[U-Boot-Users] [PATCH] 1/5: cmd_boot

Robert Schwebel
2003-03-31T14:16:07Z

On Mon, Mar 31, 2003 at 04:03:45PM +0200, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
> Ummm... YMMV, but IMHO a working tool is _always_ better than a
> broken one, no matter which user interface it has.

Above you stated that you don't know if minicom is broken or if it has
another reason.

> > People use it, so it should be supported. Other question: does my patch
> > do any harm to your ckermit? If not, what's the problem?
>
> Code size. Yes, even these few bytes.

Wolfgang, the code has been in that file for ages. The only thing I did
is to move it to the right location, which is _before_ the printf() in
load_serial_bin(), not _after_ the function returned. Please explain why
moving code changes the binary size.

Robert
--
Dipl.-Ing. Robert Schwebel | http://www.pengutronix.de
Pengutronix - Linux Solutions for Science and Industry
Braunschweiger Str. 79, 31134 Hildesheim, Germany
Handelsregister: Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686
Phone: +49-5121-28619-0 | Fax: +49-5121-28619-4