From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Stefan Roese Date: Tue, 29 Mar 2005 07:26:00 +0100 Subject: [U-Boot-Users] OCOTEA get_timer() bug In-Reply-To: <20050328195851.A1730C108D@atlas.denx.de> References: <20050328195851.A1730C108D@atlas.denx.de> Message-ID: <200503290826.01044.sr@denx.de> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: u-boot@lists.denx.de On Monday 28 March 2005 21:58, Wolfgang Denk wrote: > > I've tested the following and propose it as a fix, replace this: > > val = gd->bd->bi_intfreq/100; /* 10 msec */ > > with: > > val = gd->bd->bi_intfreq/1000; /* 1 msec */ > > > > I've also tested some of the network related functions to insure that no > > timeout conditions have appeared. > > > > I want to post this patch but would prefer a code review from those that > > are more familiar with get_timer() use within the OCOTEA codebase. > > I don't know why the 440 is handled separately. > > Stefan, do you have an idea? No. The 440 port was done by Scott McNutt , if I remember right. But it seems that the fix is correct. Scott (or any other 440 users), any comments on this? Best regards, Stefan