* [U-Boot] [PATCH v3 5/5] common: Enable fdt_support in SPL build @ 2015-09-10 5:02 Chin Liang See 2015-09-10 11:49 ` Marek Vasut 0 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread From: Chin Liang See @ 2015-09-10 5:02 UTC (permalink / raw) To: u-boot Enable more device tree function support such as fdt_getprop_u32_default_node in SPL. Signed-off-by: Chin Liang See <clsee@altera.com> Cc: Dinh Nguyen <dinguyen@opensource.altera.com> Cc: Dinh Nguyen <dinh.linux@gmail.com> Cc: Marek Vasut <marex@denx.de> Cc: Stefan Roese <sr@denx.de> Cc: Vikas Manocha <vikas.manocha@st.com> Cc: Jagannadh Teki <jteki@openedev.com> Cc: Pavel Machek <pavel@denx.de> --- common/Makefile | 4 ++-- 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/common/Makefile b/common/Makefile index 556fb07..9e059fe 100644 --- a/common/Makefile +++ b/common/Makefile @@ -97,7 +97,7 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_CMD_EXT4) += cmd_ext4.o obj-$(CONFIG_CMD_EXT2) += cmd_ext2.o obj-$(CONFIG_CMD_FAT) += cmd_fat.o obj-$(CONFIG_CMD_FDC) += cmd_fdc.o -obj-$(CONFIG_OF_LIBFDT) += cmd_fdt.o fdt_support.o +obj-$(CONFIG_OF_LIBFDT) += cmd_fdt.o obj-$(CONFIG_CMD_FITUPD) += cmd_fitupd.o obj-$(CONFIG_CMD_FLASH) += cmd_flash.o ifdef CONFIG_FPGA @@ -265,7 +265,7 @@ obj-y += malloc_simple.o endif obj-y += image.o obj-$(CONFIG_ANDROID_BOOT_IMAGE) += image-android.o -obj-$(CONFIG_OF_LIBFDT) += image-fdt.o +obj-$(CONFIG_OF_LIBFDT) += image-fdt.o fdt_support.o obj-$(CONFIG_FIT) += image-fit.o obj-$(CONFIG_FIT_SIGNATURE) += image-sig.o obj-$(CONFIG_IO_TRACE) += iotrace.o -- 1.7.7.4 ^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* [U-Boot] [PATCH v3 5/5] common: Enable fdt_support in SPL build 2015-09-10 5:02 [U-Boot] [PATCH v3 5/5] common: Enable fdt_support in SPL build Chin Liang See @ 2015-09-10 11:49 ` Marek Vasut 2015-09-11 0:14 ` Simon Glass 0 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread From: Marek Vasut @ 2015-09-10 11:49 UTC (permalink / raw) To: u-boot On Thursday, September 10, 2015 at 07:02:16 AM, Chin Liang See wrote: > Enable more device tree function support such as > fdt_getprop_u32_default_node in SPL. > > Signed-off-by: Chin Liang See <clsee@altera.com> > Cc: Dinh Nguyen <dinguyen@opensource.altera.com> > Cc: Dinh Nguyen <dinh.linux@gmail.com> > Cc: Marek Vasut <marex@denx.de> > Cc: Stefan Roese <sr@denx.de> > Cc: Vikas Manocha <vikas.manocha@st.com> > Cc: Jagannadh Teki <jteki@openedev.com> > Cc: Pavel Machek <pavel@denx.de> +CC Simon, I'm worried this might blow the size of all SPLs , which is not the thing we'd like to see. > --- > common/Makefile | 4 ++-- > 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/common/Makefile b/common/Makefile > index 556fb07..9e059fe 100644 > --- a/common/Makefile > +++ b/common/Makefile > @@ -97,7 +97,7 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_CMD_EXT4) += cmd_ext4.o > obj-$(CONFIG_CMD_EXT2) += cmd_ext2.o > obj-$(CONFIG_CMD_FAT) += cmd_fat.o > obj-$(CONFIG_CMD_FDC) += cmd_fdc.o > -obj-$(CONFIG_OF_LIBFDT) += cmd_fdt.o fdt_support.o > +obj-$(CONFIG_OF_LIBFDT) += cmd_fdt.o > obj-$(CONFIG_CMD_FITUPD) += cmd_fitupd.o > obj-$(CONFIG_CMD_FLASH) += cmd_flash.o > ifdef CONFIG_FPGA > @@ -265,7 +265,7 @@ obj-y += malloc_simple.o > endif > obj-y += image.o > obj-$(CONFIG_ANDROID_BOOT_IMAGE) += image-android.o > -obj-$(CONFIG_OF_LIBFDT) += image-fdt.o > +obj-$(CONFIG_OF_LIBFDT) += image-fdt.o fdt_support.o > obj-$(CONFIG_FIT) += image-fit.o > obj-$(CONFIG_FIT_SIGNATURE) += image-sig.o > obj-$(CONFIG_IO_TRACE) += iotrace.o > -- > 1.7.7.4 Best regards, Marek Vasut ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* [U-Boot] [PATCH v3 5/5] common: Enable fdt_support in SPL build 2015-09-10 11:49 ` Marek Vasut @ 2015-09-11 0:14 ` Simon Glass 2015-09-11 0:45 ` Marek Vasut 0 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread From: Simon Glass @ 2015-09-11 0:14 UTC (permalink / raw) To: u-boot Hi, On 10 September 2015 at 04:49, Marek Vasut <marex@denx.de> wrote: > On Thursday, September 10, 2015 at 07:02:16 AM, Chin Liang See wrote: >> Enable more device tree function support such as >> fdt_getprop_u32_default_node in SPL. >> >> Signed-off-by: Chin Liang See <clsee@altera.com> >> Cc: Dinh Nguyen <dinguyen@opensource.altera.com> >> Cc: Dinh Nguyen <dinh.linux@gmail.com> >> Cc: Marek Vasut <marex@denx.de> >> Cc: Stefan Roese <sr@denx.de> >> Cc: Vikas Manocha <vikas.manocha@st.com> >> Cc: Jagannadh Teki <jteki@openedev.com> >> Cc: Pavel Machek <pavel@denx.de> > > +CC Simon, I'm worried this might blow the size of all SPLs , which is not > the thing we'd like to see. > >> --- >> common/Makefile | 4 ++-- >> 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) >> >> diff --git a/common/Makefile b/common/Makefile >> index 556fb07..9e059fe 100644 >> --- a/common/Makefile >> +++ b/common/Makefile >> @@ -97,7 +97,7 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_CMD_EXT4) += cmd_ext4.o >> obj-$(CONFIG_CMD_EXT2) += cmd_ext2.o >> obj-$(CONFIG_CMD_FAT) += cmd_fat.o >> obj-$(CONFIG_CMD_FDC) += cmd_fdc.o >> -obj-$(CONFIG_OF_LIBFDT) += cmd_fdt.o fdt_support.o >> +obj-$(CONFIG_OF_LIBFDT) += cmd_fdt.o >> obj-$(CONFIG_CMD_FITUPD) += cmd_fitupd.o >> obj-$(CONFIG_CMD_FLASH) += cmd_flash.o >> ifdef CONFIG_FPGA >> @@ -265,7 +265,7 @@ obj-y += malloc_simple.o >> endif >> obj-y += image.o >> obj-$(CONFIG_ANDROID_BOOT_IMAGE) += image-android.o >> -obj-$(CONFIG_OF_LIBFDT) += image-fdt.o >> +obj-$(CONFIG_OF_LIBFDT) += image-fdt.o fdt_support.o >> obj-$(CONFIG_FIT) += image-fit.o >> obj-$(CONFIG_FIT_SIGNATURE) += image-sig.o >> obj-$(CONFIG_IO_TRACE) += iotrace.o >> -- >> 1.7.7.4 It might need a bit of work - here's a buildman run: 02: common: Enable fdt_support in SPL build powerpc: + P1022DS_36BIT_NAND T1024RDB_SPIFLASH P1010RDB-PA_SPIFLASH P1021RDB-PC_36BIT_NAND T2080QDS_SPIFLASH P1025RDB_SDCARD P2020RDB-PC_36BIT_SPIFLASH T1042RDB_PI_SPIFLASH P1010RDB-PA_36BIT_NAND P1010RDB-PB_SDCARD P2020RDB-PC_SPIFLASH P1020MBG-PC_36BIT_SDCARD P1024RDB_SPIFLASH T1042D4RDB_NAND T4240RDB_SDCARD P1010RDB-PB_36BIT_NAND P1022DS_36BIT_SDCARD T1024QDS_NAND P1021RDB-PC_SPIFLASH T1024RDB_NAND T1023RDB_SDCARD P1010RDB-PB_36BIT_SDCARD P1022DS_NAND P1020RDB-PC_36BIT_NAND P1020RDB-PC_SDCARD T1042RDB_PI_NAND P1020RDB-PD_SPIFLASH T2080RDB_NAND P1022DS_SDCARD P1020RDB-PC_36BIT_SPIFLASH T1042RDB_PI_SDCARD T2081QDS_NAND T4160QDS_SDCARD P1010RDB-PB_SPIFLASH T2080QDS_SDCARD P1020MBG-PC_SDCARD P1020RDB-PC_SPIFLASH T4240QDS_SDCARD P2020RDB-PC_36BIT_SDCARD T1040RDB_SDCARD P1021RDB-PC_SDCARD B4860QDS_NAND T2080RDB_SDCARD P1020RDB-PC_36BIT_SDCARD T1040D4RDB_SDCARD T1040D4RDB_SPIFLASH P1020RDB-PC_NAND T2080QDS_NAND T1023RDB_NAND P1020RDB-PD_NAND T1040D4RDB_NAND P1010RDB-PA_NAND T1040RDB_SPIFLASH P2020RDB-PC_SDCARD T2081QDS_SDCARD P1010RDB-PA_36BIT_SDCARD P1024RDB_NAND P1024RDB_SDCARD T4240QDS_NAND C29XPCIE_NAND B4420QDS_NAND P1021RDB-PC_36BIT_SPIFLASH P1025RDB_SPIFLASH T2081QDS_SPIFLASH T1040RDB_NAND P1010RDB-PA_SDCARD P1010RDB-PB_NAND T1024QDS_SDCARD T1024QDS_SPIFLASH P1021RDB-PC_NAND T1042D4RDB_SPIFLASH P1020UTM-PC_36BIT_SDCARD T4160QDS_NAND T2080RDB_SPIFLASH P1022DS_SPIFLASH T1042D4RDB_SDCARD P1021RDB-PC_36BIT_SDCARD P1020RDB-PD_SDCARD P1022DS_36BIT_SPIFLASH T1024RDB_SDCARD P1020UTM-PC_SDCARD P2020RDB-PC_36BIT_NAND P2020RDB-PC_NAND T1023RDB_SPIFLASH P1010RDB-PB_36BIT_SPIFLASH P1025RDB_NAND P1010RDB-PA_36BIT_SPIFLASH blackfin: (for 34/35 boards) all +16.0 rodata +16.0 x86: (for 9/9 boards) bss -14.2 rodata +14.2 aarch64: (for 13/13 boards) all +17.2 rodata +17.2 spl/u-boot-spl:all +151.4 spl/u-boot-spl:rodata +151.4 avr32: (for 4/4 boards) all +16.0 rodata +16.0 sandbox: (for 1/1 boards) all +16.0 rodata +16.0 m68k: (for 48/48 boards) all +11.7 text +11.7 powerpc: (for 412/416 boards) all +3.6 data +1.6 rodata +2.0 spl/u-boot-spl:all +5.8 spl/u-boot-spl:rodata +5.0 spl/u-boot-spl:text +0.8 sparc: (for 5/5 boards) all +32.0 data +16.0 text +16.0 sh: (for 21/22 boards) all +16.0 rodata +16.0 nios2: (for 1/1 boards) all +16.0 data +16.0 mips: (for 24/24 boards) all +20.0 bss +4.0 rodata +16.0 arm: (for 531/531 boards) all +17.7 bss +0.3 rodata +17.4 spl/u-boot-spl:all +69.0 spl/u-boot-spl:rodata +69.0 nds32: (for 1/1 boards) all +16.0 rodata +16.0 So there are some code size changes (which may not be a big deal at 15 -60 bytes) but it breaks lots of powerpc boards. Can we instead add CONFIG_SPL_OF_LIBFDT? Regards, Simon ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* [U-Boot] [PATCH v3 5/5] common: Enable fdt_support in SPL build 2015-09-11 0:14 ` Simon Glass @ 2015-09-11 0:45 ` Marek Vasut [not found] ` <0016CF5815A1B142902817051AF62EB305F787C6@PG-ITEXCH02.altera.priv.altera.com> 0 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread From: Marek Vasut @ 2015-09-11 0:45 UTC (permalink / raw) To: u-boot On Friday, September 11, 2015 at 02:14:17 AM, Simon Glass wrote: > Hi, > > On 10 September 2015 at 04:49, Marek Vasut <marex@denx.de> wrote: > > On Thursday, September 10, 2015 at 07:02:16 AM, Chin Liang See wrote: > >> Enable more device tree function support such as > >> fdt_getprop_u32_default_node in SPL. > >> > >> Signed-off-by: Chin Liang See <clsee@altera.com> > >> Cc: Dinh Nguyen <dinguyen@opensource.altera.com> > >> Cc: Dinh Nguyen <dinh.linux@gmail.com> > >> Cc: Marek Vasut <marex@denx.de> > >> Cc: Stefan Roese <sr@denx.de> > >> Cc: Vikas Manocha <vikas.manocha@st.com> > >> Cc: Jagannadh Teki <jteki@openedev.com> > >> Cc: Pavel Machek <pavel@denx.de> > > > > +CC Simon, I'm worried this might blow the size of all SPLs , which is > > not the thing we'd like to see. > > > >> --- > >> > >> common/Makefile | 4 ++-- > >> 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > >> > >> diff --git a/common/Makefile b/common/Makefile > >> index 556fb07..9e059fe 100644 > >> --- a/common/Makefile > >> +++ b/common/Makefile > >> @@ -97,7 +97,7 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_CMD_EXT4) += cmd_ext4.o > >> > >> obj-$(CONFIG_CMD_EXT2) += cmd_ext2.o > >> obj-$(CONFIG_CMD_FAT) += cmd_fat.o > >> obj-$(CONFIG_CMD_FDC) += cmd_fdc.o > >> > >> -obj-$(CONFIG_OF_LIBFDT) += cmd_fdt.o fdt_support.o > >> +obj-$(CONFIG_OF_LIBFDT) += cmd_fdt.o > >> > >> obj-$(CONFIG_CMD_FITUPD) += cmd_fitupd.o > >> obj-$(CONFIG_CMD_FLASH) += cmd_flash.o > >> ifdef CONFIG_FPGA > >> > >> @@ -265,7 +265,7 @@ obj-y += malloc_simple.o > >> > >> endif > >> obj-y += image.o > >> obj-$(CONFIG_ANDROID_BOOT_IMAGE) += image-android.o > >> > >> -obj-$(CONFIG_OF_LIBFDT) += image-fdt.o > >> +obj-$(CONFIG_OF_LIBFDT) += image-fdt.o fdt_support.o > >> > >> obj-$(CONFIG_FIT) += image-fit.o > >> obj-$(CONFIG_FIT_SIGNATURE) += image-sig.o > >> obj-$(CONFIG_IO_TRACE) += iotrace.o > >> > >> -- > >> 1.7.7.4 > > It might need a bit of work - here's a buildman run: > > 02: common: Enable fdt_support in SPL build > powerpc: + P1022DS_36BIT_NAND T1024RDB_SPIFLASH > P1010RDB-PA_SPIFLASH P1021RDB-PC_36BIT_NAND T2080QDS_SPIFLASH > P1025RDB_SDCARD P2020RDB-PC_36BIT_SPIFLASH T1042RDB_PI_SPIFLASH > P1010RDB-PA_36BIT_NAND P1010RDB-PB_SDCARD P2020RDB-PC_SPIFLASH > P1020MBG-PC_36BIT_SDCARD P1024RDB_SPIFLASH T1042D4RDB_NAND > T4240RDB_SDCARD P1010RDB-PB_36BIT_NAND P1022DS_36BIT_SDCARD > T1024QDS_NAND P1021RDB-PC_SPIFLASH T1024RDB_NAND T1023RDB_SDCARD > P1010RDB-PB_36BIT_SDCARD P1022DS_NAND P1020RDB-PC_36BIT_NAND > P1020RDB-PC_SDCARD T1042RDB_PI_NAND P1020RDB-PD_SPIFLASH T2080RDB_NAND > P1022DS_SDCARD P1020RDB-PC_36BIT_SPIFLASH T1042RDB_PI_SDCARD > T2081QDS_NAND T4160QDS_SDCARD P1010RDB-PB_SPIFLASH T2080QDS_SDCARD > P1020MBG-PC_SDCARD P1020RDB-PC_SPIFLASH T4240QDS_SDCARD > P2020RDB-PC_36BIT_SDCARD T1040RDB_SDCARD P1021RDB-PC_SDCARD > B4860QDS_NAND T2080RDB_SDCARD P1020RDB-PC_36BIT_SDCARD > T1040D4RDB_SDCARD T1040D4RDB_SPIFLASH P1020RDB-PC_NAND T2080QDS_NAND > T1023RDB_NAND P1020RDB-PD_NAND T1040D4RDB_NAND P1010RDB-PA_NAND > T1040RDB_SPIFLASH P2020RDB-PC_SDCARD T2081QDS_SDCARD > P1010RDB-PA_36BIT_SDCARD P1024RDB_NAND P1024RDB_SDCARD T4240QDS_NAND > C29XPCIE_NAND B4420QDS_NAND P1021RDB-PC_36BIT_SPIFLASH > P1025RDB_SPIFLASH T2081QDS_SPIFLASH T1040RDB_NAND P1010RDB-PA_SDCARD > P1010RDB-PB_NAND T1024QDS_SDCARD T1024QDS_SPIFLASH P1021RDB-PC_NAND > T1042D4RDB_SPIFLASH P1020UTM-PC_36BIT_SDCARD T4160QDS_NAND > T2080RDB_SPIFLASH P1022DS_SPIFLASH T1042D4RDB_SDCARD > P1021RDB-PC_36BIT_SDCARD P1020RDB-PD_SDCARD P1022DS_36BIT_SPIFLASH > T1024RDB_SDCARD P1020UTM-PC_SDCARD P2020RDB-PC_36BIT_NAND > P2020RDB-PC_NAND T1023RDB_SPIFLASH P1010RDB-PB_36BIT_SPIFLASH > P1025RDB_NAND P1010RDB-PA_36BIT_SPIFLASH > blackfin: (for 34/35 boards) all +16.0 rodata +16.0 > x86: (for 9/9 boards) bss -14.2 rodata +14.2 > aarch64: (for 13/13 boards) all +17.2 rodata +17.2 > spl/u-boot-spl:all +151.4 spl/u-boot-spl:rodata +151.4 > avr32: (for 4/4 boards) all +16.0 rodata +16.0 > sandbox: (for 1/1 boards) all +16.0 rodata +16.0 > m68k: (for 48/48 boards) all +11.7 text +11.7 > powerpc: (for 412/416 boards) all +3.6 data +1.6 rodata +2.0 > spl/u-boot-spl:all +5.8 spl/u-boot-spl:rodata +5.0 > spl/u-boot-spl:text +0.8 > sparc: (for 5/5 boards) all +32.0 data +16.0 text +16.0 > sh: (for 21/22 boards) all +16.0 rodata +16.0 > nios2: (for 1/1 boards) all +16.0 data +16.0 > mips: (for 24/24 boards) all +20.0 bss +4.0 rodata +16.0 > arm: (for 531/531 boards) all +17.7 bss +0.3 rodata +17.4 > spl/u-boot-spl:all +69.0 spl/u-boot-spl:rodata +69.0 > nds32: (for 1/1 boards) all +16.0 rodata +16.0 Just what I was worried about. > So there are some code size changes (which may not be a big deal at 15 > -60 bytes) but it breaks lots of powerpc boards. > > Can we instead add CONFIG_SPL_OF_LIBFDT? What would be the difference between having CONFIG_OF_LIBFDT enabled in SPL (which is the case now) and having CONFIG_SPL_OF_LIBFDT enabled ? The naming seems a bit difficult to comprehend to me. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
[parent not found: <0016CF5815A1B142902817051AF62EB305F787C6@PG-ITEXCH02.altera.priv.altera.com>]
* [U-Boot] [PATCH v3 5/5] common: Enable fdt_support in SPL build [not found] ` <0016CF5815A1B142902817051AF62EB305F787C6@PG-ITEXCH02.altera.priv.altera.com> @ 2015-09-23 3:10 ` Chin Liang See 2015-09-23 15:38 ` Simon Glass 0 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread From: Chin Liang See @ 2015-09-23 3:10 UTC (permalink / raw) To: u-boot Hi, > From: marex at denx.de > Sent: Friday, September 11, 2015 8:45 AM > To: Simon Glass > Cc: Chin Liang See; ZY - u-boot; Dinh Nguyen; Dinh Nguyen; ZY - sr; Vikas Manocha; Jagannadh Teki; ZY - pavel > Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 5/5] common: Enable fdt_support in SPL build > > On Friday, September 11, 2015 at 02:14:17 AM, Simon Glass wrote: > > Hi, > > > > On 10 September 2015 at 04:49, Marek Vasut <marex@denx.de> wrote: > > > On Thursday, September 10, 2015 at 07:02:16 AM, Chin Liang See wrote: > > >> Enable more device tree function support such as > > >> fdt_getprop_u32_default_node in SPL. > > >> > > >> Signed-off-by: Chin Liang See <clsee@altera.com> > > >> Cc: Dinh Nguyen <dinguyen@opensource.altera.com> > > >> Cc: Dinh Nguyen <dinh.linux@gmail.com> > > >> Cc: Marek Vasut <marex@denx.de> > > >> Cc: Stefan Roese <sr@denx.de> > > >> Cc: Vikas Manocha <vikas.manocha@st.com> > > >> Cc: Jagannadh Teki <jteki@openedev.com> > > >> Cc: Pavel Machek <pavel@denx.de> > > > > > > +CC Simon, I'm worried this might blow the size of all SPLs , which is > > > not the thing we'd like to see. > > > > > >> --- > > >> > > >> common/Makefile | 4 ++-- > > >> 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > >> > > >> diff --git a/common/Makefile b/common/Makefile > > >> index 556fb07..9e059fe 100644 > > >> --- a/common/Makefile > > >> +++ b/common/Makefile > > >> @@ -97,7 +97,7 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_CMD_EXT4) += cmd_ext4.o > > >> > > >> obj-$(CONFIG_CMD_EXT2) += cmd_ext2.o > > >> obj-$(CONFIG_CMD_FAT) += cmd_fat.o > > >> obj-$(CONFIG_CMD_FDC) += cmd_fdc.o > > >> > > >> -obj-$(CONFIG_OF_LIBFDT) += cmd_fdt.o fdt_support.o > > >> +obj-$(CONFIG_OF_LIBFDT) += cmd_fdt.o > > >> > > >> obj-$(CONFIG_CMD_FITUPD) += cmd_fitupd.o > > >> obj-$(CONFIG_CMD_FLASH) += cmd_flash.o > > >> ifdef CONFIG_FPGA > > >> > > >> @@ -265,7 +265,7 @@ obj-y += malloc_simple.o > > >> > > >> endif > > >> obj-y += image.o > > >> obj-$(CONFIG_ANDROID_BOOT_IMAGE) += image-android.o > > >> > > >> -obj-$(CONFIG_OF_LIBFDT) += image-fdt.o > > >> +obj-$(CONFIG_OF_LIBFDT) += image-fdt.o fdt_support.o > > >> > > >> obj-$(CONFIG_FIT) += image-fit.o > > >> obj-$(CONFIG_FIT_SIGNATURE) += image-sig.o > > >> obj-$(CONFIG_IO_TRACE) += iotrace.o > > >> > > >> -- > > >> 1.7.7.4 > > > > It might need a bit of work - here's a buildman run: > > > > 02: common: Enable fdt_support in SPL build > > powerpc: + P1022DS_36BIT_NAND T1024RDB_SPIFLASH > > P1010RDB-PA_SPIFLASH P1021RDB-PC_36BIT_NAND T2080QDS_SPIFLASH > > P1025RDB_SDCARD P2020RDB-PC_36BIT_SPIFLASH T1042RDB_PI_SPIFLASH > > P1010RDB-PA_36BIT_NAND P1010RDB-PB_SDCARD P2020RDB-PC_SPIFLASH > > P1020MBG-PC_36BIT_SDCARD P1024RDB_SPIFLASH T1042D4RDB_NAND > > T4240RDB_SDCARD P1010RDB-PB_36BIT_NAND P1022DS_36BIT_SDCARD > > T1024QDS_NAND P1021RDB-PC_SPIFLASH T1024RDB_NAND T1023RDB_SDCARD > > P1010RDB-PB_36BIT_SDCARD P1022DS_NAND P1020RDB-PC_36BIT_NAND > > P1020RDB-PC_SDCARD T1042RDB_PI_NAND P1020RDB-PD_SPIFLASH T2080RDB_NAND > > P1022DS_SDCARD P1020RDB-PC_36BIT_SPIFLASH T1042RDB_PI_SDCARD > > T2081QDS_NAND T4160QDS_SDCARD P1010RDB-PB_SPIFLASH T2080QDS_SDCARD > > P1020MBG-PC_SDCARD P1020RDB-PC_SPIFLASH T4240QDS_SDCARD > > P2020RDB-PC_36BIT_SDCARD T1040RDB_SDCARD P1021RDB-PC_SDCARD > > B4860QDS_NAND T2080RDB_SDCARD P1020RDB-PC_36BIT_SDCARD > > T1040D4RDB_SDCARD T1040D4RDB_SPIFLASH P1020RDB-PC_NAND T2080QDS_NAND > > T1023RDB_NAND P1020RDB-PD_NAND T1040D4RDB_NAND P1010RDB-PA_NAND > > T1040RDB_SPIFLASH P2020RDB-PC_SDCARD T2081QDS_SDCARD > > P1010RDB-PA_36BIT_SDCARD P1024RDB_NAND P1024RDB_SDCARD T4240QDS_NAND > > C29XPCIE_NAND B4420QDS_NAND P1021RDB-PC_36BIT_SPIFLASH > > P1025RDB_SPIFLASH T2081QDS_SPIFLASH T1040RDB_NAND P1010RDB-PA_SDCARD > > P1010RDB-PB_NAND T1024QDS_SDCARD T1024QDS_SPIFLASH P1021RDB-PC_NAND > > T1042D4RDB_SPIFLASH P1020UTM-PC_36BIT_SDCARD T4160QDS_NAND > > T2080RDB_SPIFLASH P1022DS_SPIFLASH T1042D4RDB_SDCARD > > P1021RDB-PC_36BIT_SDCARD P1020RDB-PD_SDCARD P1022DS_36BIT_SPIFLASH > > T1024RDB_SDCARD P1020UTM-PC_SDCARD P2020RDB-PC_36BIT_NAND > > P2020RDB-PC_NAND T1023RDB_SPIFLASH P1010RDB-PB_36BIT_SPIFLASH > > P1025RDB_NAND P1010RDB-PA_36BIT_SPIFLASH > > blackfin: (for 34/35 boards) all +16.0 rodata +16.0 > > x86: (for 9/9 boards) bss -14.2 rodata +14.2 > > aarch64: (for 13/13 boards) all +17.2 rodata +17.2 > > spl/u-boot-spl:all +151.4 spl/u-boot-spl:rodata +151.4 > > avr32: (for 4/4 boards) all +16.0 rodata +16.0 > > sandbox: (for 1/1 boards) all +16.0 rodata +16.0 > > m68k: (for 48/48 boards) all +11.7 text +11.7 > > powerpc: (for 412/416 boards) all +3.6 data +1.6 rodata +2.0 > > spl/u-boot-spl:all +5.8 spl/u-boot-spl:rodata +5.0 > > spl/u-boot-spl:text +0.8 > > sparc: (for 5/5 boards) all +32.0 data +16.0 text +16.0 > > sh: (for 21/22 boards) all +16.0 rodata +16.0 > > nios2: (for 1/1 boards) all +16.0 data +16.0 > > mips: (for 24/24 boards) all +20.0 bss +4.0 rodata +16.0 > > arm: (for 531/531 boards) all +17.7 bss +0.3 rodata +17.4 > > spl/u-boot-spl:all +69.0 spl/u-boot-spl:rodata +69.0 > > nds32: (for 1/1 boards) all +16.0 rodata +16.0 > > Just what I was worried about. > > > So there are some code size changes (which may not be a big deal at 15 > > -60 bytes) but it breaks lots of powerpc boards. > > > > Can we instead add CONFIG_SPL_OF_LIBFDT? > > What would be the difference between having CONFIG_OF_LIBFDT enabled in > SPL (which is the case now) and having CONFIG_SPL_OF_LIBFDT enabled ? > The naming seems a bit difficult to comprehend to me. Sorry for late reply as fully tight up with something. To minimize the impact, we can create fdtdec_get_uint32 in lib/fdtdec_common.c. Then we can drop this patch. Any thought? Thanks Chin Liang ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* [U-Boot] [PATCH v3 5/5] common: Enable fdt_support in SPL build 2015-09-23 3:10 ` Chin Liang See @ 2015-09-23 15:38 ` Simon Glass 2015-09-30 0:32 ` Chin Liang See 0 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread From: Simon Glass @ 2015-09-23 15:38 UTC (permalink / raw) To: u-boot Hi, On 22 September 2015 at 21:10, Chin Liang See <clsee@altera.com> wrote: > > Hi, > > > From: marex at denx.de > > Sent: Friday, September 11, 2015 8:45 AM > > To: Simon Glass > > Cc: Chin Liang See; ZY - u-boot; Dinh Nguyen; Dinh Nguyen; ZY - sr; Vikas Manocha; Jagannadh Teki; ZY - pavel > > Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 5/5] common: Enable fdt_support in SPL build > > > > On Friday, September 11, 2015 at 02:14:17 AM, Simon Glass wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > > > On 10 September 2015 at 04:49, Marek Vasut <marex@denx.de> wrote: > > > > On Thursday, September 10, 2015 at 07:02:16 AM, Chin Liang See wrote: > > > >> Enable more device tree function support such as > > > >> fdt_getprop_u32_default_node in SPL. > > > >> > > > >> Signed-off-by: Chin Liang See <clsee@altera.com> > > > >> Cc: Dinh Nguyen <dinguyen@opensource.altera.com> > > > >> Cc: Dinh Nguyen <dinh.linux@gmail.com> > > > >> Cc: Marek Vasut <marex@denx.de> > > > >> Cc: Stefan Roese <sr@denx.de> > > > >> Cc: Vikas Manocha <vikas.manocha@st.com> > > > >> Cc: Jagannadh Teki <jteki@openedev.com> > > > >> Cc: Pavel Machek <pavel@denx.de> > > > > > > > > +CC Simon, I'm worried this might blow the size of all SPLs , which is > > > > not the thing we'd like to see. > > > > > > > >> --- > > > >> > > > >> common/Makefile | 4 ++-- > > > >> 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > > >> > > > >> diff --git a/common/Makefile b/common/Makefile > > > >> index 556fb07..9e059fe 100644 > > > >> --- a/common/Makefile > > > >> +++ b/common/Makefile > > > >> @@ -97,7 +97,7 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_CMD_EXT4) += cmd_ext4.o > > > >> > > > >> obj-$(CONFIG_CMD_EXT2) += cmd_ext2.o > > > >> obj-$(CONFIG_CMD_FAT) += cmd_fat.o > > > >> obj-$(CONFIG_CMD_FDC) += cmd_fdc.o > > > >> > > > >> -obj-$(CONFIG_OF_LIBFDT) += cmd_fdt.o fdt_support.o > > > >> +obj-$(CONFIG_OF_LIBFDT) += cmd_fdt.o > > > >> > > > >> obj-$(CONFIG_CMD_FITUPD) += cmd_fitupd.o > > > >> obj-$(CONFIG_CMD_FLASH) += cmd_flash.o > > > >> ifdef CONFIG_FPGA > > > >> > > > >> @@ -265,7 +265,7 @@ obj-y += malloc_simple.o > > > >> > > > >> endif > > > >> obj-y += image.o > > > >> obj-$(CONFIG_ANDROID_BOOT_IMAGE) += image-android.o > > > >> > > > >> -obj-$(CONFIG_OF_LIBFDT) += image-fdt.o > > > >> +obj-$(CONFIG_OF_LIBFDT) += image-fdt.o fdt_support.o > > > >> > > > >> obj-$(CONFIG_FIT) += image-fit.o > > > >> obj-$(CONFIG_FIT_SIGNATURE) += image-sig.o > > > >> obj-$(CONFIG_IO_TRACE) += iotrace.o > > > >> > > > >> -- > > > >> 1.7.7.4 > > > > > > It might need a bit of work - here's a buildman run: > > > > > > 02: common: Enable fdt_support in SPL build > > > powerpc: + P1022DS_36BIT_NAND T1024RDB_SPIFLASH > > > P1010RDB-PA_SPIFLASH P1021RDB-PC_36BIT_NAND T2080QDS_SPIFLASH > > > P1025RDB_SDCARD P2020RDB-PC_36BIT_SPIFLASH T1042RDB_PI_SPIFLASH > > > P1010RDB-PA_36BIT_NAND P1010RDB-PB_SDCARD P2020RDB-PC_SPIFLASH > > > P1020MBG-PC_36BIT_SDCARD P1024RDB_SPIFLASH T1042D4RDB_NAND > > > T4240RDB_SDCARD P1010RDB-PB_36BIT_NAND P1022DS_36BIT_SDCARD > > > T1024QDS_NAND P1021RDB-PC_SPIFLASH T1024RDB_NAND T1023RDB_SDCARD > > > P1010RDB-PB_36BIT_SDCARD P1022DS_NAND P1020RDB-PC_36BIT_NAND > > > P1020RDB-PC_SDCARD T1042RDB_PI_NAND P1020RDB-PD_SPIFLASH T2080RDB_NAND > > > P1022DS_SDCARD P1020RDB-PC_36BIT_SPIFLASH T1042RDB_PI_SDCARD > > > T2081QDS_NAND T4160QDS_SDCARD P1010RDB-PB_SPIFLASH T2080QDS_SDCARD > > > P1020MBG-PC_SDCARD P1020RDB-PC_SPIFLASH T4240QDS_SDCARD > > > P2020RDB-PC_36BIT_SDCARD T1040RDB_SDCARD P1021RDB-PC_SDCARD > > > B4860QDS_NAND T2080RDB_SDCARD P1020RDB-PC_36BIT_SDCARD > > > T1040D4RDB_SDCARD T1040D4RDB_SPIFLASH P1020RDB-PC_NAND T2080QDS_NAND > > > T1023RDB_NAND P1020RDB-PD_NAND T1040D4RDB_NAND P1010RDB-PA_NAND > > > T1040RDB_SPIFLASH P2020RDB-PC_SDCARD T2081QDS_SDCARD > > > P1010RDB-PA_36BIT_SDCARD P1024RDB_NAND P1024RDB_SDCARD T4240QDS_NAND > > > C29XPCIE_NAND B4420QDS_NAND P1021RDB-PC_36BIT_SPIFLASH > > > P1025RDB_SPIFLASH T2081QDS_SPIFLASH T1040RDB_NAND P1010RDB-PA_SDCARD > > > P1010RDB-PB_NAND T1024QDS_SDCARD T1024QDS_SPIFLASH P1021RDB-PC_NAND > > > T1042D4RDB_SPIFLASH P1020UTM-PC_36BIT_SDCARD T4160QDS_NAND > > > T2080RDB_SPIFLASH P1022DS_SPIFLASH T1042D4RDB_SDCARD > > > P1021RDB-PC_36BIT_SDCARD P1020RDB-PD_SDCARD P1022DS_36BIT_SPIFLASH > > > T1024RDB_SDCARD P1020UTM-PC_SDCARD P2020RDB-PC_36BIT_NAND > > > P2020RDB-PC_NAND T1023RDB_SPIFLASH P1010RDB-PB_36BIT_SPIFLASH > > > P1025RDB_NAND P1010RDB-PA_36BIT_SPIFLASH > > > blackfin: (for 34/35 boards) all +16.0 rodata +16.0 > > > x86: (for 9/9 boards) bss -14.2 rodata +14.2 > > > aarch64: (for 13/13 boards) all +17.2 rodata +17.2 > > > spl/u-boot-spl:all +151.4 spl/u-boot-spl:rodata +151.4 > > > avr32: (for 4/4 boards) all +16.0 rodata +16.0 > > > sandbox: (for 1/1 boards) all +16.0 rodata +16.0 > > > m68k: (for 48/48 boards) all +11.7 text +11.7 > > > powerpc: (for 412/416 boards) all +3.6 data +1.6 rodata +2.0 > > > spl/u-boot-spl:all +5.8 spl/u-boot-spl:rodata +5.0 > > > spl/u-boot-spl:text +0.8 > > > sparc: (for 5/5 boards) all +32.0 data +16.0 text +16.0 > > > sh: (for 21/22 boards) all +16.0 rodata +16.0 > > > nios2: (for 1/1 boards) all +16.0 data +16.0 > > > mips: (for 24/24 boards) all +20.0 bss +4.0 rodata +16.0 > > > arm: (for 531/531 boards) all +17.7 bss +0.3 rodata +17.4 > > > spl/u-boot-spl:all +69.0 spl/u-boot-spl:rodata +69.0 > > > nds32: (for 1/1 boards) all +16.0 rodata +16.0 > > > > Just what I was worried about. > > > > > So there are some code size changes (which may not be a big deal at 15 > > > -60 bytes) but it breaks lots of powerpc boards. > > > > > > Can we instead add CONFIG_SPL_OF_LIBFDT? > > > > What would be the difference between having CONFIG_OF_LIBFDT enabled in > > SPL (which is the case now) and having CONFIG_SPL_OF_LIBFDT enabled ? > > The naming seems a bit difficult to comprehend to me. > > Sorry for late reply as fully tight up with something. > > To minimize the impact, we can create fdtdec_get_uint32 in > lib/fdtdec_common.c. > Then we can drop this patch. > Any thought? Sounds good. Or you could use fdtdec_get_int(). Regards, Simon ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* [U-Boot] [PATCH v3 5/5] common: Enable fdt_support in SPL build 2015-09-23 15:38 ` Simon Glass @ 2015-09-30 0:32 ` Chin Liang See 0 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread From: Chin Liang See @ 2015-09-30 0:32 UTC (permalink / raw) To: u-boot Hi Simon, On Wed, 2015-09-23 at 10:39 +0000, Simon Glass wrote: > Hi, > > On 22 September 2015 at 21:10, Chin Liang See <clsee@altera.com> wrote: > > > > Hi, > > > > > From: marex at denx.de > > > Sent: Friday, September 11, 2015 8:45 AM > > > To: Simon Glass > > > Cc: Chin Liang See; ZY - u-boot; Dinh Nguyen; Dinh Nguyen; ZY - sr; Vikas Manocha; Jagannadh Teki; ZY - pavel > > > Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 5/5] common: Enable fdt_support in SPL build > > > > > > On Friday, September 11, 2015 at 02:14:17 AM, Simon Glass wrote: > > > > Hi, > > > > > > > > On 10 September 2015 at 04:49, Marek Vasut <marex@denx.de> wrote: > > > > > On Thursday, September 10, 2015 at 07:02:16 AM, Chin Liang See wrote: > > > > >> Enable more device tree function support such as > > > > >> fdt_getprop_u32_default_node in SPL. > > > > >> > > > > >> Signed-off-by: Chin Liang See <clsee@altera.com> > > > > >> Cc: Dinh Nguyen <dinguyen@opensource.altera.com> > > > > >> Cc: Dinh Nguyen <dinh.linux@gmail.com> > > > > >> Cc: Marek Vasut <marex@denx.de> > > > > >> Cc: Stefan Roese <sr@denx.de> > > > > >> Cc: Vikas Manocha <vikas.manocha@st.com> > > > > >> Cc: Jagannadh Teki <jteki@openedev.com> > > > > >> Cc: Pavel Machek <pavel@denx.de> > > > > > > > > > > +CC Simon, I'm worried this might blow the size of all SPLs , which is > > > > > not the thing we'd like to see. > > > > > > > > > >> --- > > > > >> > > > > >> common/Makefile | 4 ++-- > > > > >> 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > > > >> > > > > >> diff --git a/common/Makefile b/common/Makefile > > > > >> index 556fb07..9e059fe 100644 > > > > >> --- a/common/Makefile > > > > >> +++ b/common/Makefile > > > > >> @@ -97,7 +97,7 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_CMD_EXT4) += cmd_ext4.o > > > > >> > > > > >> obj-$(CONFIG_CMD_EXT2) += cmd_ext2.o > > > > >> obj-$(CONFIG_CMD_FAT) += cmd_fat.o > > > > >> obj-$(CONFIG_CMD_FDC) += cmd_fdc.o > > > > >> > > > > >> -obj-$(CONFIG_OF_LIBFDT) += cmd_fdt.o fdt_support.o > > > > >> +obj-$(CONFIG_OF_LIBFDT) += cmd_fdt.o > > > > >> > > > > >> obj-$(CONFIG_CMD_FITUPD) += cmd_fitupd.o > > > > >> obj-$(CONFIG_CMD_FLASH) += cmd_flash.o > > > > >> ifdef CONFIG_FPGA > > > > >> > > > > >> @@ -265,7 +265,7 @@ obj-y += malloc_simple.o > > > > >> > > > > >> endif > > > > >> obj-y += image.o > > > > >> obj-$(CONFIG_ANDROID_BOOT_IMAGE) += image-android.o > > > > >> > > > > >> -obj-$(CONFIG_OF_LIBFDT) += image-fdt.o > > > > >> +obj-$(CONFIG_OF_LIBFDT) += image-fdt.o fdt_support.o > > > > >> > > > > >> obj-$(CONFIG_FIT) += image-fit.o > > > > >> obj-$(CONFIG_FIT_SIGNATURE) += image-sig.o > > > > >> obj-$(CONFIG_IO_TRACE) += iotrace.o > > > > >> > > > > >> -- > > > > >> 1.7.7.4 > > > > > > > > It might need a bit of work - here's a buildman run: > > > > > > > > 02: common: Enable fdt_support in SPL build > > > > powerpc: + P1022DS_36BIT_NAND T1024RDB_SPIFLASH > > > > P1010RDB-PA_SPIFLASH P1021RDB-PC_36BIT_NAND T2080QDS_SPIFLASH > > > > P1025RDB_SDCARD P2020RDB-PC_36BIT_SPIFLASH T1042RDB_PI_SPIFLASH > > > > P1010RDB-PA_36BIT_NAND P1010RDB-PB_SDCARD P2020RDB-PC_SPIFLASH > > > > P1020MBG-PC_36BIT_SDCARD P1024RDB_SPIFLASH T1042D4RDB_NAND > > > > T4240RDB_SDCARD P1010RDB-PB_36BIT_NAND P1022DS_36BIT_SDCARD > > > > T1024QDS_NAND P1021RDB-PC_SPIFLASH T1024RDB_NAND T1023RDB_SDCARD > > > > P1010RDB-PB_36BIT_SDCARD P1022DS_NAND P1020RDB-PC_36BIT_NAND > > > > P1020RDB-PC_SDCARD T1042RDB_PI_NAND P1020RDB-PD_SPIFLASH T2080RDB_NAND > > > > P1022DS_SDCARD P1020RDB-PC_36BIT_SPIFLASH T1042RDB_PI_SDCARD > > > > T2081QDS_NAND T4160QDS_SDCARD P1010RDB-PB_SPIFLASH T2080QDS_SDCARD > > > > P1020MBG-PC_SDCARD P1020RDB-PC_SPIFLASH T4240QDS_SDCARD > > > > P2020RDB-PC_36BIT_SDCARD T1040RDB_SDCARD P1021RDB-PC_SDCARD > > > > B4860QDS_NAND T2080RDB_SDCARD P1020RDB-PC_36BIT_SDCARD > > > > T1040D4RDB_SDCARD T1040D4RDB_SPIFLASH P1020RDB-PC_NAND T2080QDS_NAND > > > > T1023RDB_NAND P1020RDB-PD_NAND T1040D4RDB_NAND P1010RDB-PA_NAND > > > > T1040RDB_SPIFLASH P2020RDB-PC_SDCARD T2081QDS_SDCARD > > > > P1010RDB-PA_36BIT_SDCARD P1024RDB_NAND P1024RDB_SDCARD T4240QDS_NAND > > > > C29XPCIE_NAND B4420QDS_NAND P1021RDB-PC_36BIT_SPIFLASH > > > > P1025RDB_SPIFLASH T2081QDS_SPIFLASH T1040RDB_NAND P1010RDB-PA_SDCARD > > > > P1010RDB-PB_NAND T1024QDS_SDCARD T1024QDS_SPIFLASH P1021RDB-PC_NAND > > > > T1042D4RDB_SPIFLASH P1020UTM-PC_36BIT_SDCARD T4160QDS_NAND > > > > T2080RDB_SPIFLASH P1022DS_SPIFLASH T1042D4RDB_SDCARD > > > > P1021RDB-PC_36BIT_SDCARD P1020RDB-PD_SDCARD P1022DS_36BIT_SPIFLASH > > > > T1024RDB_SDCARD P1020UTM-PC_SDCARD P2020RDB-PC_36BIT_NAND > > > > P2020RDB-PC_NAND T1023RDB_SPIFLASH P1010RDB-PB_36BIT_SPIFLASH > > > > P1025RDB_NAND P1010RDB-PA_36BIT_SPIFLASH > > > > blackfin: (for 34/35 boards) all +16.0 rodata +16.0 > > > > x86: (for 9/9 boards) bss -14.2 rodata +14.2 > > > > aarch64: (for 13/13 boards) all +17.2 rodata +17.2 > > > > spl/u-boot-spl:all +151.4 spl/u-boot-spl:rodata +151.4 > > > > avr32: (for 4/4 boards) all +16.0 rodata +16.0 > > > > sandbox: (for 1/1 boards) all +16.0 rodata +16.0 > > > > m68k: (for 48/48 boards) all +11.7 text +11.7 > > > > powerpc: (for 412/416 boards) all +3.6 data +1.6 rodata +2.0 > > > > spl/u-boot-spl:all +5.8 spl/u-boot-spl:rodata +5.0 > > > > spl/u-boot-spl:text +0.8 > > > > sparc: (for 5/5 boards) all +32.0 data +16.0 text +16.0 > > > > sh: (for 21/22 boards) all +16.0 rodata +16.0 > > > > nios2: (for 1/1 boards) all +16.0 data +16.0 > > > > mips: (for 24/24 boards) all +20.0 bss +4.0 rodata +16.0 > > > > arm: (for 531/531 boards) all +17.7 bss +0.3 rodata +17.4 > > > > spl/u-boot-spl:all +69.0 spl/u-boot-spl:rodata +69.0 > > > > nds32: (for 1/1 boards) all +16.0 rodata +16.0 > > > > > > Just what I was worried about. > > > > > > > So there are some code size changes (which may not be a big deal at 15 > > > > -60 bytes) but it breaks lots of powerpc boards. > > > > > > > > Can we instead add CONFIG_SPL_OF_LIBFDT? > > > > > > What would be the difference between having CONFIG_OF_LIBFDT enabled in > > > SPL (which is the case now) and having CONFIG_SPL_OF_LIBFDT enabled ? > > > The naming seems a bit difficult to comprehend to me. > > > > Sorry for late reply as fully tight up with something. > > > > To minimize the impact, we can create fdtdec_get_uint32 in > > lib/fdtdec_common.c. > > Then we can drop this patch. > > Any thought? > > Sounds good. Or you could use fdtdec_get_int(). > Cool, let me create the unsigned version. I was using int version initially but receiving concern on casting to convert to unsigned. Will send out v4 later. Thanks Chin Liang > Regards, > Simon ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2015-09-30 0:32 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2015-09-10 5:02 [U-Boot] [PATCH v3 5/5] common: Enable fdt_support in SPL build Chin Liang See
2015-09-10 11:49 ` Marek Vasut
2015-09-11 0:14 ` Simon Glass
2015-09-11 0:45 ` Marek Vasut
[not found] ` <0016CF5815A1B142902817051AF62EB305F787C6@PG-ITEXCH02.altera.priv.altera.com>
2015-09-23 3:10 ` Chin Liang See
2015-09-23 15:38 ` Simon Glass
2015-09-30 0:32 ` Chin Liang See
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox