From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Chee, Tien Fong Date: Tue, 7 Nov 2017 04:46:02 +0000 Subject: [U-Boot] [PATCH v5 07/18] socfpga: boot0 hook: adjust to unified boot0 semantics In-Reply-To: References: <1507645279-25188-1-git-send-email-philipp.tomsich@theobroma-systems.com> <1507645279-25188-8-git-send-email-philipp.tomsich@theobroma-systems.com> <1418646C-5077-4104-BDB9-332D24920AD5@theobroma-systems.com> Message-ID: <1510029961.2479.0.camel@intel.com> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable To: u-boot@lists.denx.de On Isn, 2017-11-06 at 18:57 +0100, Marek Vasut wrote: > On 11/06/2017 06:55 PM, Dr. Philipp Tomsich wrote: > >=20 > >=20 > > >=20 > > > On 6 Nov 2017, at 18:54, Marek Vasut > > > wrote: > > >=20 > > > On 11/06/2017 06:26 PM, Dr. Philipp Tomsich wrote: > > > >=20 > > > > Marek & Tien Fong, > > > >=20 > > > > could either of you have a look at the below change (in the > > > > context of > > > > https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/823872/, which is also > > > > contained in=C2=A0 > > > > the same series) and give me an ok on this, so I can merge this > > > > series > > > > early in the upcoming merge window? > > > Please stop top-posting. > > >=20 > > > Does it still generate that structure at offset 0x40 in u- > > > boot*sfp on > > > SoCFPGA ? If so, fine by me. > > Yes it does. > > And the binary still looks the same around the magic offset. > OK, fine by me then. >=20 Fine by me too.