From: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de
Subject: [PATCH 0/3] mmc: mmc_spi: Fix potential spec violation in receiving card response
Date: Mon, 1 Feb 2021 12:20:31 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1612153234-7061-1-git-send-email-bmeng.cn@gmail.com> (raw)
After command is sent and before card response shows up on the line,
there is a variable number of clock cycles in between called Ncr.
The spec [1] says the minimum is 1 byte and the maximum is 8 bytes.
Current logic in mmc_spi_sendcmd() has a flaw that it could only work
with certain SD cards with their Ncr being just 1 byte.
When resp_match is false, the codes try to receive only 1 byte from
the SD card. On the other hand when resp_match is true, the logic
happens to be no problem as it loops until timeout to receive as many
bytes as possible to see a match of the expected resp_match_value.
However not every call to mmc_spi_sendcmd() is made with resp_match
being true hence this exposes a potential issue with SD cards that
have a larger Ncr value.
Given no issue was reported as of today, we can reasonably conclude
that all cards being used on the supported boards happen to have a 1
byte Ncr timing requirement. But a broken case can be triggered by
utilizing QEMU to emulate a larger value of Ncr (by default 1 byte
Ncr is used on QEMU). This series fixes such potential spec violation
to improve the card compatibility.
[1] "Physical Layer Specification Version 8.00"
chapter 7.5.1: Command / Response
chapter 7.5.4: Timing Values
Bin Meng (3):
mmc: mmc_spi: Move argument check to the beginning of
mmc_spi_sendcmd()
mmc: mmc_spi: Fix potential spec violation in receiving card response
mmc: mmc_spi: Document the 3 local functions
drivers/mmc/mmc_spi.c | 74 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------------
1 file changed, 55 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-)
--
2.7.4
next reply other threads:[~2021-02-01 4:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-02-01 4:20 Bin Meng [this message]
2021-02-01 4:20 ` [PATCH 1/3] mmc: mmc_spi: Move argument check to the beginning of mmc_spi_sendcmd() Bin Meng
2021-02-01 4:51 ` Jaehoon Chung
2021-02-01 4:20 ` [PATCH 2/3] mmc: mmc_spi: Fix potential spec violation in receiving card response Bin Meng
2021-02-01 4:56 ` Jaehoon Chung
2021-02-01 21:58 ` Jaehoon Chung
2021-02-01 4:20 ` [PATCH 3/3] mmc: mmc_spi: Document the 3 local functions Bin Meng
2021-02-01 4:53 ` Jaehoon Chung
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1612153234-7061-1-git-send-email-bmeng.cn@gmail.com \
--to=bmeng.cn@gmail.com \
--cc=u-boot@lists.denx.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox