From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: =?utf-8?Q?Beno=C3=AEt_Th=C3=A9baudeau?= Date: Mon, 18 Mar 2013 13:08:23 +0100 (CET) Subject: [U-Boot] [PATCH v2 1/5] imx iim: Homogenize and fix register definitions In-Reply-To: <5147038E.80706@denx.de> References: <867526288.2224095.1354023015881.JavaMail.root@advansee.com> <5147038E.80706@denx.de> Message-ID: <1585915534.615515.1363608503953.JavaMail.root@advansee.com> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: u-boot@lists.denx.de Hi Stefano, On Monday, March 18, 2013 1:07:42 PM, Stefano Babic wrote: > On 27/11/2012 14:30, Beno?t Th?baudeau wrote: > > Homogenize prg_p naming (the reference manuals are not always > > self-consistent > > for that). Add missing registers. Fix some registers. > > > > Signed-off-by: Beno?t Th?baudeau > > Cc: Stefano Babic > > Cc: Wolfgang Denk > > --- > > Hi Beno?t, > > checking again which patches were left in an unknow state, I face again > with you IIM patchset. My last status was that it shouldbe better to add > some test check (as we have for nand scrub..) to avoid to destroy at the > first attempt the SOC. Anyway, it is a minor point, and can be added > later - I am convinced that who works with U-Boot must know what he is > doing. > > It would be a pity if we miss to merge this patchset - so my plan is to > merge it now into u-boot-imx, asking Anatolji if he agree with 5/5 > (related to MPC-5121 only). Or do you plan to submit a new version ? I had a plan to send a new version: what you mention, but also some documentation and other types of improvements that Otavio and Eric asked for. I also wanted to add support for i.MX6 OTG, but it might take a bit longer, so that could be done separately. I will try to send early this week the new version with the minor improvements. Best regards, Beno?t