public inbox for u-boot@lists.denx.de
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Wolfgang Denk <wd@denx.de>
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de
Subject: [U-Boot-Users] [PATCH] Pass full u-boot environment to booting kernel
Date: Tue, 14 Sep 2004 15:19:53 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20040914131958.88FCDC1430@atlas.denx.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Tue, 14 Sep 2004 15:01:40 +0300." <4146DDA4.5070009@intracom.gr>

In message <4146DDA4.5070009@intracom.gr> you wrote:
>
> It's a discussion related to the kernel. Its mainly private email
> exchanges.

I really like this new trend in Free Software development :-(

The interesting public mailing lists (linuxppc) get  shut  down,  and
discussions  about  future  kernel  developments take place on IRC or
"private email exchanges" only.

If you don't happen do be chosen for such elitist circles you  cannot
participate in kernel development any more.

This is not my idea of how things should be done.


> The consensus is that there is no consensus for anything but the
> fact that something like this is needed.
> 
> The other solution discussed is bi_recs.

I will not comment on things I have no chance to get an opinion about.

> If you take a look at the patch you'll see that the environment is not
> passed in the command line.
> 
> Merely a memory structure in a non-overwrittable area is created and
> the (physical) address of it is passed to the kernel.

There is no kernel interface for such stuff in existing Linux kernels
(at least as far as they are accessable by mere  mortals).  There  is
not even a definition of "non-overwrittable area".


As long as there is no agreement how the  Linux  kernel  will  handle
these  issues  (and  with  "Linux  kernel"  I  mean  what  you get at
kernel.org, and what works at least on ARM, MIPS and  PowerPC)  I  do
not want to add this to U-Boot.

Best regards,

Wolfgang Denk

-- 
Software Engineering:  Embedded and Realtime Systems,  Embedded Linux
Phone: (+49)-8142-4596-87  Fax: (+49)-8142-4596-88  Email: wd at denx.de
Systems programmers are the high priests of a low cult.
                                                       -- R.S. Barton

  reply	other threads:[~2004-09-14 13:19 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2004-09-14 10:25 [U-Boot-Users] [PATCH] Pass full u-boot environment to booting kernel Pantelis Antoniou
2004-09-14 11:47 ` Wolfgang Denk
2004-09-14 12:01   ` Pantelis Antoniou
2004-09-14 13:19     ` Wolfgang Denk [this message]
2004-09-14 13:26       ` Pantelis Antoniou
2004-09-14 15:28         ` Wolfgang Denk
2004-09-14 17:46       ` Eugene Surovegin
2004-09-14 20:37         ` Dan Malek
2004-09-15 13:05       ` Marius Groeger
2004-09-15 13:24         ` Wolfgang Denk
2004-09-15 13:40           ` Pantelis Antoniou
2004-09-15 14:54             ` Wolfgang Denk
2004-09-15 14:04           ` Marius Groeger
2004-09-15 15:00             ` Wolfgang Denk
2004-09-15 14:59           ` Robert Schwebel

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20040914131958.88FCDC1430@atlas.denx.de \
    --to=wd@denx.de \
    --cc=u-boot@lists.denx.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox