From: Wolfgang Denk <wd@denx.de>
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de
Subject: [U-Boot-Users] Using u-boot as application-firmware upgrader / Performing logical operations?
Date: Wed, 22 Dec 2004 11:57:31 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20041222105736.437C0C1430@atlas.denx.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Wed, 22 Dec 2004 10:23:11 +0100." <cqbedv$el6$1@sea.gmane.org>
Dear Martin,
in message <cqbedv$el6$1@sea.gmane.org> you wrote:
>
> I have plans of using u-boot as the last-and-ever-working
> application-firmware-upgrade (in case my Linux [from NAND] is somehow
> damged).
You're not the first to implement this. See the existing code.
> Hence my plans are that U-boot should perform the following on startup:
>
> 1) Try fetching new application-image using tftp against some hardcoded
> address
Why a hardcoded address instead of the usual, configurable mechanism?
> 2) Timeout after 2 secs if no connection (skip to pt 5) (logigs needed)
A timeout is probably not what you want. And how do you define "no
connection"? There is many steps for a TFTP download which can
produce errors, and you will need to handle them - a simple timeout
may as well kill running download, or otherwise stuck downloads may
hang your system.
> 3) Perform some simple validation of the image - e.g. check that the
> last bytes of the image is "egholm" (logics needed)
Why not use the built-in verification (through CRC checksum.
timestamp, image name etc.) ? See for example board/trab/auto_update.c
> I reckon there is a problem with 2) where the remainder of the script
> should only run in case the tftp-action went well. And the same goes for 3).
>
> Does this idea have a future?
The ide is OK. It has been implemented before. But I disagree with
your approach, at least as far as the timeout and image verification
are concerned.
Best regards,
Wolfgang Denk
--
Software Engineering: Embedded and Realtime Systems, Embedded Linux
Phone: (+49)-8142-66989-10 Fax: (+49)-8142-66989-80 Email: wd at denx.de
You can observe a lot just by watching. - Yogi Berra
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-12-22 10:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-12-22 9:23 [U-Boot-Users] Using u-boot as application-firmware upgrader / Performing logical operations? Martin Egholm Nielsen
2004-12-22 10:57 ` Wolfgang Denk [this message]
2004-12-22 12:29 ` [U-Boot-Users] " Martin Egholm Nielsen
2004-12-22 14:17 ` Wolfgang Denk
2004-12-22 15:57 ` Martin Egholm Nielsen
2004-12-22 16:23 ` Wolfgang Denk
2004-12-23 9:14 ` Martin Egholm Nielsen
2004-12-22 14:44 ` Wolfgang Denk
2004-12-22 15:17 ` Martin Egholm Nielsen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20041222105736.437C0C1430@atlas.denx.de \
--to=wd@denx.de \
--cc=u-boot@lists.denx.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox