[U-Boot] [PATCH] armv7: Move save_boot_params_default() to start.S

[U-Boot] [PATCH] armv7: Move save_boot_params_default() to start.S

[Benoît Thébaudeau]

save_boot_params() is called by start.S, so move its default implementation to
this file too. This is also useful for boards willing to use nand_spl since
cpu.c is not built in this case.

Signed-off-by: Beno?t Th?baudeau <benoit.thebaudeau@advansee.com>
Cc: Albert Aribaud <albert.u.boot@aribaud.net>
---
 .../arch/arm/cpu/armv7/cpu.c                       |    7 -------
 .../arch/arm/cpu/armv7/start.S                     |    7 +++++++
 2 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)

diff --git u-boot-4d3c95f.orig/arch/arm/cpu/armv7/cpu.c u-boot-4d3c95f/arch/arm/cpu/armv7/cpu.c
index c6fa8ef..b0677f4 100644
--- u-boot-4d3c95f.orig/arch/arm/cpu/armv7/cpu.c
+++ u-boot-4d3c95f/arch/arm/cpu/armv7/cpu.c
@@ -37,13 +37,6 @@
 #include <asm/cache.h>
 #include <asm/armv7.h>
 
-void save_boot_params_default(u32 r0, u32 r1, u32 r2, u32 r3)
-{
-}
-
-void save_boot_params(u32 r0, u32 r1, u32 r2, u32 r3)
-	__attribute__((weak, alias("save_boot_params_default")));
-
 int cleanup_before_linux(void)
 {
 	/*
diff --git u-boot-4d3c95f.orig/arch/arm/cpu/armv7/start.S u-boot-4d3c95f/arch/arm/cpu/armv7/start.S
index aee27fd..6df9c91 100644
--- u-boot-4d3c95f.orig/arch/arm/cpu/armv7/start.S
+++ u-boot-4d3c95f/arch/arm/cpu/armv7/start.S
@@ -119,6 +119,13 @@ FIQ_STACK_START:
 IRQ_STACK_START_IN:
 	.word	0x0badc0de
 
+.globl save_boot_params_default
+save_boot_params_default:
+	mov	pc, lr
+
+.weak save_boot_params
+save_boot_params = save_boot_params_default
+
 /*
  * the actual reset code
  */

[U-Boot] [PATCH] armv7: Move save_boot_params_default() to start.S

[Tom Rini]

On Fri, Aug 10, 2012 at 11:59:09PM +0200, Beno??t Th??baudeau wrote:

> save_boot_params() is called by start.S, so move its default implementation to
> this file too. This is also useful for boards willing to use nand_spl since
> cpu.c is not built in this case.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Beno??t Th??baudeau <benoit.thebaudeau@advansee.com>
> Cc: Albert Aribaud <albert.u.boot@aribaud.net>

We should pick up http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/169561/ instead as
yours is missing START/ENDPROC and doesn't just declare the initial
implementation weak.

-- 
Tom

[U-Boot] [PATCH] armv7: Move save_boot_params_default() to start.S

[Benoît Thébaudeau]

On Sat, Aug 11, 2012 at 12:44:34 AM +0200, Tom Rini wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 10, 2012 at 11:59:09PM +0200, Beno?t Th?baudeau wrote:
> 
> > save_boot_params() is called by start.S, so move its default
> > implementation to
> > this file too. This is also useful for boards willing to use
> > nand_spl since
> > cpu.c is not built in this case.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Beno?t Th?baudeau <benoit.thebaudeau@advansee.com>
> > Cc: Albert Aribaud <albert.u.boot@aribaud.net>
> 
> We should pick up http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/169561/ instead
> as
> yours is missing START/ENDPROC

Yes.

> and doesn't just declare the initial
> implementation weak.

What do you mean? It does:
+.weak save_boot_params

One version or the other, I don't care as long as one of them is applied. Why
has Tetsuyuki's patch still not been applied? You've ack'ed it on 7/9.

Best regards,
Beno?t

[U-Boot] [PATCH] armv7: Move save_boot_params_default() to start.S

[Tom Rini]

On 08/10/2012 04:12 PM, Beno?t Th?baudeau wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 11, 2012 at 12:44:34 AM +0200, Tom Rini wrote:
>> On Fri, Aug 10, 2012 at 11:59:09PM +0200, Beno?t Th?baudeau wrote:
>>
>>> save_boot_params() is called by start.S, so move its default
>>> implementation to
>>> this file too. This is also useful for boards willing to use
>>> nand_spl since
>>> cpu.c is not built in this case.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Beno?t Th?baudeau <benoit.thebaudeau@advansee.com>
>>> Cc: Albert Aribaud <albert.u.boot@aribaud.net>
>>
>> We should pick up http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/169561/ instead
>> as
>> yours is missing START/ENDPROC
> 
> Yes.
> 
>> and doesn't just declare the initial
>> implementation weak.
> 
> What do you mean? It does:
> +.weak save_boot_params

Yes, but you add save_boot_params_default and alias it.  That's extra
work we don't need :)

> One version or the other, I don't care as long as one of them is applied. Why
> has Tetsuyuki's patch still not been applied? You've ack'ed it on 7/9.

Bad timing around the v2012.07 release.  If Albert doesn't pick it up
next time he goes around I'll add it to a staging tree and send a request.

-- 
Tom