From: Scott Wood <oss@buserror.net>
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de
Subject: [U-Boot] [PATCH 2/3][v3] Data types defined for 64 bit physical address
Date: Tue, 09 Feb 2016 23:10:33 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1455081033.2463.2.camel@buserror.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <AM4PR0401MB17322280B3070FF1D1C8FB089AD70@AM4PR0401MB1732.eurprd04.prod.outlook.com>
On Wed, 2016-02-10 at 02:30 +0000, york sun wrote:
> On 09/17/2015 03:48 AM, Aneesh Bansal wrote:
> > Data types and I/O functions have been defined for
> > 64 bit physical addresses in arm.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Aneesh Bansal <aneesh.bansal@freescale.com>
> > ---
> > Changes in v3:
> > Corrected the definition of virt_to_phys() and definition of phys_addr_t.
> >
> > arch/arm/include/asm/io.h | 4 ++--
> > arch/arm/include/asm/types.h | 10 +++++++---
> > 2 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/arch/arm/include/asm/io.h b/arch/arm/include/asm/io.h
> > index bfbe0a0..75773bd 100644
> > --- a/arch/arm/include/asm/io.h
> > +++ b/arch/arm/include/asm/io.h
> > @@ -46,7 +46,7 @@ static inline void sync(void)
> > static inline void *
> > map_physmem(phys_addr_t paddr, unsigned long len, unsigned long flags)
> > {
> > - return (void *)paddr;
> > + return (void *)((unsigned long)paddr);
> > }
> >
> > /*
> > @@ -59,7 +59,7 @@ static inline void unmap_physmem(void *vaddr, unsigned
> > long flags)
> >
> > static inline phys_addr_t virt_to_phys(void * vaddr)
> > {
> > - return (phys_addr_t)(vaddr);
> > + return (phys_addr_t)((unsigned long)vaddr);
> > }
> >
> > /*
> > diff --git a/arch/arm/include/asm/types.h b/arch/arm/include/asm/types.h
> > index ee77c41..388058e 100644
> > --- a/arch/arm/include/asm/types.h
> > +++ b/arch/arm/include/asm/types.h
> > @@ -45,12 +45,16 @@ typedef unsigned long long u64;
> > #define BITS_PER_LONG 32
> > #endif /* CONFIG_ARM64 */
> >
> > -/* Dma addresses are 32-bits wide. */
> > -
> > +#ifdef CONFIG_PHYS_64BIT
> > +typedef unsigned long long dma_addr_t;
> > +typedef unsigned long long phys_addr_t;
> > +typedef unsigned long long phys_size_t;
> > +#else
> > +/* DMA addresses are 32-bits wide */
> > typedef u32 dma_addr_t;
> > -
> > typedef unsigned long phys_addr_t;
> > typedef unsigned long phys_size_t;
> > +#endif
> >
> > #endif /* __KERNEL__ */
> >
> >
>
> Aneesh and Scott,
>
> I need to revisit this patch. Would it be better to change it as below?
>
> +#if defined(CONFIG_PHYS_64BIT) && !defined(CONFIG_ARM64)
> +typedef unsigned long long dma_addr_t;
> +typedef unsigned long long phys_addr_t;
> +typedef unsigned long long phys_size_t;
> +#else
> +/* DMA addresses are 32-bits wide */
> typedef u32 dma_addr_t;
> -
> typedef unsigned long phys_addr_t;
> typedef unsigned long phys_size_t;
> +#endif
>
> I am debugging another patch and found changing phys_addr_t makes some
> trouble
> for ARM64, especially to mix with ulong.
What sort of trouble is it causing? And why would you mix it with ulong?
-Scott
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-02-10 5:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-09-17 10:46 [U-Boot] [PATCH 1/3][v3] Pointers in ESBC header made 32 bit Aneesh Bansal
2015-09-17 10:46 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH 2/3][v3] Data types defined for 64 bit physical address Aneesh Bansal
2015-10-30 16:15 ` York Sun
2016-02-10 2:30 ` york sun
2016-02-10 5:10 ` Scott Wood [this message]
2016-02-10 5:20 ` york sun
2016-02-11 5:53 ` Aneesh Bansal
2016-02-23 1:38 ` Scott Wood
2016-02-23 2:05 ` york sun
2015-09-17 10:46 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH 3/3][v3] crypto/fsl: SEC driver cleanup for 64 bit and endianness Aneesh Bansal
2015-10-15 16:49 ` York Sun
2015-10-16 6:20 ` Bansal Aneesh
2015-10-30 16:14 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH 1/3][v3] Pointers in ESBC header made 32 bit York Sun
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1455081033.2463.2.camel@buserror.net \
--to=oss@buserror.net \
--cc=u-boot@lists.denx.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox