From: Chee, Tien Fong <tien.fong.chee@intel.com>
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de
Subject: [U-Boot] [PATCH v8 4/4] common: Generic firmware loader for file system
Date: Thu, 22 Feb 2018 08:18:01 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1519287480.9210.14.camel@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <6406826c-2092-a616-1adc-d3c8f735d1a8@denx.de>
On Thu, 2018-02-15 at 15:58 +0100, Marek Vasut wrote:
> On 02/05/2018 08:06 AM, tien.fong.chee at intel.com wrote:
> >
> > From: Tien Fong Chee <tien.fong.chee@intel.com>
> >
> > This is file system generic loader which can be used to load
> > the file image from the storage into target such as memory.
> > The consumer driver would then use this loader to program whatever,
> > ie. the FPGA device.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Tien Fong Chee <tien.fong.chee@intel.com>
> > Reviewed-by: Lothar Waßmann <LW@KARO-electronics.de>
> [...]
>
> >
> > +#include <common.h>
> > +#include <errno.h>
> > +#include <fs.h>
> > +#include <fs_loader.h>
> > +#include <nand.h>
> > +#include <sata.h>
> > +#include <spi.h>
> > +#include <spi_flash.h>
> > +#ifdef CONFIG_SPL
> Are the ifdefs needed ?
>
Because spl.h contains some codes have its dependency with SPL. So, Tom
adviced to make this part of code depend on CONFIG_SPL.
However, only __weak int init_mmc() depend on the codes from spl.h, so
user can override their own init_mmc() if SPL is not used.
> >
> > +#include <spl.h>
> > +#endif
> > +#include <linux/string.h>
> > +#ifdef CONFIG_CMD_UBIFS
> > +#include <ubi_uboot.h>
> > +#include <ubifs_uboot.h>
> > +#endif
> > +#include <usb.h>
> > +
> > +struct firmware_priv {
> > + const char *name; /* Filename */
> > + u32 offset; /* Offset of reading a file */
> > +};
> > +
> > +static struct device_location default_locations[] = {
> > + {
> > + .name = "mmc",
> > + .devpart = "0:1",
> > + },
> > + {
> > + .name = "usb",
> > + .devpart = "0:1",
> > + },
> > + {
> > + .name = "sata",
> > + .devpart = "0:1",
> > + },
> How can this load from UBI if it's not listed here ?
>
> >
> > +};
> > +
> > +/* USB build is not supported yet in SPL */
> > +#ifndef CONFIG_SPL_BUILD
> > +#ifdef CONFIG_USB_STORAGE
> > +static int init_usb(void)
> > +{
> > + int err;
> > +
> > + err = usb_init();
> > + if (err)
> > + return err;
> > +
> > +#ifndef CONFIG_DM_USB
> > + err = usb_stor_scan(1);
> mode = 0 I think, we don't need this verbose output.
>
Okay so i will change to usb_stor_scan(0) .
> >
> > + if (err)
> > + return err;
> > +#endif
> > +
> > + return err;
> > +}
> > +#else
> > +static int init_usb(void)
> > +{
> > + debug("Error: Cannot load flash image: no USB support\n");
> > + return -ENOSYS;
> > +}
> > +#endif
> > +#endif
> > +
> > +#ifdef CONFIG_SATA
> > +static int init_storage_sata(void)
> > +{
> > + return sata_probe(0);
> Shouldn't the sata device number be pulled from devpart in
> default_locations table ?
>
This may need to add the logic for splitting the device number and
partition into integer from the string. Let me think how to do it, may
be i can leverage existing code.
> >
> > +}
> > +#else
> > +static int init_storage_sata(void)
> > +{
> > + debug("Error: Cannot load image: no SATA support\n");
> > + return -ENOSYS;
> > +}
> > +#endif
> > +
> > +#ifdef CONFIG_CMD_UBIFS
> > +static int mount_ubifs(struct device_location *location)
> > +{
> > + int ret;
> > + char cmd[32];
> > +
> > + if (ret = ubi_part(location->mtdpart, NULL)) {
> > + debug("Cannot find mtd partition %s\n", location-
> > >mtdpart);
> > + return ret;
> > + }
> > +
> > + return cmd_ubifs_mount(location->ubivol);
> > +}
> > +
> > +static int umount_ubifs(void)
> > +{
> > + return cmd_ubifs_umount();
> > +}
> > +#else
> > +static int mount_ubifs(struct device_location *location)
> > +{
> > + debug("Error: Cannot load image: no UBIFS support\n");
> > + return -ENOSYS;
> > +}
> > +#endif
> > +
> > +#if defined(CONFIG_SPL_MMC_SUPPORT) && defined(CONFIG_SPL_BUILD)
> > +__weak int init_mmc(void)
> > +{
> > + /* Just for the case MMC is not yet initialized */
> > + struct mmc *mmc = NULL;
> > + int err;
> > +
> > +#ifdef CONFIG_SPL
> > + spl_mmc_find_device(&mmc, spl_boot_device());
> > +#else
> > + debug("#define CONFIG_SPL is required or overrriding
> > %s\n",
> > + __func__);
> This can be a compile-time error, maybe ?
>
No compile error. When you open the file, "%s\n" is actually same line
with debug("..... .
> >
> > + return -ENOENT;
> > +#endif
> > +
> > + err = mmc_init(mmc);
> > + if (err) {
> > + debug("spl: mmc init failed with error: %d\n",
> > err);
> > + return err;
> > + }
> > +
> > + return err;
> > +}
> > +#else
> > +__weak int init_mmc(void)
> > +{
> > + /* Expect somewhere already initialize MMC */
> > + return 0;
> > +}
> > +#endif
> [...]
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-02-22 8:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-02-05 7:06 [U-Boot] [PATCH v8 0/4] Generic firmware loader tien.fong.chee at intel.com
2018-02-05 7:06 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH v8 1/4] spl: Remove static declaration on spl_mmc_find_device function tien.fong.chee at intel.com
2018-02-15 14:58 ` Marek Vasut
2018-02-05 7:06 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH v8 2/4] cmd: ubifs: Move ubifs_initialized checking into cmd_ubifs_umount() tien.fong.chee at intel.com
2018-02-15 14:58 ` Marek Vasut
2018-02-05 7:06 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH v8 3/4] cmd: ubifs: Factor out some checking codes into cmd_ubifs_mount() tien.fong.chee at intel.com
2018-02-15 14:59 ` Marek Vasut
2018-02-22 6:04 ` Chee, Tien Fong
2018-02-05 7:06 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH v8 4/4] common: Generic firmware loader for file system tien.fong.chee at intel.com
2018-02-15 14:58 ` Marek Vasut
2018-02-22 8:18 ` Chee, Tien Fong [this message]
2018-02-22 14:28 ` Marek Vasut
2018-02-22 15:50 ` Tom Rini
2018-02-26 6:22 ` Chee, Tien Fong
2018-02-26 6:20 ` Chee, Tien Fong
2018-02-22 9:02 ` Lothar Waßmann
2018-02-26 6:24 ` Chee, Tien Fong
2018-02-15 10:22 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH v8 0/4] Generic firmware loader Chee, Tien Fong
2018-02-15 10:28 ` Chee, Tien Fong
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1519287480.9210.14.camel@intel.com \
--to=tien.fong.chee@intel.com \
--cc=u-boot@lists.denx.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox