From: Max Krummenacher <max.oss.09@gmail.com>
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de
Subject: [U-Boot] [PATCH] tools/env: fix environment alignment tests for block devices
Date: Sat, 19 Nov 2016 13:52:56 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1479559976.5509.8.camel@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CALtMJEDhDPsRTJn+0-DF5jGTvWiVWOO00E8chFoxrqe5HFcTXw@mail.gmail.com>
Hi Andreas
Am Freitag, den 18.11.2016, 14:26 +0100 schrieb Andreas Fenkart:
> 2016-11-18 11:38 GMT+01:00 Max Krummenacher <max.oss.09@gmail.com>:
> > commit 183923d3e412500bdc597d1745e2fb6f7f679ec7 enforces that the
> > environment must start at an erase block boundary.
> >
> > For block devices the sample fw_env.config does not mandate a erase block size
> > for block devices. A missing setting defaults to the full env size.
> >
> > Depending on the environment location the alignment check now errors out for
> > perfectly legal settings.
> >
> > Fix this by defaulting to the standard blocksize of 0x200 for environments
> > stored in a block device.
> > That keeps the fw_env.config files for block devices working even with that
> > new check.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Max Krummenacher <max.krummenacher@toradex.com>
> > ---
> >
> > tools/env/fw_env.c | 22 ++++++++++++++++++----
> > 1 file changed, 18 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/tools/env/fw_env.c b/tools/env/fw_env.c
> > index 3dc0d53..f2126f8 100644
> > --- a/tools/env/fw_env.c
> > +++ b/tools/env/fw_env.c
> > @@ -1335,10 +1335,25 @@ static int check_device_config(int dev)
> > goto err;
> > }
> > DEVTYPE(dev) = mtdinfo.type;
>
> There is 'erasesize' in that struct, not sure how reliable that is and
> if we shall rely on it. Any experiences on this?
> In general we should take that and in case it is wrong the user has to
> overwrite it in fw_env.config
>
> # mtdinfo /dev/mtd5
> mtd5
> Name: spi32766.0
> Type: nor
> Eraseblock size: 65536 bytes, 64.0 KiB
> Amount of eraseblocks: 8 (524288 bytes, 512.0 KiB)
> Minimum input/output unit size: 1 byte
> Sub-page size: 1 byte
> Character device major/minor: 90:10
> Bad blocks are allowed: false
> Device is writable: true
>
That is exactly the bug I try to fix.
(e)MMC/SD cards are not MTD devices, the concept of an erase block does
not exist for these devices:
# mtdinfo /dev/mmcblk0
libmtd: error!: "/dev/mmcblk0" is not a character device
mtdinfo: error!: cannot get information about MTD device "/dev/mmcblk0"
error 22 (Invalid argument)
> > + if (DEVESIZE(dev) == -1) {
> > + /* Assume the erase size is the same as the env-size */
> > + DEVESIZE(dev) = ENVSIZE(dev);
> > + /* Assume enough env sectors to cover the environment */
> > + ENVSECTORS(dev) = (ENVSIZE(dev) + DEVESIZE(dev) - 1) /
> > + DEVESIZE(dev);
>
> DIV_ROUND_UP
I will try if we are allowed to include the relevant header in this
userspace application.
Ups, someone defined that macro inside the file already, will use it.
>
> > + }
> > } else {
> > uint64_t size;
> > DEVTYPE(dev) = MTD_ABSENT;
> >
> > + if (DEVESIZE(dev) == -1) {
> > + /* Assume the erase size to be 512 bytes */
> > + DEVESIZE(dev) = 0x200;
> > + /* Assume enough env sectors to cover the environment */
> > + ENVSECTORS(dev) = (ENVSIZE(dev) + DEVESIZE(dev) - 1) /
> > + DEVESIZE(dev);
>
> DIV_ROUND_UP
Ok.
>
> > + }
> > +
> > /*
> > * Check for negative offsets, treat it as backwards offset
> > * from the end of the block device
> > @@ -1467,10 +1482,9 @@ static int get_config (char *fname)
> > DEVNAME(i) = devname;
> >
> > if (rc < 4)
> > - /* Assume the erase size is the same as the env-size */
> > - DEVESIZE(i) = ENVSIZE(i);
> > -
> > - if (rc < 5)
> > + /* Fixup later depending on DEVTYPE */
> > + DEVESIZE(i) = -1;
>
> I think we can rely on '0', since that is invalid already.
Actually that uncovered a bug I introduced. The fixup has to come
before the test 'if (DEVOFFSET(dev) % DEVESIZE(dev) != 0)' which
uses the values.
I will change to 0, aka rely on global variables defaulting to 0.
>
>
> > + else if (rc < 5)
> > /* Assume enough env sectors to cover the environment */
> > ENVSECTORS (i) = (ENVSIZE(i) + DEVESIZE(i) - 1) / DEVESIZE(i);
>
> I guess the !defined(CONFIG_FILE) has the same problem. Let's just
> ignore the cases rc < 4,5 here and handle them all in check_config.
I will remove the default handling in both cases in favor of handling this later
in check_device_config().
Will send a V2 shortly.
Regards
Max
prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-11-19 12:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-11-18 10:38 [U-Boot] [PATCH] tools/env: fix environment alignment tests for block devices Max Krummenacher
2016-11-18 13:26 ` Andreas Fenkart
2016-11-19 12:52 ` Max Krummenacher [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1479559976.5509.8.camel@gmail.com \
--to=max.oss.09@gmail.com \
--cc=u-boot@lists.denx.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox