From: Wolfgang Denk <wd@denx.de>
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de
Subject: [U-Boot-Users] Advice about a problem compiling with alternative toolchain
Date: Tue, 14 Dec 2004 17:43:14 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20041214164319.55298C1430@atlas.denx.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Tue, 14 Dec 2004 11:22:28 EST." <41BF1344.7020103@wiline.com>
In message <41BF1344.7020103@wiline.com> you wrote:
>
> So, I now wanted to try and compile the bootloader using a version
> of gcc greater or equal to 3.3. Maybe this is a bad idea but I was
It is not a bad idea - it should work fine. ELDK release 3.1 uses
GC-3.3.3, and this works fine.
> curious. Anyway the compilation seemed to go fine but producing the
> srec, "objcopy --gap-fill=0xff -O srec u-boot u-boot.srec", resulted in
> the objcopy application being stuck in a long loop and eating up a
> significant amount of system memory. Apparently it had caculated that
I've seen this before. It happened for the ERIC board. The problem
was that the TEXT_BASE definition for the ERIC board was set to
0xFFFE0000 while the resultant code and data size of U-Boot was
bigger than the 0x20000 bytes. This confused the linker and objcopy
because the memory address of the last portion of the image goes
beyond the 0xFFFFFFFF value causing an overflow of a 32-bit variable.
The easiest way to solve the problem for this particular board was to
change the TEXT_BASE definition to a lower value, for instance to
0xFFFC0000.
> output of the compiler is different than what should be expected. I know
> an easy solution would be to use the ELDK in place of the current
> toolchain but I'm more interested in understanding what is going wrong.
Check if it's really a toolchain problem, or just a misconfiguration
for your board.
For example, try if you can build other (standard) board
configurations using your toolchain.
Best regards,
Wolfgang Denk
--
Software Engineering: Embedded and Realtime Systems, Embedded Linux
Phone: (+49)-8142-66989-10 Fax: (+49)-8142-66989-80 Email: wd at denx.de
The people of Gideon have always believed that life is sacred. That
the love of life is the greatest gift ... We are incapable of
destroying or interfering with the creation of that which we love so
deeply -- life in every form from fetus to developed being.
-- Hodin of Gideon, "The Mark of Gideon", stardate 5423.4
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-12-14 16:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-12-14 16:22 [U-Boot-Users] Advice about a problem compiling with alternative toolchain Andrew Reusch
2004-12-14 16:43 ` Wolfgang Denk [this message]
2004-12-14 19:04 ` Andrew Reusch
2004-12-14 19:24 ` Wolfgang Denk
2004-12-14 19:44 ` Andrew Reusch
2004-12-15 15:47 ` Andrew Reusch
2004-12-15 18:29 ` Andrew Reusch
2004-12-15 18:39 ` Wolfgang Denk
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20041214164319.55298C1430@atlas.denx.de \
--to=wd@denx.de \
--cc=u-boot@lists.denx.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox