From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from phobos.denx.de (phobos.denx.de [85.214.62.61]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C3BE0C87FCF for ; Thu, 7 Aug 2025 23:15:56 +0000 (UTC) Received: from h2850616.stratoserver.net (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by phobos.denx.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1364784673; Fri, 8 Aug 2025 01:15:54 +0200 (CEST) Authentication-Results: phobos.denx.de; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=ti.com Authentication-Results: phobos.denx.de; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=u-boot-bounces@lists.denx.de Authentication-Results: phobos.denx.de; dkim=pass (1024-bit key; unprotected) header.d=ti.com header.i=@ti.com header.b="pgDYaW0R"; dkim-atps=neutral Received: by phobos.denx.de (Postfix, from userid 109) id B31CF84673; Fri, 8 Aug 2025 01:15:52 +0200 (CEST) Received: from fllvem-ot04.ext.ti.com (fllvem-ot04.ext.ti.com [198.47.19.246]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by phobos.denx.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id ACD5C845EC for ; Fri, 8 Aug 2025 01:14:41 +0200 (CEST) Authentication-Results: phobos.denx.de; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=ti.com Authentication-Results: phobos.denx.de; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=jm@ti.com Received: from fllvem-sh03.itg.ti.com ([10.64.41.86]) by fllvem-ot04.ext.ti.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 577NEcj1848536; Thu, 7 Aug 2025 18:14:38 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ti.com; s=ti-com-17Q1; t=1754608478; bh=jUVy+Ahepw0eeikRESXusTD6i2JZByBcvGbdZHk3vTA=; h=Date:Subject:To:CC:References:From:In-Reply-To; b=pgDYaW0R22BS5k9v6gHf6/IVVNbhA8ZHnCnGtfBmLvfpDBqFPs4/ZTuDGymNCqmlh AUpNMnV2ZT5yxiNKuxcWHNphcxhniI3qpaR22D+oTo/ZNZmp8AqfnnXR8TQwX/Lr8V J99svalOOte97jLn9zu3TdstFfwWNvdbFXd44bRg= Received: from DFLE109.ent.ti.com (dfle109.ent.ti.com [10.64.6.30]) by fllvem-sh03.itg.ti.com (8.18.1/8.18.1) with ESMTPS id 577NEckL487670 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-SHA256 bits=128 verify=FAIL); Thu, 7 Aug 2025 18:14:38 -0500 Received: from DFLE104.ent.ti.com (10.64.6.25) by DFLE109.ent.ti.com (10.64.6.30) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA256_P256) id 15.1.2507.55; Thu, 7 Aug 2025 18:14:38 -0500 Received: from lelvem-mr05.itg.ti.com (10.180.75.9) by DFLE104.ent.ti.com (10.64.6.25) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA256_P256) id 15.1.2507.55 via Frontend Transport; Thu, 7 Aug 2025 18:14:38 -0500 Received: from [128.247.81.105] (judy-hp.dhcp.ti.com [128.247.81.105]) by lelvem-mr05.itg.ti.com (8.18.1/8.18.1) with ESMTP id 577NEcmC2110357; Thu, 7 Aug 2025 18:14:38 -0500 Message-ID: <18f1e05c-2be9-4a6f-af50-904d4a2ed1c2@ti.com> Date: Thu, 7 Aug 2025 18:14:38 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/2] Add support for AM62P SR1.2 To: Peng Fan , Jaehoon Chung , Tom Rini CC: Bryan Brattlof , Vignesh Raghavendra , References: <20250805161419.1781935-1-jm@ti.com> Content-Language: en-US From: Judith Mendez In-Reply-To: <20250805161419.1781935-1-jm@ti.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-C2ProcessedOrg: 333ef613-75bf-4e12-a4b1-8e3623f5dcea X-BeenThere: u-boot@lists.denx.de X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39 Precedence: list List-Id: U-Boot discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: u-boot-bounces@lists.denx.de Sender: "U-Boot" X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.103.8 at phobos.denx.de X-Virus-Status: Clean Hi Peng, Tom, On 8/5/25 11:14 AM, Judith Mendez wrote: > This patch series adds support for the AM62P SR1.2 silicon revision by > adding support in soc_ti_k3 to detect AM62P variants. > > Also disable HS400 support for AM62P SR1.0 and SR1.1 in sdhci host driver. > For AM62P SR1.2, eMMC HS400 should be enabled by default. I will have to change these patches due to mirror version of these patches changed in Linux drastically, mainly, DT patch was dropped which affects u-boot implementation. Sorry for jumping the gun with u-boot. I will respin u-boot patches once linux side is stable [0]. [0] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mmc/20250805234950.3781367-1-jm@ti.com ~ Judith