From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Wolfgang Denk <wd@denx.de>
Date: Mon, 31 Mar 2003 14:34:43 +0200
Subject: [U-Boot-Users] [PATCH] 1/5: cmd_boot 
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Mon, 31 Mar 2003 13:13:31 BST."
             <A1DD009E87CDD2119E940008C7334DA402339AFF@exchange01> 
Message-ID: <20030331123448.7ECF1C587C@atlas.denx.de>
List-Id: <u-boot.lists.denx.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de

In message <A1DD009E87CDD2119E940008C7334DA402339AFF@exchange01> you wrote:
> Is there any reason we can't have an '#ifdef MINICOM'?

Ar you just asking, or do you really experience any  minicom  related
problems your own? [Why do you use it, then?]


Best regards,

Wolfgang Denk

-- 
Software Engineering:  Embedded and Realtime Systems,  Embedded Linux
Phone: (+49)-8142-4596-87  Fax: (+49)-8142-4596-88  Email: wd at denx.de
It is impractical for  the  standard  to  attempt  to  constrain  the
behavior  of code that does not obey the constraints of the standard.
                                                          - Doug Gwyn