[U-Boot] [PATCH v8 2/8] ARM: socfpga: Add default FPGA bitstream fitImage for Arria10 SoCDK

[Chee, Tien Fong <tien.fong.chee@intel.com>]

On Thu, 2019-02-14 at 00:04 +0100, Marek Vasut wrote:
> On 2/13/19 11:45 PM, Dalon L Westergreen wrote:
> > 
> > On Wed, 2019-02-13 at 17:10 +0100, Marek Vasut wrote:
> > > 
> > > On 2/13/19 3:18 PM, tien.fong.chee at intel.com wrote:
> > > > 
> > > > From: Tien Fong Chee <tien.fong.chee@intel.com>
> > > > 
> > > > Add default fitImage file bundling FPGA bitstreams for Arria10.
> > > > 
> > > > Signed-off-by: Tien Fong Chee <tien.fong.chee@intel.com>
> > > > 
> > > > ---
> > > > 
> > > > changes for v8
> > > > - Changed the FPGA node name to fpga-core and fpga-periph for
> > > > both core and
> > > >   periph bitstreams respectively.
> > > > ---
> > > >  board/altera/arria10-socdk/fit_spl_fpga.its | 39
> > > > +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > > >  1 file changed, 39 insertions(+)
> > > >  create mode 100644 board/altera/arria10-socdk/fit_spl_fpga.its
> > > > 
> > > > diff --git a/board/altera/arria10-socdk/fit_spl_fpga.its
> > > > b/board/altera/arria10-socdk/fit_spl_fpga.its
> > > > new file mode 100644
> > > > index 0000000..8ce175b
> > > > --- /dev/null
> > > > +++ b/board/altera/arria10-socdk/fit_spl_fpga.its
> > > > @@ -0,0 +1,39 @@
> > > > +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
> > > > + /*
> > > > + * Copyright (C) 2019 Intel Corporation <www.intel.com>
> > > > + *
> > > > + */
> > > > +
> > > > +/dts-v1/;
> > > > +
> > > > +/ {
> > > > +	description = "FIT image with FPGA bistream";
> > > > +	#address-cells = <1>;
> > > > +
> > > > +	images {
> > > > +		fpga-core at 1 {
> > > > +			description = "FPGA core bitstream";
> > > > +			data =
> > > > /incbin/("../../../ghrd_10as066n2.core.rbf");
> > > > +			type = "fpga";
> > > > +			arch = "arm";
> > > > +			compression = "none";
> > > > +			load = <0x400>;
> > > Is the load address required ?
It is optional for telling destination address of DDR where this
core.rbf going to be loaded. If load property, the default OCRAM buffer
would be used, bad for performance when loading chunk by chunk.
> > > 
> > > > 
> > > > +		};
> > > > +
> > > > +		fpga-periph at 2 {
> > > > +			description = "FPGA peripheral
> > > > bitstream";
> > > > +			data =
> > > > /incbin/("../../../ghrd_10as066n2.periph.rbf");
> > > > +			type = "fpga";
> > > > +			arch = "arm";
> > > > +			compression = "none";
> > > > +		};
> > > > +	};
> > > > +
> > > > +	configurations {
> > > > +		default = "config-1";
> > > > +		config-1 {
> > > > +			description = "Boot with FPGA early IO
> > > > release config";
> > > > +			fpga = "fpga-periph at 2", "fpga-core at 1";
> > > Don't you need to load the core first ?
> > No, the periphery is first.  This brings up the dram and i/o.
> Then why do we have periph at 2 above ? Shouldn't those two images be
> swapped to make this look less confusing ?
The ordering in configuration fpga property doesn't matter, the driver
smart enough to determine what bitstream need to be programmed at what
FPGA mode.

The image fpga-core at 1 is alligned at 1st just for avoiding 
the performance penalty.
>