From: Scott Wood <oss@buserror.net>
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de
Subject: [U-Boot] [PATCH v2] common: env_nand: Ensure that we have nand_info[0] prior to use
Date: Mon, 15 Aug 2016 11:48:31 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1471279711.25630.270.camel@buserror.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1471276604-25544-1-git-send-email-trini@konsulko.com>
On Mon, 2016-08-15 at 11:56 -0400, Tom Rini wrote:
> Now that nand_info[] is an array of pointers we need to ensure that it's
> been populated prior to use.??We may for example have ENV in NAND set in
> configurations that run on boards with and without NAND (where default
> env is fine enough, such as omap3_beagle and beagleboard (NAND) vs
> beagle xM (no NAND)).
>
> Fixes: b616d9b0a708 ("nand: Embed mtd_info in struct nand_chip")
> Cc: Scott Wood <oss@buserror.net>
> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
> ---
> Changes in v2:
> - Oops, move check on the saveenv side in to erase_and_write_env
> ---
> ?common/env_nand.c | 9 +++++++--
> ?1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/common/env_nand.c b/common/env_nand.c
> index fc99a5e3fc0d..96a1020b5e79 100644
> --- a/common/env_nand.c
> +++ b/common/env_nand.c
> @@ -163,6 +163,9 @@ static int erase_and_write_env(const struct env_location
> *location,
> ?{
> ? int ret = 0;
> ?
> + if (!nand_info[0])
> + return 1;
> +
> ? printf("Erasing %s...\n", location->name);
> ? if (nand_erase_opts(nand_info[0], &location->erase_opts))
> ? return 1;
> @@ -244,10 +247,12 @@ static int readenv(size_t offset, u_char *buf)
> ?{
> ? size_t end = offset + CONFIG_ENV_RANGE;
> ? size_t amount_loaded = 0;
> - size_t blocksize, len;
> + size_t blocksize = 0, len;
> ? u_char *char_ptr;
> ?
> - blocksize = nand_info[0]->erasesize;
> + if (nand_info[0])
> + blocksize = nand_info[0]->erasesize;
> +
> ? if (!blocksize)
> ? return 1;
> ?
Messing around with blocksize rather than directly returning is awkward -- it
makes it look as if you could proceed with blocksize zero until you read the
next statement. ?And is there ever a case where blocksize can be zero, now
that uninitialized NAND devices will simply have a NULL pointer?
-Scott
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-08-15 16:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-08-15 15:56 [U-Boot] [PATCH v2] common: env_nand: Ensure that we have nand_info[0] prior to use Tom Rini
2016-08-15 16:48 ` Scott Wood [this message]
2016-08-15 16:54 ` Tom Rini
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1471279711.25630.270.camel@buserror.net \
--to=oss@buserror.net \
--cc=u-boot@lists.denx.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox