public inbox for u-boot@lists.denx.de
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Benoît Thébaudeau" <benoit.thebaudeau@advansee.com>
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de
Subject: [U-Boot] [PATCH 3/5] Add fuse API and commands
Date: Mon, 26 Nov 2012 17:03:15 +0100 (CET)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <178628824.2148673.1353945795295.JavaMail.root@advansee.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <50362EC8.8080905@boundarydevices.com>

Hi Eric, all,

On Thursday, August 23, 2012 3:23:20 PM, Eric Nelson wrote:
> On 08/23/2012 03:31 AM, Stefano Babic wrote:
> > On 22/08/2012 12:43, Dirk Behme wrote:
> >> On 14.08.2012 14:52, Beno?t Th?baudeau wrote:
> >>> This can be useful for fuse-like hardware, OTP SoC options, etc.
> >>
> >> For i.MX6, I have a port of the OTP support from Freescale's
> >> U-Boot to
> >> our mainline U-Boot in the queue [1].
> >>
> >> As I don't have the overview over the various i.MXxx SoCs and
> >> don't
> >> understand much of this patch below: Should this implement the
> >> same
> >> functionality like my patch [1] for i.MX6?
> >
> > I have not checked the details. but seeing the code it looks that
> > the
> > procedure to read / write are different. In this case, a further
> > driver
> > is ok.
> >
> > Anyway, you should take a look if your patches can be used on a mxs
> > (MX28) device, because they should be closer. And then I will not
> > like
> > to have a driver for each SOC.
> >
> > Generally, I think we should use the approach of the common command
> > and
> > a specific fuse implementation. Then this API should be used by
> > your
> > patches as well.
> >
> I agree.
> 
> The use of the fuse API will likely result in more code than the
> imxotp implementation, and more importantly, it will make the usage
> more confusing by introducing terms bank and row.
> 
> Reading and writing fuses is probably not an area that we want
> confusion.

I am looking again into this question now that I have the i.MX6 reference
manual.

I don't see any difference between IIM and OCOTP features:
 - There are still banks: They exist as seen from the controller, even if they
   don't exist physically in the efusebox. See 46.2.1 and OCOTP memory map
   ("Value of OTP Bankx Wordy" shadow registers).
 - Rows are named words.
 - The read operations are read accesses to the shadow registers.
 - The sense operations are direct fuse reads (shadow reload + read), as
   explained by the steps in 46.2.1.2.
 - The prog operations are the programming of the fuses, as explained by the
   steps in 46.2.1.3.
 - The override operations are simple write accesses to the shadow registers, as
   explained in 46.2.1.3.

As to the vocabulary used, the differences are:
 - "row" -> "word".
 - "sense" -> "direct read".

Hence, the fuse API applies very well in this case too.

Best regards,
Beno?t

  reply	other threads:[~2012-11-26 16:03 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 38+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-08-14 12:51 [U-Boot] [PATCH 0/5] Make iim support common to mpc and imx Benoît Thébaudeau
2012-08-14 12:52 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH 1/5] imx iim: Homogenize and fix register definitions Benoît Thébaudeau
2012-11-27 13:30   ` [U-Boot] [PATCH v2 " Benoît Thébaudeau
2012-11-27 13:30     ` [U-Boot] [PATCH v2 2/5] imx iim: Add useful fuse definitions Benoît Thébaudeau
2012-11-27 13:31     ` [U-Boot] [PATCH v2 3/5] Add fuse API and commands Benoît Thébaudeau
2012-11-27 13:31     ` [U-Boot] [PATCH v2 4/5] Add fsl_iim driver Benoît Thébaudeau
2012-11-27 13:32     ` [U-Boot] [PATCH v2 5/5] mpc iim: Switch to common fsl_iim Benoît Thébaudeau
2013-03-18 12:07     ` [U-Boot] [PATCH v2 1/5] imx iim: Homogenize and fix register definitions Stefano Babic
2013-03-18 12:08       ` Benoît Thébaudeau
2013-03-18 12:13         ` Benoît Thébaudeau
2012-08-14 12:52 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH 2/5] imx iim: Add useful fuse definitions Benoît Thébaudeau
2012-08-14 12:52 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH 3/5] Add fuse API and commands Benoît Thébaudeau
2012-08-21  8:11   ` Stefano Babic
2012-08-21 10:14     ` Benoît Thébaudeau
2012-08-22 10:43   ` Dirk Behme
2012-08-22 11:11     ` Benoît Thébaudeau
2012-08-22 16:25       ` Dirk Behme
2012-08-22 16:53         ` Benoît Thébaudeau
2012-08-23 10:31     ` Stefano Babic
2012-08-23 13:23       ` Eric Nelson
2012-11-26 16:03         ` Benoît Thébaudeau [this message]
2012-11-27  7:19           ` Dirk Behme
2012-11-27 16:58             ` Eric Nelson
2012-11-27 18:27               ` Benoît Thébaudeau
2012-11-27 18:36                 ` Eric Nelson
2012-11-27 19:23                   ` Benoît Thébaudeau
2012-11-27 19:54                     ` Eric Nelson
2012-12-03  9:03   ` Stefano Babic
2012-12-03 11:25     ` Benoît Thébaudeau
2012-12-03 11:41       ` Stefano Babic
2012-08-14 12:52 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH 4/5] Add fsl_iim driver Benoît Thébaudeau
2012-08-21  8:13   ` Stefano Babic
2012-08-21 12:56     ` Benoît Thébaudeau
2012-08-21 13:41       ` Stefano Babic
2012-08-14 12:53 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH 5/5] mpc iim: Switch to common fsl_iim Benoît Thébaudeau
2012-08-15 14:30   ` Benoît Thébaudeau
2012-08-21  8:15   ` Stefano Babic
2012-11-05 20:05     ` Benoît Thébaudeau

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=178628824.2148673.1353945795295.JavaMail.root@advansee.com \
    --to=benoit.thebaudeau@advansee.com \
    --cc=u-boot@lists.denx.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox