From: Weijie Gao <weijie.gao@mediatek.com>
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de
Subject: [PATCH 11/16] lib: enable lzma decompression support for SPL build
Date: Thu, 9 Jan 2020 16:10:12 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1578557412.5535.7.camel@mcddlt001> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <22c3ad4c-aa4c-9a26-b552-e3e711856ea2@gmx.de>
On Wed, 2020-01-08 at 08:22 +0100, Heinrich Schuchardt wrote:
>
> On 1/8/20 4:01 AM, Weijie Gao wrote:
> > This patch enables LZMA decompression support for SPL build
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Weijie Gao <weijie.gao@mediatek.com>
> > ---
> > lib/Kconfig | 5 +++++
> > lib/Makefile | 1 +
> > 2 files changed, 6 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/lib/Kconfig b/lib/Kconfig
> > index 965cf7bc03..2f38e37802 100644
> > --- a/lib/Kconfig
> > +++ b/lib/Kconfig
> > @@ -418,6 +418,11 @@ config SPL_LZ4
> > fast compression and decompression speed. It belongs to the LZ77
> > family of byte-oriented compression schemes.
> >
> > +config SPL_LZMA
> > + bool "Enable LZMA decompression support for SPL build"
> > + help
> > + This enables support for LZMA compression altorithm for SPL boot.
>
> %s/altorithm/algorithm/g
>
> Why do we need yet another algorithm for compression?
>
> Doesn't Zstandard provide a much faster decompression?
> Cf. https://sites.google.com/site/powturbo/home/web-compression
>
> Best regards
>
> Heinrich
>
> > +
> > config SPL_LZO
> > bool "Enable LZO decompression support in SPL"
> > help
> > diff --git a/lib/Makefile b/lib/Makefile
> > index 1fb650cd90..8e51eec01c 100644
> > --- a/lib/Makefile
> > +++ b/lib/Makefile
> > @@ -64,6 +64,7 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_$(SPL_)ZLIB) += zlib/
> > obj-$(CONFIG_$(SPL_)ZSTD) += zstd/
> > obj-$(CONFIG_$(SPL_)GZIP) += gunzip.o
> > obj-$(CONFIG_$(SPL_)LZO) += lzo/
> > +obj-$(CONFIG_$(SPL_)LZMA) += lzma/
> > obj-$(CONFIG_$(SPL_)LZ4) += lz4_wrapper.o
> >
> > obj-$(CONFIG_LIBAVB) += libavb/
> >
Hi Heinrich,
I need an algorithm with the maximum compression ratio to reduce the
size of the u-boot payload as much as possible.
I believe currently lzma and xz are the best choices.
Refer to:
https://catchchallenger.first-world.info/wiki/Quick_Benchmark:_Gzip_vs_Bzip2_vs_LZMA_vs_XZ_vs_LZ4_vs_LZO
Although they will take longer time for compression and decompression,
considering that the u-boot payload is usually small (<= 1MiB), there
will not be significant effect on decompression time.
Best Regards,
Weijie
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-01-09 8:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-01-08 3:01 [PATCH 11/16] lib: enable lzma decompression support for SPL build Weijie Gao
2020-01-08 7:22 ` Heinrich Schuchardt
2020-01-09 8:10 ` Weijie Gao [this message]
2020-01-09 17:45 ` Tom Rini
2020-01-10 8:21 ` Weijie Gao
2020-01-10 14:17 ` Tom Rini
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1578557412.5535.7.camel@mcddlt001 \
--to=weijie.gao@mediatek.com \
--cc=u-boot@lists.denx.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox