From: Ian Campbell <ijc+uboot@hellion.org.uk>
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de
Subject: [U-Boot] [PATCH] sunxi: mctl_mem_matches: Add missing memory barrier
Date: Fri, 22 Apr 2016 10:32:13 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1461317533.24107.22.camel@hellion.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <57109996.3080601@redhat.com>
On Fri, 2016-04-15 at 09:34 +0200, Hans de Goede wrote:
> > I wonder if what you are observing could be possibly explained by just
> > a usual data corruption problem? Which may be happening when the DRAM
> > clock speed is set higher than this particular device is able to handle
> > in a reliable way. Inserting just one or more NOP instructions instead
> > of the barrier could possibly change some timings too.
> >
> > If this patch helps, then it's fine. But I wonder if it is not merely
> > making the problem latent instead of fixing the root cause?
> I do believe that this patch addresses a real problem and is not hiding
> some dram timing issues, I might be wrong about the write-buffer being
> the cause, it could simply be that the compiler is doing something bad
> (despite the accesses being marked as volatile)??and that the DSB stops
> the compiler from optimizing things too much.
I have a _very_ vague memory of seeing something not disimilar to this
(apparent write buffer interactions with MMU disabled) in the early
days of Xen development, but that was probably on models and so may not
have been representative of the intended behaviour of eventual silicon.
It might be interesting to have a look at the generated assembly and
see if it differs in more or less than the addition of the single
instruction and perhaps experiment with just a compiler barrier.
Andre, do you have any insights on this?
Ian.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-04-22 9:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-04-14 16:58 [U-Boot] [PATCH] sunxi: mctl_mem_matches: Add missing memory barrier Hans de Goede
2016-04-15 0:46 ` Siarhei Siamashka
2016-04-15 7:34 ` Hans de Goede
2016-04-22 9:32 ` Ian Campbell [this message]
2016-04-22 10:48 ` Hans de Goede
2016-04-22 11:46 ` Andre Przywara
2016-04-22 12:09 ` Hans de Goede
2016-04-22 13:12 ` Andre Przywara
2016-04-22 13:20 ` Ian Campbell
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1461317533.24107.22.camel@hellion.org.uk \
--to=ijc+uboot@hellion.org.uk \
--cc=u-boot@lists.denx.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox