw_mmc.c
> > +++ b/drivers/mmc/socfpga_dw_mmc.c
> > @@ -11,25 +11,140 @@
> >  #include <asm/arch/dwmmc.h>
> >  #include <asm/arch/clock_manager.h>
> >  #include <asm/arch/system_manager.h>
> > +#include "mmc_private.h"
> >  
> >  static const struct socfpga_clock_manager *clock_manager_base =
> >  		(void *)SOCFPGA_CLKMGR_ADDRESS;
> >  static const struct socfpga_system_manager *system_manager_base =
> >  		(void *)SOCFPGA_SYSMGR_ADDRESS;
> >  
> > -static void socfpga_dwmci_clksel(struct dwmci_host *host)
> > +#define CAL_ROWS     7
> > +#define CAL_COLS     8
> > +
> > +/*
> > + * This function determines the largest rectangle filled with 1's and returns
> > + * the middle. This functon can be optimized, for example using the algorithm
> > + * from
> http://www.drdobbs.com/database/the-maximal-rectangle-problem/184410529
> 
> Actually, I'd like to see optimized version.  It has potential to be
> easier to read...
> 

Actually in this calibration, we should see a obvious rectangle.
We shouldn't have a fail in between the passes.


> > + * It currently takes less than 1ms, while creating the input data takes ~5ms
> > + * so there is not a real need to optimize it.
> > + */
> > +int find_calibration_point(unsigned char cal_results[CAL_ROWS][CAL_COLS],
> > +unsigned int sum, unsigned int * cal_row, unsigned int * cal_col)
> >  {
> > -	unsigned int drvsel;
> > -	unsigned int smplsel;
> > +	/* Structure containing a rectangle candidate */
> > +	typedef struct
> > +	{
> > +		unsigned char height;
> > +		unsigned char width;
> > +		unsigned short area;
> > +	} rect_cand_t;
> > +
> > +	/* Array with the rectangle candidates */
> > +	rect_cand_t rect_cands[CAL_ROWS * CAL_COLS];
> > +	unsigned char cr_rect_cand = 0;
> > +	unsigned char height, width, k;
> > +
> > +	/* No solution if all combinations fail */
> > +	if(sum == 0)
> > +		return 1;
> 
> Codingstyle: "if ("

Good catch, noted

> 
> > +	/*
> > +	 * Create list of all possible sub-rectangles, in descending area
> > +	 * order
> > +	 */
> > +	for(height = CAL_ROWS; height >= 1; height--) {
> > +		for(width = CAL_COLS; width >= 1 ; width--){
> 
> No space before ;.

Good catch, noted

> 
> 
> > +	/* Try to fit the rectangle candidates, in descending area order */
> > +	for(k = 0; k < CAL_ROWS * CAL_COLS; k++) {
> > +		unsigned char start_row, start_col;
> > +		unsigned rect_width = rect_cands[k].width;
> > +		unsigned rect_height = rect_cands[k].height;
> > +
> > +		/* Find the row and column where the candidate fits */
> > +		for (start_col = 0; start_col < (CAL_COLS - rect_width + 1);
> > +		     start_col++) {
> > +			for (start_row = 0; start_row < (CAL_ROWS -
> > +			     rect_height + 1); start_row++) {
> > +				unsigned ok = 1;
> > +				unsigned add_col, add_row;
> > +
> > +				/* Determine if the rectangle fits here */
> > +				for (add_col = 0; (add_col < rect_width) && ok;
> > +				     add_col++) {
> > +					for (add_row = 0; add_row < rect_height;
> > +					     add_row++) {
> > +						if (!cal_results
> > +						   [start_row+add_row][start_col
> > +						   + add_col]) {
> > +							ok = 0;
> > +							break;
> 
> Create separate functions to make it easier to read and less indented.
> 

Will do, thanks

Chin Liang