[U-Boot-Users] driver_lan91c96 or driver_smc91111

Komal Shah
2005-01-27T06:32:08Z

--- Christian Pell <chri@infis.univ.trieste.it> wrote:
> On Wed, 2005-01-26 at 06:58 -0800, Komal Shah wrote:
> > Hi All,
> >
> > We are having LAN91C111 chip on our board. And in
> > linux world we have unified smc91x.c driver.
> >
> > But in u-boot I got the two options:
> >
> > So should I go for CONFIG_DRIVER_LAN91C96 or
> > CONFIG_DRIVER_SMC91111 in u-boot config???
> >
> > As per grep output and reading the source code I
> think
> > CONFIG_DRIVER_SMC91111 is the correct one.
> >
> >
>
> Hi, beware the 2 controllers are different. If you
> don't read the
> register map carefully you miss important points
> like that the chunk for
> allocating buffer is 256 in the former chip and 1024
> in the later.
> Anyway if there are 2 different drivers there is
> obviously a reason so
> go for the SMC91111. :-)

Thanx for the reply. Yes. I selected SMC91111 driver,
no 32 bit access, and internal PHY.

=====
---Komal Shah

__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
All your favorites on one personal page ? Try My Yahoo!