public inbox for u-boot@lists.denx.de
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de
Subject: [PATCH 0/3] mmc: mmc_spi: Fix potential spec violation in receiving card response
Date: Mon,  1 Feb 2021 12:20:31 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1612153234-7061-1-git-send-email-bmeng.cn@gmail.com> (raw)


After command is sent and before card response shows up on the line,
there is a variable number of clock cycles in between called Ncr.
The spec [1] says the minimum is 1 byte and the maximum is 8 bytes.

Current logic in mmc_spi_sendcmd() has a flaw that it could only work
with certain SD cards with their Ncr being just 1 byte.

When resp_match is false, the codes try to receive only 1 byte from
the SD card. On the other hand when resp_match is true, the logic
happens to be no problem as it loops until timeout to receive as many
bytes as possible to see a match of the expected resp_match_value.
However not every call to mmc_spi_sendcmd() is made with resp_match
being true hence this exposes a potential issue with SD cards that
have a larger Ncr value.

Given no issue was reported as of today, we can reasonably conclude
that all cards being used on the supported boards happen to have a 1
byte Ncr timing requirement. But a broken case can be triggered by
utilizing QEMU to emulate a larger value of Ncr (by default 1 byte
Ncr is used on QEMU). This series fixes such potential spec violation
to improve the card compatibility.

[1] "Physical Layer Specification Version 8.00"
     chapter 7.5.1: Command / Response
     chapter 7.5.4: Timing Values


Bin Meng (3):
  mmc: mmc_spi: Move argument check to the beginning of
    mmc_spi_sendcmd()
  mmc: mmc_spi: Fix potential spec violation in receiving card response
  mmc: mmc_spi: Document the 3 local functions

 drivers/mmc/mmc_spi.c | 74 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------------
 1 file changed, 55 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-)

-- 
2.7.4

             reply	other threads:[~2021-02-01  4:20 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-02-01  4:20 Bin Meng [this message]
2021-02-01  4:20 ` [PATCH 1/3] mmc: mmc_spi: Move argument check to the beginning of mmc_spi_sendcmd() Bin Meng
2021-02-01  4:51   ` Jaehoon Chung
2021-02-01  4:20 ` [PATCH 2/3] mmc: mmc_spi: Fix potential spec violation in receiving card response Bin Meng
2021-02-01  4:56   ` Jaehoon Chung
2021-02-01 21:58   ` Jaehoon Chung
2021-02-01  4:20 ` [PATCH 3/3] mmc: mmc_spi: Document the 3 local functions Bin Meng
2021-02-01  4:53   ` Jaehoon Chung

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1612153234-7061-1-git-send-email-bmeng.cn@gmail.com \
    --to=bmeng.cn@gmail.com \
    --cc=u-boot@lists.denx.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox