public inbox for u-boot@lists.denx.de
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Scott Wood <oss@buserror.net>
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de
Subject: [U-Boot] [PATCH] nand: Fix set_dev checks for no device
Date: Tue, 23 Aug 2016 17:07:17 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1471990037.25630.279.camel@buserror.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160823220442.zv3guwtetvua5lf3@atomide.com>

On Tue, 2016-08-23 at 15:04 -0700, Tony Lindgren wrote:
> * Scott Wood <oss@buserror.net> [160823 14:31]:
> > 
> > On Tue, 2016-08-23 at 14:26 -0700, Tony Lindgren wrote:
> > > 
> > > If we do nand device 0 command in u-boot on a device that has NAND
> > > support
> > > enabled but no NAND chip, we can get data abort at least on omaps.
> > > 
> > > Fix the issue by adding a check for nand_info[dev].
> > > 
> > > Signed-off-by: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
> > > --- a/cmd/nand.c
> > > +++ b/cmd/nand.c
> > > @@ -116,7 +116,7 @@ free_dat:
> > > ?static int set_dev(int dev)
> > > ?{
> > > ?	if (dev < 0 || dev >= CONFIG_SYS_MAX_NAND_DEVICE ||
> > > -	????!nand_info[dev]->name) {
> > > +	????!nand_info[dev] || !nand_info[dev]->name) {
> > > ?		puts("No such device\n");
> > > ?		return -1;
> > > ?	}
> > The new !nand_info[dev] check can replace the old name check (similarly to
> > how
> > commit?4cc9699be7ffc replaced the old zero-blocksize check).
> Do you mean we can now leave out the test for !nand_info[dev]->name
> in set_dev() with this patch?

Yes. ?It existed before because before the array-to-pointer conversion there
was no way to directly test nand_info[dev] for emptiness.

-Scott

  reply	other threads:[~2016-08-23 22:07 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-08-23 21:26 [U-Boot] [PATCH] nand: Fix set_dev checks for no device Tony Lindgren
2016-08-23 21:30 ` Scott Wood
2016-08-23 22:04   ` Tony Lindgren
2016-08-23 22:07     ` Scott Wood [this message]
2016-08-23 22:21       ` Tony Lindgren
2016-08-24  0:04         ` Scott Wood
2016-08-24 16:47           ` Tony Lindgren

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1471990037.25630.279.camel@buserror.net \
    --to=oss@buserror.net \
    --cc=u-boot@lists.denx.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox