public inbox for u-boot@lists.denx.de
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Marc Dietrich <marvin24@gmx.de>
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de
Subject: [U-Boot] [PATCH] disk: fix unaligned access in efi partitions
Date: Fri, 29 Mar 2013 16:13:47 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1620255.73TLX5Us40@ax5200p> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130329133226.3483be02@lilith>

Albert,

On Friday 29 March 2013 13:32:26 Albert ARIBAUD wrote:
> On Fri, 29 Mar 2013 12:28:58 +0100, Marc Dietrich <marvin24@gmx.de> wrote:
> > start_sect is not aligned to a 4 byte boundary thus causing exceptions
> > on ARM platforms. Access this field via the get_unaligned macro.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Marc Dietrich <marvin24@gmx.de>
> > ---
> > 
> >  disk/part_efi.c |    3 ++-
> >  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/disk/part_efi.c b/disk/part_efi.c
> > index b3fd0e9..6678a4c 100644
> > --- a/disk/part_efi.c
> > +++ b/disk/part_efi.c
> > @@ -30,6 +30,7 @@
> > 
> >   *
> >   * This limits the maximum size of addressable storage to < 2 Terra Bytes
> >   */
> > 
> > +#include <asm/unaligned.h>
> > 
> >  #include <common.h>
> >  #include <command.h>
> >  #include <ide.h>
> > 
> > @@ -505,7 +506,7 @@ err:
> >  static int pmbr_part_valid(struct partition *part)
> >  {
> >  
> >  	if (part->sys_ind == EFI_PMBR_OSTYPE_EFI_GPT &&
> > 
> > -		le32_to_cpu(part->start_sect) == 1UL) {
> > +		le32_to_cpu(get_unaligned(&part->start_sect)) == 1UL) {
> > 
> >  		return 1;
> >  	
> >  	}
> 
> Suits me :) but did you not say the same issue was also affecting
> nr_sects?

I checked again and this field is never read - only written to but to an 
aligned buffer. So there shouldn't be a problem.

> Also, beside the asm/unaligned.h file I gave as an example, other header
> files in include/linux/unaligned/ exist that provide alignment-related
> macros, notably with _le and _be versions. Maybe you can find one that
> combines the effects of both le32_to_cpu() and get_unaligned()?

I looks like get_unaligned does the job for us already, so we can leave the 
le32_to_cpu out. But I cannot test it here because of missing big endian 
machine with efi and my two brain halfs are already swapped until confusion 
(start_sect is defined as _le32). 

Albert, I like to get a fix for this into 2013.04 if possible. Maybe someone 
with more endian experience can look at it quickly.

Marc

  reply	other threads:[~2013-03-29 15:13 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-03-29 11:28 [U-Boot] [PATCH] disk: fix unaligned access in efi partitions Marc Dietrich
2013-03-29 12:32 ` Albert ARIBAUD
2013-03-29 15:13   ` Marc Dietrich [this message]
2013-03-29 15:57     ` Stephen Warren

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1620255.73TLX5Us40@ax5200p \
    --to=marvin24@gmx.de \
    --cc=u-boot@lists.denx.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox