* [U-Boot] u-boot.git or u-boot-x86.git for x86_64 u-boots? @ 2017-01-12 20:12 Joakim Tjernlund 2017-01-14 11:51 ` Bin Meng 0 siblings, 1 reply; 9+ messages in thread From: Joakim Tjernlund @ 2017-01-12 20:12 UTC (permalink / raw) To: u-boot I found two repos w.r.t x86_64 for u-boot, which one should I use? I am ATM only looking at USING the qemu-x86 target for now. BTW, I found tools/binman/binman.py only worked with python 2.7, maybe you can change the shebang to python2.7 as my default python is 3.4 Jocke ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* [U-Boot] u-boot.git or u-boot-x86.git for x86_64 u-boots? 2017-01-12 20:12 [U-Boot] u-boot.git or u-boot-x86.git for x86_64 u-boots? Joakim Tjernlund @ 2017-01-14 11:51 ` Bin Meng 2017-01-14 13:25 ` Joakim Tjernlund 2017-01-14 17:06 ` Simon Glass 0 siblings, 2 replies; 9+ messages in thread From: Bin Meng @ 2017-01-14 11:51 UTC (permalink / raw) To: u-boot +Simon, On Fri, Jan 13, 2017 at 4:12 AM, Joakim Tjernlund <Joakim.Tjernlund@infinera.com> wrote: > I found two repos w.r.t x86_64 for u-boot, which one should I use? > U-Boot x86_64 support is not in mainstream yet. > I am ATM only looking at USING the qemu-x86 target for now. > > BTW, I found tools/binman/binman.py only worked with python 2.7, maybe you can change > the shebang to python2.7 as my default python is 3.4 > Regards, Bin ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* [U-Boot] u-boot.git or u-boot-x86.git for x86_64 u-boots? 2017-01-14 11:51 ` Bin Meng @ 2017-01-14 13:25 ` Joakim Tjernlund 2017-01-14 13:30 ` Bin Meng 2017-01-14 17:06 ` Simon Glass 1 sibling, 1 reply; 9+ messages in thread From: Joakim Tjernlund @ 2017-01-14 13:25 UTC (permalink / raw) To: u-boot On Sat, 2017-01-14 at 19:51 +0800, Bin Meng wrote: > +Simon, > > On Fri, Jan 13, 2017 at 4:12 AM, Joakim Tjernlund > <Joakim.Tjernlund@infinera.com> wrote: > > I found two repos w.r.t x86_64 for u-boot, which one should I use? > > > > U-Boot x86_64 support is not in mainstream yet. So I should use u-boot-x86.git for now then. Strangely u-boot.git did work too. > > > I am ATM only looking at USING the qemu-x86 target for now. > > > > BTW, I found tools/binman/binman.py only worked with python 2.7, maybe you can change > > the shebang to python2.7 as my default python is 3.4 > > > > Regards, > Bin ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* [U-Boot] u-boot.git or u-boot-x86.git for x86_64 u-boots? 2017-01-14 13:25 ` Joakim Tjernlund @ 2017-01-14 13:30 ` Bin Meng 0 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread From: Bin Meng @ 2017-01-14 13:30 UTC (permalink / raw) To: u-boot Hi Joakim, On Sat, Jan 14, 2017 at 9:25 PM, Joakim Tjernlund <Joakim.Tjernlund@infinera.com> wrote: > On Sat, 2017-01-14 at 19:51 +0800, Bin Meng wrote: >> +Simon, >> >> On Fri, Jan 13, 2017 at 4:12 AM, Joakim Tjernlund >> <Joakim.Tjernlund@infinera.com> wrote: >> > I found two repos w.r.t x86_64 for u-boot, which one should I use? >> > >> >> U-Boot x86_64 support is not in mainstream yet. > > So I should use u-boot-x86.git for now then. > Strangely u-boot.git did work too. u-boot.git is the mainstream repo while u-boot-x86.git is the x86 repo which has WIP patches and queued to be pulled into u-boot.git Regards, Bin ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* [U-Boot] u-boot.git or u-boot-x86.git for x86_64 u-boots? 2017-01-14 11:51 ` Bin Meng 2017-01-14 13:25 ` Joakim Tjernlund @ 2017-01-14 17:06 ` Simon Glass 2017-01-15 16:49 ` Joakim Tjernlund 2017-01-24 14:12 ` Joakim Tjernlund 1 sibling, 2 replies; 9+ messages in thread From: Simon Glass @ 2017-01-14 17:06 UTC (permalink / raw) To: u-boot Hi Joakim, On 14 January 2017 at 04:51, Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> wrote: > +Simon, > > On Fri, Jan 13, 2017 at 4:12 AM, Joakim Tjernlund > <Joakim.Tjernlund@infinera.com> wrote: >> I found two repos w.r.t x86_64 for u-boot, which one should I use? >> > > U-Boot x86_64 support is not in mainstream yet. I'll be sending v3 fairly soon. But even then it is not complete. Various things need fixing up and polishing - e.g. SDRAM sizing, graphics ROMs, actually booting Linux! > >> I am ATM only looking at USING the qemu-x86 target for now. >> >> BTW, I found tools/binman/binman.py only worked with python 2.7, maybe you can change >> the shebang to python2.7 as my default python is 3.4 We should probably patch it to work on 3.4 also. >> > > Regards, > Bin Regards, Simon ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* [U-Boot] u-boot.git or u-boot-x86.git for x86_64 u-boots? 2017-01-14 17:06 ` Simon Glass @ 2017-01-15 16:49 ` Joakim Tjernlund 2017-01-16 1:20 ` Bin Meng 2017-01-16 2:50 ` Simon Glass 2017-01-24 14:12 ` Joakim Tjernlund 1 sibling, 2 replies; 9+ messages in thread From: Joakim Tjernlund @ 2017-01-15 16:49 UTC (permalink / raw) To: u-boot On Sat, 2017-01-14 at 10:06 -0700, Simon Glass wrote: > Hi Joakim, > > On 14 January 2017 at 04:51, Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> wrote: > > +Simon, > > > > On Fri, Jan 13, 2017 at 4:12 AM, Joakim Tjernlund > > <Joakim.Tjernlund@infinera.com> wrote: > > > I found two repos w.r.t x86_64 for u-boot, which one should I use? > > > > > > > U-Boot x86_64 support is not in mainstream yet. > > I'll be sending v3 fairly soon. But even then it is not complete. > Various things need fixing up and polishing - e.g. SDRAM sizing, > graphics ROMs, actually booting Linux! Great, getting closer every day. Any idea for how much is missing in u-boot to bring up a Rangeley(C2758), no graphics required. Need networking, rs232, USB and maybe SATA. Jocke ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* [U-Boot] u-boot.git or u-boot-x86.git for x86_64 u-boots? 2017-01-15 16:49 ` Joakim Tjernlund @ 2017-01-16 1:20 ` Bin Meng 2017-01-16 2:50 ` Simon Glass 1 sibling, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread From: Bin Meng @ 2017-01-16 1:20 UTC (permalink / raw) To: u-boot Hi Joakim, On Mon, Jan 16, 2017 at 12:49 AM, Joakim Tjernlund <Joakim.Tjernlund@infinera.com> wrote: > On Sat, 2017-01-14 at 10:06 -0700, Simon Glass wrote: >> Hi Joakim, >> >> On 14 January 2017 at 04:51, Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> wrote: >> > +Simon, >> > >> > On Fri, Jan 13, 2017 at 4:12 AM, Joakim Tjernlund >> > <Joakim.Tjernlund@infinera.com> wrote: >> > > I found two repos w.r.t x86_64 for u-boot, which one should I use? >> > > >> > >> > U-Boot x86_64 support is not in mainstream yet. >> >> I'll be sending v3 fairly soon. But even then it is not complete. >> Various things need fixing up and polishing - e.g. SDRAM sizing, >> graphics ROMs, actually booting Linux! > > Great, getting closer every day. > Any idea for how much is missing in u-boot to bring up a > Rangeley(C2758), no graphics required. Need networking, rs232, USB and maybe SATA. The effort won't be too much as Intel has an FSP for Rangeley. Regards, Bin ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* [U-Boot] u-boot.git or u-boot-x86.git for x86_64 u-boots? 2017-01-15 16:49 ` Joakim Tjernlund 2017-01-16 1:20 ` Bin Meng @ 2017-01-16 2:50 ` Simon Glass 1 sibling, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread From: Simon Glass @ 2017-01-16 2:50 UTC (permalink / raw) To: u-boot Hi Joakim, On 15 January 2017 at 09:49, Joakim Tjernlund <Joakim.Tjernlund@infinera.com> wrote: > On Sat, 2017-01-14 at 10:06 -0700, Simon Glass wrote: >> Hi Joakim, >> >> On 14 January 2017 at 04:51, Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> wrote: >> > +Simon, >> > >> > On Fri, Jan 13, 2017 at 4:12 AM, Joakim Tjernlund >> > <Joakim.Tjernlund@infinera.com> wrote: >> > > I found two repos w.r.t x86_64 for u-boot, which one should I use? >> > > >> > >> > U-Boot x86_64 support is not in mainstream yet. >> >> I'll be sending v3 fairly soon. But even then it is not complete. >> Various things need fixing up and polishing - e.g. SDRAM sizing, >> graphics ROMs, actually booting Linux! > > Great, getting closer every day. > Any idea for how much is missing in u-boot to bring up a > Rangeley(C2758), no graphics required. Need networking, rs232, USB and maybe SATA. If it uses an FSP then it probably isn't much work to get it running with 32-bit U-Boot. Bin is the expert here. For 64-bit, we have quite a few things to do. But note that 32-bit U-Boot can directly boot both 32-bit and 64-bit kernels. It does not have the 'UEFI' restriction of having to select your boot loader based on your kernel. Regards, Simon ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* [U-Boot] u-boot.git or u-boot-x86.git for x86_64 u-boots? 2017-01-14 17:06 ` Simon Glass 2017-01-15 16:49 ` Joakim Tjernlund @ 2017-01-24 14:12 ` Joakim Tjernlund 1 sibling, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread From: Joakim Tjernlund @ 2017-01-24 14:12 UTC (permalink / raw) To: u-boot On Sat, 2017-01-14 at 10:06 -0700, Simon Glass wrote: > Hi Joakim, > > On 14 January 2017 at 04:51, Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> wrote: > > +Simon, > > > > On Fri, Jan 13, 2017 at 4:12 AM, Joakim Tjernlund > > <Joakim.Tjernlund@infinera.com> wrote: > > > I found two repos w.r.t x86_64 for u-boot, which one should I use? > > > > > > > U-Boot x86_64 support is not in mainstream yet. > > I'll be sending v3 fairly soon. But even then it is not complete. > Various things need fixing up and polishing - e.g. SDRAM sizing, > graphics ROMs, actually booting Linux! > > > > > > I am ATM only looking at USING the qemu-x86 target for now. > > > > > > BTW, I found tools/binman/binman.py only worked with python 2.7, maybe you can change > > > the shebang to python2.7 as my default python is 3.4 > > We should probably patch it to work on 3.4 also. I did a quick test using: 2to3 -w binman.py This makes binman.py "build" on both 2.7 and 3.4 but running it on 3.4 hangs forever until Ctrl-C: BINMAN u-boot.rom Traceback (most recent call last): File "./tools/binman/binman", line 113, in <module> ret_code = RunBinman(options, args) File "./tools/binman/binman", line 101, in RunBinman ret_code = control.Binman(options, args) File "/usr/local/src/u-boot-x86/tools/binman/control.py", line 95, in Binman fdt = fdt_select.FdtScan(dtb_fname) File "/usr/local/src/u-boot-x86/tools/binman/../dtoc/fdt_select.py", line 28, in FdtScan dtb.Scan() File "/usr/local/src/u-boot-x86/tools/binman/../dtoc/fdt.py", line 229, in Scan self._root.Scan() File "/usr/local/src/u-boot-x86/tools/binman/../dtoc/fdt_fallback.py", line 61, in Scan for name, byte_list_str in self._fdt.GetProps(self.path).items(): File "/usr/local/src/u-boot-x86/tools/binman/../dtoc/fdt_fallback.py", line 128, in GetProps out = command.Output('fdtget', self._fname, node, '-p') File "/usr/local/src/u-boot-x86/tools/binman/../patman/command.py", line 109, in Output return RunPipe([cmd], capture=True, raise_on_error=raise_on_error).stdout File "/usr/local/src/u-boot-x86/tools/binman/../patman/command.py", line 97, in RunPipe last_pipe.CommunicateFilter(None)) File "/usr/local/src/u-boot-x86/tools/binman/../patman/cros_subprocess.py", line 168, in CommunicateFilter rlist, wlist, _ = select.select(read_set, write_set, [], 0.2) KeyboardInterrupt Makefile:1070: recipe for target 'u-boot.rom' failed make: *** [u-boot.rom] Error 1 Please just change shebang to python2.7 for now. This is the only fix needed to build the x86 qemu target. Jocke ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2017-01-24 14:12 UTC | newest] Thread overview: 9+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed -- links below jump to the message on this page -- 2017-01-12 20:12 [U-Boot] u-boot.git or u-boot-x86.git for x86_64 u-boots? Joakim Tjernlund 2017-01-14 11:51 ` Bin Meng 2017-01-14 13:25 ` Joakim Tjernlund 2017-01-14 13:30 ` Bin Meng 2017-01-14 17:06 ` Simon Glass 2017-01-15 16:49 ` Joakim Tjernlund 2017-01-16 1:20 ` Bin Meng 2017-01-16 2:50 ` Simon Glass 2017-01-24 14:12 ` Joakim Tjernlund
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox