From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Wolfgang Denk <wd@denx.de>
Date: Mon, 13 Dec 2004 11:05:36 +0100
Subject: [U-Boot-Users] PATCH cpu/at91rm9200/start.S 
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Mon, 13 Dec 2004 10:52:45 +0100."
             <41BD666D.7060207@imc-berlin.de> 
Message-ID: <20041213100541.887DEC1430@atlas.denx.de>
List-Id: <u-boot.lists.denx.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de

In message <41BD666D.7060207@imc-berlin.de> you wrote:
>
> I did not start the duplication! memsetup.S for at91rm9200dk and cmc_pu2 look 
> pretty much the same already! The clock setup for both boards is done in memsetup.S.

I know :-(

> I aggree that duplicating code is bad and a generic cpu/at91rm9200/clocks.S 
> would be better. But why did you accept the other patch
> 
> * Update for AT91RM9200DK and CMC_PU2 boards:
>    - Enable booting directly from flash
> 
> in the first place???

Because it was needed to get a project running for a paying customer,
and I didn't have enough time to clean it upo myself :-(

Best regards,

Wolfgang Denk

-- 
Software Engineering:  Embedded and Realtime Systems,  Embedded Linux
Phone: (+49)-8142-66989-10 Fax: (+49)-8142-66989-80 Email: wd at denx.de
You don't have to worry about me. I might have been born yesterday...
but I stayed up all night.