From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Komal Shah <komal_shah802003@yahoo.com>
Date: Wed, 26 Jan 2005 22:32:08 -0800 (PST)
Subject: [U-Boot-Users] driver_lan91c96 or driver_smc91111
In-Reply-To: <1106756028.5589.52.camel@absolute.ascensit.com>
Message-ID: <20050127063208.64624.qmail@web53602.mail.yahoo.com>
List-Id: <u-boot.lists.denx.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de

--- Christian Pell <chri@infis.univ.trieste.it> wrote:
> On Wed, 2005-01-26 at 06:58 -0800, Komal Shah wrote:
> > Hi All,
> > 
> > We are having LAN91C111 chip on our board. And in
> > linux world we have unified smc91x.c driver.
> > 
> > But in u-boot I got the two options:
> > 
> > So should I go for CONFIG_DRIVER_LAN91C96 or
> > CONFIG_DRIVER_SMC91111 in u-boot config??? 
> > 
> > As per grep output and reading the source code I
> think
> > CONFIG_DRIVER_SMC91111 is the correct one.
> > 
> > 
> 
> Hi, beware the 2 controllers are different. If you
> don't read the
> register map carefully you miss important points
> like that the chunk for
> allocating buffer is 256 in the former chip and 1024
> in the later.
> Anyway if there are 2 different drivers there is
> obviously a reason so
> go for the SMC91111. :-)

Thanx for the reply. Yes. I selected SMC91111 driver,
no 32 bit access, and internal PHY. 



=====
---Komal Shah


		
__________________________________ 
Do you Yahoo!? 
All your favorites on one personal page ? Try My Yahoo!
http://my.yahoo.com