From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from phobos.denx.de (phobos.denx.de [85.214.62.61]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CBD51C433EF for ; Tue, 19 Jul 2022 17:02:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: from h2850616.stratoserver.net (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by phobos.denx.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 26AE3839F6; Tue, 19 Jul 2022 19:02:43 +0200 (CEST) Authentication-Results: phobos.denx.de; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.microsoft.com Authentication-Results: phobos.denx.de; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=u-boot-bounces@lists.denx.de Authentication-Results: phobos.denx.de; dkim=pass (1024-bit key; unprotected) header.d=linux.microsoft.com header.i=@linux.microsoft.com header.b="sU2HdHuK"; dkim-atps=neutral Received: by phobos.denx.de (Postfix, from userid 109) id 7B1E780F88; Tue, 19 Jul 2022 19:02:42 +0200 (CEST) Received: from linux.microsoft.com (linux.microsoft.com [13.77.154.182]) by phobos.denx.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id CF51980F88 for ; Tue, 19 Jul 2022 19:02:39 +0200 (CEST) Authentication-Results: phobos.denx.de; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.microsoft.com Authentication-Results: phobos.denx.de; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=dphadke@linux.microsoft.com Received: by linux.microsoft.com (Postfix, from userid 1046) id 8D8A220FD8E0; Tue, 19 Jul 2022 10:02:38 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 linux.microsoft.com 8D8A220FD8E0 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linux.microsoft.com; s=default; t=1658250158; bh=Kmx9OmTJ9c4R3riIn9AtbFas1rmJ/HWEHA8QUquG/NM=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=sU2HdHuKKOLyd3VyNhsFVUYRewM8VrvTAxFUsBk2/KiyzspJCsEUB1VeBgaO2MLTQ j71jWLM0EYuRdX8U4WXFXt/ohdHSPLoC2F1IqFPeZf08N/yC2JEVO/1KZA2tbJt+7M FIJ57kgCP+EHkORvedBvhPsHvRD/q+/3XnnH5w9U= From: Dhananjay Phadke To: judge.packham@gmail.com Cc: dphadke@linux.microsoft.com, seanedmond@microsoft.com, u-boot@lists.denx.de Subject: Re: u-boot and IPv6 Date: Tue, 19 Jul 2022 10:02:22 -0700 Message-Id: <1658250142-23852-1-git-send-email-dphadke@linux.microsoft.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 1.8.3.1 In-Reply-To: References: X-BeenThere: u-boot@lists.denx.de X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39 Precedence: list List-Id: U-Boot discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: u-boot-bounces@lists.denx.de Sender: "U-Boot" X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.103.6 at phobos.denx.de X-Virus-Status: Clean On Wed, 13 Jul 2022, Chris Packham wrote: > On Tue, Jul 12, 2022 at 7:40 PM Chris Packham wrote: >> >> Hi Sean and Dhananjay, >> >> Adding U-Boot ML to the Cc >> [...] >> >> IPv6 support is definitely something I want to get landed in upstream U-Boot. >> >> It seemed to be fairly well received last time I posted the series. The main thing lacking was tests. That's pretty much where things were at last time I touched it. As usual life and work commitments have stopped me from progressing it further. >> >> In the meantime U-Boot's testing infrastructure has improved a lot which should make adding the tests easier. I know there have been some more changes in net that will conflict but not badly. >> >> At $dayjob we have merged a newer u-boot version into our fork so I do have something that is effectively a post state for the merge conflict to refer to but it's not the broken out series that I'd like to submit. >> >> I think I should be able to get the series rebased against master (or the just released 2022.07 might be more useful as a base). I can probably get that up on github in the next couple of days. > > I've rebased my series against v2022.07 you can get the code from the > ipv6 branch of https://github.com/cpackham/u-boot.git > > I've only lightly compile tested it so I've no idea if it's still functional Hi Chris, Thank you for refreshing the topic and rebasing. Are you planning to post a v4? Besides tests, you had identified some gaps in previous series (DHCP, SLAAC, etc). We are looking for having IPv6 in upstream, happy to fill in what will help it. Regards, Dhananjay