From: Dalon Westergreen <dwesterg@gmail.com>
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de
Subject: [U-Boot] [PATCH 1/2] common: image: update boot_get_fpga to support arbitrary fpga image
Date: Sun, 19 Feb 2017 12:58:44 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1487537924.13957.20.camel@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <a278b0b9-f6e6-69b7-e4a6-cd93e5182431@denx.de>
On Sun, 2017-02-19 at 21:49 +0100, Marek Vasut wrote:
> On 02/19/2017 09:43 PM, Dalon Westergreen wrote:
> >
> > On Sun, 2017-02-19 at 21:07 +0100, Marek Vasut wrote:
> > >
> > > On 02/19/2017 08:49 PM, Dalon Westergreen wrote:
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > The implementation of boot_get_fpga only supported one fpga family.
> > > > This modification allows for any of the fpga devices supported by
> > > > fpga_load to be used.
> > > >
> > > > Signed-off-by: Dalon Westergreen <dwesterg@gmail.com>
> > >
> > > +CC Xilinx friends :)
> > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > ---
> > > > ?common/image.c | 37 ++++++++++++++++++++++---------------
> > > > ?1 file changed, 22 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
> > > >
> > > > diff --git a/common/image.c b/common/image.c
> > > > index 0f88984..792d371 100644
> > > > --- a/common/image.c
> > > > +++ b/common/image.c
> > > > @@ -1306,7 +1306,7 @@ int boot_get_setup(bootm_headers_t *images,
> > > > uint8_t
> > > > arch,
> > > > ?}
> > > > ?
> > > > ?#if IMAGE_ENABLE_FIT
> > > > -#if defined(CONFIG_FPGA) && defined(CONFIG_FPGA_XILINX)
> > > > +#if defined(CONFIG_FPGA)
> > > > ?int boot_get_fpga(int argc, char * const argv[], bootm_headers_t
> > > > *images,
> > > > ? ??uint8_t arch, const ulong *ld_start, ulong * const
> > > > ld_len)
> > > > ?{
> > > > @@ -1318,7 +1318,8 @@ int boot_get_fpga(int argc, char * const argv[],
> > > > bootm_headers_t *images,
> > > > ? int err;
> > > > ? int devnum = 0; /* TODO support multi fpga platforms */
> > > > ? const fpga_desc * const desc = fpga_get_desc(devnum);
> > > > - xilinx_desc *desc_xilinx = desc->devdesc;
> > > > + xilinx_desc *desc_xilinx;
> > > > + bitstream_type bstype;
> > > > ?
> > > > ? /* Check to see if the images struct has a FIT configuration */
> > > > ? if (!genimg_has_config(images)) {
> > > > @@ -1365,22 +1366,28 @@ int boot_get_fpga(int argc, char * const argv[],
> > > > bootm_headers_t *images,
> > > > ? return fit_img_result;
> > > > ? }
> > > > ?
> > > > - if (img_len >= desc_xilinx->size) {
> > > > + switch (desc->devtype) {
> > >
> > > Do we need the switch statement at all ? We can have full configuration
> > > as a default mode of operation and have something like
> > >
> > > if (xilinx) {
> > > ?if (partial reconfiguration) {
> > > ? do_special_setup();
> > > ?}
> > > }
> >
> > I only did the switch stuff b/c i envisioned a need for partial image
> > support for socfpga.
>
> That'd be seriously cool :)
>
> >
> > That said, i would suggest, as you mention, moving
> > this to platform specific code and perhaps an indication of the image type
> > in the fitimage.
>
> driver-specific code . It doesn't need to know the imagetype, just that
> the blob that you passed in is a partial-reconfiguration blob. I never
> really worked with P/R though, do you need some other metadata for that
> or is it contained in that P/R bitstream blob already ?
as far as i understand it, it is all in the blob. ?All that is needed is knowing
whether the blob is a full or partial image. ?X seems to just use the image size
to determine this, but that means having a table of all devices and their
respective full image size. ?seems simpler to just specify the image type is
partial or not in the fitimage.
> >
> > >
> > >
> > > But even better would be to move this platform-dependent stuff into
> > > drivers/fpga/ or somewhere there. This is common code, so it shouldn't
> > > be here in the first place.
> >
> > My preference would be to only call fpga_load and have the platform
>
> s/platform/driver/
>
> >
> > specific stuff figure out what they want to do.
>
> Agreed
>
> >
> > My next comment would be
> > that perhaps it is best to add an fpgap type or some such in the fitimage
> > to specify the image is a partial image rather than looking at the image
> > size?
>
> Hmmmm, see my question above. If the driver cannot discern it from the
> blob, maybe a DT-alike property would work. ie. the image entry would
> also have a "xlnx,partial-reconfiguration" property or somesuch .
I dont think the property need be fpga vendor specific.?
--dalon
> >
> > Also a consideration is that there should be a means of specifying the fpga
> > devnum somehow in the fitimage???it is plausible that a system could have
> > multiple fpgas, no?
>
> Hmmmm, yeeeeees, system with multiple FPGAs, I like that :-) Probably a
> similar DT prop in the fitimage indicating where this bitstream goes
> would do, like loadaddress for kernel, it'd be FPGA devid for bitstream.
>
> >
> > --dalon
> >
> > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > + case fpga_xilinx:
> > > > + desc_xilinx = desc->devdesc;
> > > > + if (img_len >= desc_xilinx->size) {
> > > > + name = "full";
> > > > + bstype = BIT_FULL;
> > > > + } else {
> > > > + name = "partial";
> > > > + bstype = BIT_PARTIAL;
> > > > + }
> > > > + break;
> > > > + default:
> > > > ? name = "full";
> > > > - err = fpga_loadbitstream(devnum, (char
> > > > *)img_data,
> > > > - ?img_len, BIT_FULL);
> > > > - if (err)
> > > > - err = fpga_load(devnum, (const void
> > > > *)img_data,
> > > > - img_len, BIT_FULL);
> > > > - } else {
> > > > - name = "partial";
> > > > - err = fpga_loadbitstream(devnum, (char
> > > > *)img_data,
> > > > - ?img_len, BIT_PARTIAL);
> > > > - if (err)
> > > > - err = fpga_load(devnum, (const void
> > > > *)img_data,
> > > > - img_len, BIT_PARTIAL);
> > > > + bstype = BIT_FULL;
> > > > ? }
> > > > ?
> > > > + err = fpga_loadbitstream(devnum, (char *)img_data,
> > > > + ?img_len, bstype);
> > > > + if (err)
> > > > + err = fpga_load(devnum, (const void *)img_data,
> > > > + img_len, bstype);
> > > > +
> > > > ? if (err)
> > > > ? return err;
> > > > ?
> > > >
> > >
> > >
>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-02-19 20:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-02-19 19:49 [U-Boot] [PATCH 0/2] common: fitimage support for arbitrary fpga type Dalon Westergreen
2017-02-19 19:49 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH 1/2] common: image: update boot_get_fpga to support arbitrary fpga image Dalon Westergreen
2017-02-19 20:07 ` Marek Vasut
2017-02-19 20:43 ` Dalon Westergreen
2017-02-19 20:49 ` Marek Vasut
2017-02-19 20:58 ` Dalon Westergreen [this message]
2017-02-19 21:12 ` Marek Vasut
2017-02-19 21:21 ` Dalon Westergreen
2017-02-19 21:26 ` Marek Vasut
2017-02-20 9:24 ` Michal Simek
2017-02-20 14:24 ` Dalon Westergreen
2017-02-20 9:22 ` Michal Simek
2017-02-20 14:30 ` Dalon Westergreen
2017-02-20 14:59 ` Michal Simek
2017-02-20 17:35 ` Moritz Fischer
2017-02-20 22:38 ` Marek Vasut
2017-02-19 19:49 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH 2/2] common: bootm: add support for arbitrary fgpa configuration Dalon Westergreen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1487537924.13957.20.camel@gmail.com \
--to=dwesterg@gmail.com \
--cc=u-boot@lists.denx.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox