[U-Boot-Users] driver_lan91c96 or driver_smc91111

[U-Boot-Users] driver_lan91c96 or driver_smc91111

[Komal Shah]

Hi All,

We are having LAN91C111 chip on our board. And in
linux world we have unified smc91x.c driver.

But in u-boot I got the two options:

So should I go for CONFIG_DRIVER_LAN91C96 or
CONFIG_DRIVER_SMC91111 in u-boot config??? 

As per grep output and reading the source code I think
CONFIG_DRIVER_SMC91111 is the correct one.


=====
---Komal Shah


		
__________________________________ 
Do you Yahoo!? 
Take Yahoo! Mail with you! Get it on your mobile phone. 
http://mobile.yahoo.com/maildemo 

[U-Boot-Users] Re: driver_lan91c96 or driver_smc91111

[Ladislav Michl]

On Wed, Jan 26, 2005 at 06:58:52AM -0800, Komal Shah wrote:
> Hi All,
> 
> We are having LAN91C111 chip on our board. And in
> linux world we have unified smc91x.c driver.
> 
> But in u-boot I got the two options:
> 
> So should I go for CONFIG_DRIVER_LAN91C96 or
> CONFIG_DRIVER_SMC91111 in u-boot config??? 
> 
> As per grep output and reading the source code I think
> CONFIG_DRIVER_SMC91111 is the correct one.

Indeed, that's correct driver.

Regards,
	ladis

[U-Boot-Users] driver_lan91c96 or driver_smc91111

[Christian Pell]

On Wed, 2005-01-26 at 06:58 -0800, Komal Shah wrote:
> Hi All,
> 
> We are having LAN91C111 chip on our board. And in
> linux world we have unified smc91x.c driver.
> 
> But in u-boot I got the two options:
> 
> So should I go for CONFIG_DRIVER_LAN91C96 or
> CONFIG_DRIVER_SMC91111 in u-boot config??? 
> 
> As per grep output and reading the source code I think
> CONFIG_DRIVER_SMC91111 is the correct one.
> 
> 

Hi, beware the 2 controllers are different. If you don't read the
register map carefully you miss important points like that the chunk for
allocating buffer is 256 in the former chip and 1024 in the later.
Anyway if there are 2 different drivers there is obviously a reason so
go for the SMC91111. :-)

Bye, 

[U-Boot-Users] driver_lan91c96 or driver_smc91111

[Komal Shah]

--- Christian Pell <chri@infis.univ.trieste.it> wrote:
> On Wed, 2005-01-26 at 06:58 -0800, Komal Shah wrote:
> > Hi All,
> > 
> > We are having LAN91C111 chip on our board. And in
> > linux world we have unified smc91x.c driver.
> > 
> > But in u-boot I got the two options:
> > 
> > So should I go for CONFIG_DRIVER_LAN91C96 or
> > CONFIG_DRIVER_SMC91111 in u-boot config??? 
> > 
> > As per grep output and reading the source code I
> think
> > CONFIG_DRIVER_SMC91111 is the correct one.
> > 
> > 
> 
> Hi, beware the 2 controllers are different. If you
> don't read the
> register map carefully you miss important points
> like that the chunk for
> allocating buffer is 256 in the former chip and 1024
> in the later.
> Anyway if there are 2 different drivers there is
> obviously a reason so
> go for the SMC91111. :-)

Thanx for the reply. Yes. I selected SMC91111 driver,
no 32 bit access, and internal PHY. 



=====
---Komal Shah


		
__________________________________ 
Do you Yahoo!? 
All your favorites on one personal page ? Try My Yahoo!
http://my.yahoo.com