public inbox for u-boot@lists.denx.de
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Paul Kocialkowski <contact@paulk.fr>
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de
Subject: [U-Boot] [RFC PATCH v2] Makefile: search for GNU date
Date: Thu, 27 Aug 2015 16:23:07 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1440685387.2601.18.camel@collins> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <55DF160D.8050906@gmail.com>

Le jeudi 27 ao?t 2015 ? 15:52 +0200, Andreas Bie?mann a ?crit :
> On 08/27/2015 03:03 PM, Paul Kocialkowski wrote:
> > Le jeudi 27 ao?t 2015 ? 11:30 +0200, Andreas Bie?mann a ?crit :
> 
> 
> >> Changes in v2:
> >> * check for '-u' and '-d "@0"' switch rather than for the GNU variant
> >>
> >>  Makefile | 15 ++++++++++++---
> >>  1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/Makefile b/Makefile
> >> index b9b2375..b797e38 100644
> >> --- a/Makefile
> >> +++ b/Makefile
> >> @@ -346,6 +346,10 @@ PERL		= perl
> >>  PYTHON		= python
> >>  DTC		= dtc
> >>  CHECK		= sparse
> >> +DATE	       := $(foreach date,gdate date.gnu date, \
> >> +		    $(shell _date=`which $(date)`; \
> >> +		      $${_date} -u -d "@0" >/dev/null 2>&1; \
> >> +		      test $$? -eq 0 && echo $${_date}))
> > 
> > First, I don't understand why you need to call date with the full path:
> > if which can find it, then calling the binary without its full path
> > should do just as well, right?
> 
> You'r right.
> 
> > Then, correct me if I'm wrong, but calling test and using && is
> > overkill, you could simply do: $${_date} -u -d "@0" >/dev/null 2>&1 &&
> > echo $${_date}
> 
> Also true.
> 
> > So in the end, the whole line would look like:
> > 
> > DATE	       := $(foreach date,gdate date.gnu date, \
> > 		    $($${date} -u -d "@0" >/dev/null 2>&1 \
> > 		      && echo $${date}))
> > 
> > Let me know what you think (and please test it as well).
> 
> That should work. I wonder however why we don't include this snippet in
> the filechk_timestamp.h script directly. In fact the $(DATE) (a date
> that support -d '@0' switch) is just used there, so why clobber the
> Makefile with it?

I'm fine with both options, but your suggestion also makes it more
obvious why we're doing that check at all.

> ---8<---
> define filechk_timestamp.h
>  (if test -n "$${SOURCE_DATE_EPOCH}"; then \
>    date=""; \
>    for _date in gdate date.gnu date; do \
>    $${_date} -u -d "$${SOURCE_DATE}" >/dev/null 2>&1 && \
>       date="$${_date}"; \
>    done; \
>    if test -n "$${date}"; then \
>     SOURCE_DATE="@$${SOURCE_DATE_EPOCH}"; \
>     LC_ALL=C $${date} -u -d "$${SOURCE_DATE}" +'#define U_BOOT_DATE "%b
> %d %C%y"'; \
>     LC_ALL=C $${date} -u -d "$${SOURCE_DATE}" +'#define U_BOOT_TIME "%T"'; \
>     LC_ALL=C $${date} -u -d "$${SOURCE_DATE}" +'#define U_BOOT_TZ "%z"'; \
>    else \
>     return 42; \
>    fi; \
>   else \
>    LC_ALL=C date +'#define U_BOOT_DATE "%b %d %C%y"'; \
>    LC_ALL=C date +'#define U_BOOT_TIME "%T"'; \
>    LC_ALL=C date +'#define U_BOOT_TZ "%z"'; \
>   fi)
> endef
> --->8---
> 
> 
> >>  CHECKFLAGS     := -D__linux__ -Dlinux -D__STDC__ -Dunix -D__unix__ \
> >>  		  -Wbitwise -Wno-return-void -D__CHECK_ENDIAN__ $(CF)
> >> @@ -1281,9 +1285,9 @@ endef
> >>  define filechk_timestamp.h
> >>  	(if test -n "$${SOURCE_DATE_EPOCH}"; then \
> >>  		SOURCE_DATE="@$${SOURCE_DATE_EPOCH}"; \
> >> -		LC_ALL=C date -u -d "$${SOURCE_DATE}" +'#define U_BOOT_DATE "%b %d %C%y"'; \
> >> -		LC_ALL=C date -u -d "$${SOURCE_DATE}" +'#define U_BOOT_TIME "%T"'; \
> >> -		LC_ALL=C date -u -d "$${SOURCE_DATE}" +'#define U_BOOT_TZ "%z"'; \
> >> +		LC_ALL=C $(DATE) -u -d "$${SOURCE_DATE}" +'#define U_BOOT_DATE "%b %d %C%y"'; \
> >> +		LC_ALL=C $(DATE) -u -d "$${SOURCE_DATE}" +'#define U_BOOT_TIME "%T"'; \
> >> +		LC_ALL=C $(DATE) -u -d "$${SOURCE_DATE}" +'#define U_BOOT_TZ "%z"'; \
> >>  	else \
> >>  		LC_ALL=C date +'#define U_BOOT_DATE "%b %d %C%y"'; \
> >>  		LC_ALL=C date +'#define U_BOOT_TIME "%T"'; \
> >> @@ -1295,6 +1299,11 @@ $(version_h): include/config/uboot.release FORCE
> >>  	$(call filechk,version.h)
> >>  
> >>  $(timestamp_h): $(srctree)/Makefile FORCE
> >> +ifneq ($(strip $(SOURCE_DATE_EPOCH)),)
> >> +ifeq ($(strip $(DATE)),)
> >> +	$(error "Your gdate/date.gnu/date does not support the '-u' and '-d' switches like GNU date does!")
> >> +endif
> >> +endif
> >>  	$(call filechk,timestamp.h)
> >>  
> >>  # ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > 
> 

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 819 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/attachments/20150827/bc4b8558/attachment.sig>

  reply	other threads:[~2015-08-27 14:23 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 43+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-07-26 16:48 [U-Boot] [PATCH v2] Reproducible U-Boot build support, using SOURCE_DATE_EPOCH Paul Kocialkowski
2015-07-28 15:00 ` [U-Boot] [U-Boot, " Tom Rini
2015-07-31  2:54   ` Bin Meng
2015-07-31  5:25     ` Chris Packham
2015-07-31 10:04       ` [U-Boot] [PATCH] Makefile: Use correct timezone for U_BOOT_TZ Chris Packham
2015-07-31 12:14         ` Bin Meng
2015-07-31 17:05         ` Paul Kocialkowski
2015-08-01  9:40           ` Chris Packham
2015-08-01  9:43             ` [U-Boot] [PATCH v2] " Chris Packham
2015-08-10 10:49               ` Chris Packham
2015-07-31 10:19       ` [U-Boot] [Reproducible-builds] [U-Boot, v2] Reproducible U-Boot build support, using SOURCE_DATE_EPOCH Ximin Luo
2015-08-01 10:32         ` [U-Boot] [RFC PATCH] Makefile: Add SOURCE_DATE_TZ Chris Packham
2015-08-01 18:47           ` Paul Kocialkowski
2015-08-01 22:02             ` Ximin Luo
2015-08-01 22:04               ` Ximin Luo
2015-08-12 16:40           ` [U-Boot] [U-Boot,RFC] " Tom Rini
2015-08-13  5:57             ` Chris Packham
2015-08-25 10:08     ` [U-Boot] [U-Boot, v2] Reproducible U-Boot build support, using SOURCE_DATE_EPOCH Fabio Estevam
2015-08-25  8:49   ` Andreas Bießmann
2015-08-25  9:55     ` [U-Boot] [Reproducible-builds] " Vagrant Cascadian
2015-08-25 10:20       ` Andreas Bießmann
2015-08-25 12:12         ` Paul Kocialkowski
2015-08-25 11:20       ` [U-Boot] SOURCE_DATE_EPOCH must not be linux only... (was Re: [Reproducible-builds] [U-Boot, v2] Reproducible U-Boot build support, using SOURCE_DATE_EPOCH) Holger Levsen
2015-08-27  8:13     ` [U-Boot] [RFC PATCH] Makefile: search for GNU date Andreas Bießmann
2015-08-27  8:28       ` Marek Vasut
2015-08-27  9:01         ` Andreas Bießmann
2015-08-27 10:28           ` Marek Vasut
2015-08-27  8:32       ` Paul Kocialkowski
2015-08-27  8:56         ` Andreas Bießmann
2015-08-27  9:30       ` [U-Boot] [RFC PATCH v2] " Andreas Bießmann
2015-08-27 13:03         ` Paul Kocialkowski
2015-08-27 13:52           ` Andreas Bießmann
2015-08-27 14:23             ` Paul Kocialkowski [this message]
2015-08-28  8:29         ` [U-Boot] [PATCH v3] Makefile: fix SOURCE_DATE_EPOCH for *BSD host Andreas Bießmann
2015-08-28 21:04           ` [U-Boot] [U-Boot, " Tom Rini
2015-08-28 21:22             ` Holger Levsen
2015-09-01 17:03           ` [U-Boot] [PATCH " Paul Kocialkowski
2015-09-02  7:41             ` Andreas Bießmann
2015-09-24 16:05 ` [U-Boot] Reproducible U-Boot build support, using SOURCE_DATE_EPOCH Vagrant Cascadian
2015-09-28 17:42   ` Paul Kocialkowski
2015-09-30 15:50     ` [U-Boot] [Reproducible-builds] " Vagrant Cascadian
2015-10-02 10:19       ` Paul Kocialkowski
2015-09-28 18:59   ` [U-Boot] " Siarhei Siamashka

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1440685387.2601.18.camel@collins \
    --to=contact@paulk.fr \
    --cc=u-boot@lists.denx.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox